7 things to think about voice

7 things to think about voice

The next few years will see voice automation take over many aspects of our lives. Although voice won’t change everything, it will be part of a movement that heralds a new way to think about our relationship with devices, screens, our data and interactions.

We will become more task-specific and less program-oriented. We will think less about items and more about the collective experience of the device ecosystem they are part of. We will enjoy the experiences they make possible, not the specifications they celebrate.

In the new world I hope we relinquish our role from the slaves we are today to be being back in control.

Voice won’t kill anything

The standard way that technology arrives is to augment more than replace. TV didn’t kill the radio. VHS and then streamed movies didn’t kill the cinema. The microwave didn’t destroy the cooker.

Voice more than anything else is a way for people to get outputs from and give inputs into machines; it is a type of user interface. With UI design we’ve had the era of punch cards in the 1940s, keyboards from the 1960s, the computer mouse from the 1970s and the touchscreen from the 2000s.

All four of these mechanisms are around today and, with the exception of the punch card, we freely move between all input types based on context. Touchscreens are terrible in cars and on gym equipment, but they are great at making tactile applications. Computer mice are great to point and click. Each input does very different things brilliantly and badly. We have learned to know what is the best use for each.

Voice will not kill brands, it won’t hurt keyboard sales or touchscreen devices — it will become an additional way to do stuff; it is incremental, not cannibalistic.

We need to design around it

Nobody wanted the computer mouse before it was invented. In fact, many were perplexed by it because it made no sense in the previous era, where we used command lines, not visual icons, to navigate. Working with Nokia on touchscreens before the iPhone, the user experience sucked because the operating system wasn’t designed for touch. 3D Touch still remains pathetic because few software designers got excited by it and built for it.

What is exciting about voice is not using ways to add voice interaction to current systems, but considering new applications/interactions/use cases we’ve never seen.

At the moment, the burden is on us to fit around the limitations of voice, rather than have voice work around our needs.

A great new facade

Have you ever noticed that most company desktop websites are their worst digital interface; their mobile site is likely better and the mobile app will be best. Most airline or hotel or bank apps don’t offer pared-down experiences (like was once the case), but their very fastest, slickest experience with the greatest functionality. What tends to happen is that new things get new cap ex, the best people and the most ability to bring change.

However, most digital interfaces are still designed around the silos, workflows and structures of the company that made them. Banks may offer eight different ways to send money to someone or something based around their departments; hotel chains may ask you to navigate by their brand of hotel, not by location.

The reality is that people are task-oriented, not process-oriented. They want an outcome and don’t care how. Do I give a crap if it’s Amazon Grocery or Amazon Fresh or Amazon Marketplace? Not one bit. Voice allows companies to build a new interface on top of the legacy crap they’ve inherited. I get to “send money to Jane today,” not press 10 buttons around their org chart.

It requires rethinking

The first time I showed my parents a mouse and told them to double-click on it I thought they were having a fit on it. The cursor would move in jerks and often get lost. The same dismay and disdain I once had for them, I now feel every time I try to use voice. I have to reprogram my brain to think about information in a new way and to reconsider how my brain works. While this will happen, it will take time.

What gets interesting is what happens to the 8-year-olds who grow up thinking of voice first, what happens when developing nations embrace tablets with voice not desktop PCs to educate. When people grow up with something, their native understanding of what it means and what it makes possible changes. It’s going to be fascinating to see what becomes of this canvas.

Voice as a connective layer

We keep being dumb and thinking of voice as being the way to interact with “a” machine and not as a glue between all machines. Voice is an inherently crap way to get outputs; if a picture states a thousand words, how long will it take to buy a t-shirt. The real value of voice is as a user interface across all devices. Advertising in magazines should offer voice commands to find out more. You should be able to yell at the Netflix carousel, or at TV ads to add products to your shopping list. Voice won’t be how we “do” entire things, it will be how we trigger or finish things.

Proactivity

We’ve only ever assumed we talked to devices first. Do I really want to remember the command for turning on lights in the home and utter six words to make it happen? Do I want to always be asking. Assuming devices are select in when they speak first, it’s fun to see what happens when voice is proactive. Imagine the possibilities:

  • “Welcome home, would you like me to select evening lighting?”
  • “You’re running late for a meeting, should I order an Uber to take you there?”
  • “Your normal Citi Bike station has no bikes right now.”
  • “While it looks sunny now, it’s going to rain later.”

