# 61: AI at a Crossroads: Innovation, Regulation, and Human Influence

Are you looking to enhance your predictive and prescriptive analytics with Generative AI?

This latest Gartner research (link accesible to Gartner members) lead authored by me delves into transforming isolated insights into a cohesive decision-making framework, elevating your analysis from reporting to scenario planning and comprehensive simulations.

Predictive and prescriptive analytics are essential for data and analytics leaders aiming to enhance decision making. By integrating generative AI (GenAI), these tools can be further augmented, expanding their impact and reach, securing competitive advantage, and driving superior value outcomes.

Used together, predictive, prescriptive and GenAI-based techniques enable data and analytics leaders to ask and answer more complex and more complete questions in a timely and repeatable way.

The State of AI Testing in Medicine: A Call for Rigor

AI in medicine holds great promise, but its testing and validation are currently disorganized and inadequate. Despite numerous AI-driven medical tools being approved by regulators like the FDA, many lack thorough clinical validation, raising concerns about their safety and effectiveness.

Devin Singh's work on AI to reduce emergency department wait times shows the potential of these tools. However, real-world implementation is challenging, requiring more than initial studies. The testing of medical AI is inconsistent, with many tools influencing patient care despite limited evidence. Regulatory standards for AI devices are lower than those for drugs, leading to a proliferation of inadequately tested tools.

Key issues include the sensitivity of AI tools to different patient populations and environments, clinician "alert fatigue," and the lack of standardized patient consent processes. Experts argue for a more rigorous, standardized approach to testing AI in healthcare, with some advocating for centralized assurance laboratories and others stressing the importance of local validation.

AI's potential in medicine can only be fully realized with a more structured and rigorous testing process, ensuring that these tools are both safe and effective in improving patient care.

California AI Bill Sparks Debate in Silicon Valley

A proposed California bill, the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, aims to regulate the development of powerful AI models. While intended to ensure safety and accountability, the bill has ignited a heated debate in Silicon Valley, with critics arguing it could stifle innovation.

State Senator Scott Wiener, who introduced the bill, emphasizes the need for proactive regulation to mitigate AI risks while fostering innovation. However, critics, including prominent figures like Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and AI expert Fei-Fei Li, warn that the bill could harm AI research, startups, and the open-source community.

Supporters like AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton argue that strong AI regulation is necessary, and California is the right place to start. Meanwhile, some AI companies, including OpenAI, express concerns over potential fragmentation of regulations across states.

As California moves forward with this legislation, the tech community remains divided over whether the bill represents a necessary safeguard or a threat to the future of AI innovation.

We train AI, AI trains us!

Humans Change Behavior When Training AI: Study Reveals Key Insights

A new study by Washington University in St. Louis has revealed that when people believe they are training AI, they tend to modify their behavior to appear more fair and just. This finding, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), suggests that the process of training AI influences human decision-making, with potential implications for AI development.

The study, led by PhD student Lauren Treiman, involved participants playing a bargaining game where some were told their decisions would train an AI. Those participants consistently made more equitable choices, even at a personal cost, and continued this behavior even after being informed their decisions were no longer influencing AI training.

This behavior highlights the critical human element in AI training, as biases introduced during this process can impact the fairness and effectiveness of AI systems. The researchers emphasize the importance of understanding the psychological factors that shape human decisions when developing AI, as these can significantly influence the outcomes of AI deployment in real-world applications.

The study underscores the need for AI developers to account for human behavior and biases during the training process to create more equitable and accurate AI systems.

Signing Off

Why did the AI start a workout routine with its human trainer?

Because it wanted to stay in cyber-shape—after all, we train AI, and AI trains us back!

Keep an eye on our upcoming editions for in-depth discussions on specific AI trends, expert insights, and answers to your most pressing AI questions!

Stay connected for more updates and insights in the dynamic world of AI.

For any feedback or topics you'd like us to cover, feel free to contact me via LinkedIn.

DEEPakAI: AI Demystifed Demystifying AI, one newsletter at a time!

p.s. - The newsletter includes smart prompt based LLM generated content. The views and opinions expressed in the newsletter are my personal views and opinions.