Absurd and stupid interview questions never to use
Tom Sorensen, Headhunter
?? Executive Search & Recruitment | We help high-ticket clients headhunt candidates for management positions in Thailand and Asia
If you were a doughnut, what kind would you be? Are you a nerd? Can you count to 50?
I couldn’t stop laughing when I recently read the list of naive and brainless interview questions that are used by insane HR departments around the world.
The list was compiled by Anne Fisher, a contributor to Fortune magazine.
But it gets worse. Be annoyed or have a laugh.
Needless to say and unfortunately these and similar questions are truly very poor predictors of job success (as famously noted by Google’s former SVP of People Operations Laszlo Bock).
From Glassdoor’s Top 10 oddball question list
Way too many people-turned-recruiters make it easy for candidates to guess what is the right answer.
I mean, is it not obvious what you must answer to these following three questions, if you want to stand any chance of being considered for the job:
Industrial psychologists studying traditional interviews have concluded that traditional binary interview questions were not effective as they were often hypothetical or theoretical.
Answers did not represent what a candidate had actually done in real-life situations and what the candidate would most likely do again on the job.
Don’t waste the little time you spend with your candidates and don’t play games. Focus on getting facts and achievements from the candidates.
And of course, you can ask the candidates about real-case business or technical issues to solve. These problem-solving questions are fair and not at all curveball questions.
Most used questions by professional recruiters
Now, ladies and gentlemen: introducing behaviour-based interview questions.
领英推荐
Probably the most used question technique in job interviews, used by real professional recruiters, is known by the names behaviour-based interview or competency-based interview or even sometimes called performance-based interview.
The technique is based on a simple premise: A look at the past provides a glimpse of the future.
If you did it before, you'll do it again.
We say that past behaviour and performance are the best predictors of future behaviour and performance.
The basic idea calls for the interviewer to prompt or press the candidate to recall and describe in sometimes excruciating detail real-life incidents that provide evidence of a skill or experience relevant to the new job.
Here are some typical behaviour-based interview questions to use when you develop the questions to ask at the interview.
The answers will reveal his or her true self by providing details of relevant real-life experiences:
Techniques to make your next interview the best ever
Finishing off this week’s blog, here are some great tips to make your next interview successful.
Use prepared questions: This will help you provide a structure, allow you to treat all fairly and to compare candidates with one another.
Get the full story. If you can’t get an answer at all, or it is vague, use different choice of words. Or come back to the question later in the interview.
Handling silence: Wait five to second seconds after asking your question, and let the candidate have a little time to think about the answer.
Control the interview: The goal is to gather relevant job-related data in a short period. Be careful of too much soft talk.
Evaluate candidates after the interview: The interview is geared toward gathering facts and documenting those by taking notes. Do not make too early judgments but wait until after the interview.
Take notes: Listen carefully to the responses and stick to the facts. Don’t write your opinions or what you think was said.
Remember, conducting fair and constructive interviews helps ensure that you attract top talent and create a positive candidate experience, even if they are not ultimately selected for the position.
Software Engineer
8 个月Not stupid. Humans need pleasure and fun too. Lots of stress in work life. Please do not make an interview serious and strict. All questions are perfectly ok, but still data science is better. I personally conducted an interview and it is biased, judgemental, does not care about the interviewer not giving food, etc., After that I rejected all interviews
Award Winning Visionary Leader 2024?Education Innovation Strategist with AI?Futurist?Professor?Entrepreneur?Public Speaker?Author
8 个月Lol. I had no idea. Personally, being a #data guy, I prefer going the assessment route to support finding great candidates, leaving the interview as one of the last steps because it has within the process, bias, judgement, etc... While necessary to get to the interview, the right assessment can find diamonds in the rough, and eliminate those candidates that just wouldn't fit in, and that, mostly automated. Perhaps you can avoid many stupid questions with a process like this. lol