Automation

While many think we don’t want to share personal information, there are ample signs that if we get something in return, we trust the company and there is transparency, it’s OK. Voice will not develop alone, it will progress alongside Google suggesting emails replies, Amazon suggesting things to buy, Siri contextually suggesting apps to use. We will slowly become used to the idea of outsourcing our thinking and decisions somewhat to machines.

We’ve already outsourced a lot; we can’t remember phone numbers, addresses, birthdays — we even rely on images to jar our recollection of experiences, so it’s natural we’ll outsource some decisions.

The medium-term future in my eyes is one where we allow more data to be used to automate the mundane. Many think that voice is asking Alexa to order Duracell batteries, but it’s more likely to be never thinking about batteries or laundry detergent or other low consideration items again nor the subscriptions to be replenished.

There is an expression that a computer should never ask a question for which it can reasonably deduce the answer itself. When a technology is really here we don’t see, notice or think about it. The next few years will see voice automation take over many more aspects of our lives. The future of voice may be some long sentences and some smart commands, but mostly perhaps it’s simply grunts of yes.

This piece first appeared in TechCrunch.


Charles Mahoney

Design and Technology Educator, Engineering Leader, Innovator

6 年

I agree, Tom, that Voice will not replace other UIs, but I think the trend today is to put Voice into everything "because we can!" without regard to the advantage or disadvantage. This, of course, is what happens when Marketers and Product Managers drive design decisions, but I digress. I think Voice is appropriate in certain situations, and not in others. For example, Voice is best in an automobile, where taking your hands off the wheel to press buttons, or looking at a screen is downright dangerous. In the home, the best UI for turning on a light is the simple light switch - no ambiguity, easily understood, no firmware updates needed. SImple TV functions are better with a remote, but Voice really shines in search applications, and here, Voice with AI can really simplify finding and recording programs to watch. Voice is an augmenter, not a replacement technology.

回复
Graeme Finch

New Nuclear Professional

6 年

You should be able to yell at the Netflix carousel. Fascinating, we have a Smart TV Panasonic high end. It's hilarious, switch on voice control, leave the?volume at ambient and watch the TV exasperate itself as it picks up the voices from it's own speakers.

回复
Loek Luijbregts

?? Strategy, Media, Activations | 70MiO impressions & 2Mio prints | Brand, destination and creator collaborations | Founder of Cycling Incubators - stories for riders by riders

6 年

Simone de Weijer Iris Nieuwboer "Nobody wanted the computer mouse before it was invented. In fact, many were perplexed by it because it made no sense in the previous era"

回复
Doug Gowans

Advisory Solution Consultant ...working for the worlds most innovative tech companies...

6 年

Business are increasingly investing big sums in change programs to change the user to fit the technology it seems. Why can't the technology be a more natural fit for how we already work? Voice can be transformational because of this... (excuse the self promotion but I wrote about this some time back...) https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/could-alexa-business-first-technology-actually-introduce-doug-gowans/

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tom Goodwin的更多文章

  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 30

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 30

    Living in the Year 2030, AI Companies Don’t Actually Like You Using AI, Amazon is a Mess, TV Ads Are About to Get…

    8 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 29

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 29

    Saudi's Skyline Dreams, More Time for TikTok, Excel will outlive us all, and The Future of Work Big One’s Thoughts from…

    9 条评论
  • Envisioning the Unimaginable: AI PCs and the Power of Possibility

    Envisioning the Unimaginable: AI PCs and the Power of Possibility

    As the expression goes, “First we shape our tools, then they shape us”, and now we’re in the most exciting period of…

    12 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 28

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 28

    Scott Galloway talks about Brexit, Are AI Influencers really the future of marketing, Nobody Cares, and is AI really…

    15 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 27

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 27

    The Ghost of Twitter's Past haunts me, What is Zuckerberg doing, and will "Made In China" cars be no more in the US?…

    5 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 25

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 25

    Why my wallet is so bulky, Japan's Juxtaposition, unplugging from work, and no your phone is not spying on you. As…

    4 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 24

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 24

    Tech tensions as the AI hype cycle continues. Plus: hyperabundance, why change management is broken, the Woozle effect,…

    8 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 23

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 23

    Some more on Gen ai (of course!), crazy shoe designs, self check outs, medication and some other jazz..

    6 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 22

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 22

    This was posted one week ago to my Substack. Here - https://tomgoodwin.

    4 条评论
  • Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 21

    Nowism by Tom Goodwin - Edition 21

    This was posted one week ago to my Substack. It's here I'm trying to get people to move over and subscribe there, but…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了