7 Key Steps for Ensuring Responsible AI Use in Recruitment

The integration of AI in life science recruitment is already reshaping hiring processes by offering increased efficiency, automation, and the potential to make more data-driven hiring decisions. For recruiters and hiring managers, AI tools can streamline sourcing, screening, and selection, providing an invaluable resource in a challenging job market.

However, as outlined in the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology’s (DSIT) Responsible AI in Recruitment guidance, the use of AI in recruitment also poses its own risks, from perpetuating biases to excluding certain demographics. As a recruiter, it’s your responsibility to ensure your AI systems are both effective and ethical, and that they adhere to the principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, and compliance with regulatory standards.

Here, we’ve taken some of the key points highlighted by the DSIT earlier this year to introduce you to some of the key principles of responsible AI use. To access the full guide and for the latest updates on responsible AI use, please visit the UK government website here.

Defining a Clear Purpose for AI Implementation

Before integrating AI into recruitment processes, it’s essential to clearly define its intended purpose. According to the DSIT guidance, organisations should begin by identifying the specific challenges they aim to address through AI and evaluating if these challenges align with the AI system’s capabilities. For instance, if the goal is to streamline initial candidate engagement, a chatbot may be appropriate. However, for tasks requiring nuanced judgement, such as assessing a candidate’s cultural fit, AI might not be suitable.

To define functionality, you should set specific, measurable outcomes. For instance, if the AI system is used for CV screening, it should produce a list of qualified candidates based on objective criteria. Regular consultations with suppliers can help you understand current capabilities and ensure the technology aligns with organisational objectives.

Prioritising Accessibility and Equality

A significant risk of using AI in recruitment is the potential for digital exclusion and bias against certain applicant groups. The DSIT guidance underscores that organisations have a legal obligation under the Equality Act 2010 to ensure AI systems do not disadvantage individuals based on age, disability, or socioeconomic status. When evaluating AI tools, you should carefully examine if the technology could create barriers for candidates with protected characteristics. Certain AI systems may inadvertently amplify biases by using historical data, which may reflect discriminatory hiring practices. Targeted advertising tools are particularly susceptible, as they often rely on demographic profiling that can unintentionally reinforce stereotypes.

To mitigate such risks, you can implement an AI governance framework that includes accessibility and bias checks. Accessibility features, such as text-to-speech or alternative application methods, should be available to guarantee an inclusive hiring practice. The guidance recommends that recruiters plan for reasonable adjustments before deployment, which may include providing a non-AI recruitment pathway for candidates who may face disadvantages due to the AI’s limitations.

Upholding Data Protection and Privacy Standards

Maintaining data privacy and protection is vital when deploying AI in recruitment. The DSIT guidance highlights the importance of conducting a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) to identify and address privacy risks associated with AI. You must ensure that any AI systems comply with the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), particularly if these systems are used to make automated decisions that impact candidates, such as CV-screening tools that process personal data to shortlist candidates.

Transparency is also a key principle. As per the DSIT guidance, organisations should inform candidates when AI tools are being used in the recruitment process. This allows candidates to understand and potentially contest AI-driven decisions, enhancing trust in the hiring process. To meet these requirements, you should work with your suppliers to develop a clear data governance strategy, ensuring compliance with both internal policies and regulatory standards.

Establishing a Robust AI Governance Framework

An AI governance framework provides a structured approach to embedding AI into recruitment responsibly. The DSIT guidance recommends that you create a governance framework that outlines accountability measures, risk management practices, and methods for transparency. This framework should assign specific roles for overseeing AI, including who is responsible for monitoring its performance and addressing issues as they arise.

Stakeholder engagement is also a critical component. Regular consultations with internal teams, such as HR, legal, and IT, as well as external stakeholders, can help identify potential risks and ensure the system aligns with organisational goals. As the DSIT guidance notes, organisations should remain flexible, updating the governance framework as the AI system evolves and new insights emerge.

Ensuring Vendor Accountability During Procurement

When procuring AI tools, it’s essential to evaluate suppliers’ claims about system performance, accuracy, and fairness. The DSIT guidance advises recruiters to request documentation, such as model cards, bias audits, and impact assessments, from vendors to substantiate their claims. For example, if a supplier promotes a CV-screening tool as unbiased, you should request evidence of bias audits that evaluate performance across different demographic groups.

The DSIT guidance also recommends asking vendors for regular updates on system performance and data privacy practices. This ongoing engagement ensures the AI system remains compliant with current regulations and continues to meet the organisation’s requirements.

Conducting Pre-Deployment Testing and Adjustments

Once an AI tool is procured, the DSIT guidance recommends piloting it before full deployment. Piloting AI with a diverse group of users, including candidates from various backgrounds, can reveal biases or limitations in system performance.

You should also plan for reasonable adjustments to assist candidates who may be disadvantaged by AI tools. If an AI tool cannot accommodate an applicant’s needs, you should offer alternative formats to promote equal access.

Implementing Ongoing Monitoring and Feedback Channels

AI in recruitment requires continuous oversight to maintain its effectiveness and fairness. According to the DSIT guidance, recruiters should set up systems for iterative monitoring, including bias audits and performance evaluations, to ensure the AI system remains compliant and accurate over time. Model drift, where AI performance degrades due to changes in data or real-world conditions, is a known issue in live AI applications, and regular audits help identify and address such problems early on.

The DSIT guidance also emphasises the importance of a user feedback system, allowing both candidates and recruiters to report issues with AI tools. Feedback channels, such as chatbots, surveys, or a contact form, provide an additional layer of oversight, enabling you to address unintended harms quickly.

Read the full DSIT guidance here.

Get Help With Your Hiring

Want to find out more about how we can connect you with top life science talent? Visit our new recruiter website here.