90 Percent of Everything Is Crap
Shutterstock

90 Percent of Everything Is Crap

Learning this one adage can release you to focus on what matters.

What’s the difference between a performance culture that focuses on the positive and one that focuses on the negative?

It’s okay to focus on the negative—the misses and the missteps—in defining performance, but success doesn’t live in the negative.

Here’s a funny observation: When we are down on people and processes and investments and strategies, we focus on what’s not performing.  We find the flaws.

You’ve probably seen it in play.  You read the performance review of a person who’s out of favor, and it’s rife with articulation of the negatives. “Fails to do this, avoids this, lacks this, shirks that.”  We become so quick to criticize based on flaws that we don’t realize something critical: Doing so is a losing strategy.  Why?  Because 90 percent of everything is crap.  This phrase, commonly known as Sturgeon’s Law, implores us to evaluate things based on their strengths, not their shortcomings.

Even the best of performers have a flaw, or ten.  If you focus on the negative aspects of people, strategies, and performance, you will inevitably find them, no matter where you search. So the most honest appraisal of anything is to look at the peak of its performance.  It’s to look at the 10 percent of a person’s work that reflects their best effort—what reflects their best performance—and then to compare and act.

I’ve witnessed talent processes that have clearly focused on strengths, and I’ve witnessed others that focused on flaws, but one thing stands out:  Talent systems that focus on flaws reject more good talent than those that focus on strengths.

Why? Because when their talent ecosystem focuses on flaws, business leaders who take on the hardest assignments run the highest risk of being fired, regardless of their intrinsic talent. When the same leader is in a talent ecosystem that focuses on strengths, their tough assignments become opportunities to show strengths that are not evident in other circumstances.  At worst, a very strong manager in a tough situation gets reassigned, not resigned to the dustbin.

The same can be said for strategy.  A strategy that racks up a few losses early can be thrown out when flaws are the focus, but long-term success depends on defining strengths, not avoiding weaknesses.

So, 90 percent of everything is crap.  Knowing that, focus on the strengths in the people and concepts around you.

Now, it's your turn.  How do you do cut through the crap and focus on strengths in your own professional life?

Geoff Wilson is a strategy executive focused on the articulation of practical strategic principles for leadership and performance. He is Founder and Principal of Wilson Growth Partners LLC, a management consulting firm.

Follow on twitter: @GeoffTWilson

Enjoyed the article? Please like and share it.

Visit the Wilson Growth Partners, LLC Blog to engage on this and other posts.

Dave Belgrad

Regional Manager - iMobilizeBiz.com

8 年

Well, when you put it that way... ;)

回复
Al Dant

AW Chesterton

9 年

Good article Steve!

回复
Craig Kensek

Strategy | Corporate Marketing | Product Marketing | Marketing Management | Director | Communication | Cybersecurity

9 年

I'm with Gurmeet. Signs regarding the Pareto Principle and Achkamm's (sp) Razor should be inconspicuous locations in every organization. What would people do with all that extra time, not having to put together monster slide decks, fewer meetings to go to.....?

Gurmeet Kaur

Senior Manager, Operations Excellence

9 年

Its a very valid point you make. This can also be associated with the Pareto Principle where we should focus on the effective areas (20%) and eliminate the rest (80%), thus optimizing performance. Although in my experience I've observed that people enjoy focusing more on the "crap"!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Geoff Wilson的更多文章

  • What Makes A Great Company?

    What Makes A Great Company?

    Enduring companies share some common traits. How's yours doing? When do companies become great? When do they become…

    3 条评论
  • 5 Ways To Be More Strategic This Year

    5 Ways To Be More Strategic This Year

    In strategy, it's sometimes the little things that make you better. Here are 5 for the new year.

    11 条评论
  • The Alchemy of Apple's Strategy

    The Alchemy of Apple's Strategy

    Apple created a culture of freedom and playfulness out of a product philosophy of absolute control. It was all about…

    3 条评论
  • 5 Experiences You Need

    5 Experiences You Need

    My career has been shaped by 5 core experience types. Perhaps those just starting out can get something out of these…

    7 条评论
  • Independence Day and Leadership Tyrannies

    Independence Day and Leadership Tyrannies

    Maybe the Declaration of Independence has some seeds of wisdom for those of us who would govern or follow within even…

    1 条评论
  • Your Sleeping Dogs Can Bite You

    Your Sleeping Dogs Can Bite You

    In sales, customer service, and leadership, the cultivation of ignorant customers and followers is common, and…

    2 条评论
  • How Improv Can Reinforce Your Strategy

    How Improv Can Reinforce Your Strategy

    For business strategists to be flexible and responsive, they must work like the best of improv performers. A few months…

    2 条评论
  • It's Never The Audience's Fault

    It's Never The Audience's Fault

    A core tenet of performance applies to the ethics of leadership. How many times have you heard these things? He just…

    2 条评论
  • 6 Challenges Today's Executives Face

    6 Challenges Today's Executives Face

    Today's executives face many common challenges, regardless of their sector, function, or aspiration. The context of…

    7 条评论
  • If You Lead Like Jazz...Leave the Symphony!

    If You Lead Like Jazz...Leave the Symphony!

    If you lead like a jazz artist, then trying to conform to a leadership culture that runs like a symphony might not be…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了