#55 - Numbers vs. percentages, scope drift, Customer AI for marketing, and lots more
Welcome to my 55th Customer Analytics Newsletter here on LinkedIn. A reasonably comprehensive list of topics this time:
As always, if you enjoy reading this, please forward to friends and colleagues, encouraging them to subscribe.
Communication tip: when to use numbers and when to use percentages
As Dan Ariely says, and as I like to repeat, “We humans are predictably irrational.” Insights into the nature of our irrationality will help you be a more effective communicator, and more importantly, more effective at persuading people to act.
I find one aspect of this to be particularly interesting: we all find percentages to be pretty boring, and absolute numbers to be highly persuasive. For example, one study showed that people told about a disease that “kills 1,286 people out of every 10,000” believed it to be more dangerous than “a disease that kills 24.14% of the population.” (Please get your calculator out if you also jumped to the wrong conclusion.) The imagery of the absolute number overwhelms the relatively abstract notion of a percentage. The former grabs your attention andthe latter makes you want to yawn. The version to use depends on what you want to accomplish.
Taking this into the area of CX and Customer Success, there is a huge difference between saying “1.37% of our customers will leave us because of this” and “387 customers will probably leave us because of this, and we know which ones they are.” The facts may be almost the same, but our reaction is not. The catch for CX professionals is that our obsolete survey-based methodologies give us a pecentage but do not provide accurate absolute numbers. Customer AI provides the details for 100% of your base, so you can be far more persuasive.
Beware of scope drift
Please take a moment to think about a never-ending project in which you have participated. Almost all of us have experienced a number of these. The most common cause is what is known as scope creep. The scope of the project has never been clearly defined, and is constantly adjusted. There are a number of techniques for avoiding this, and I particularly recommend the use of completion criteria when you first define a project. Don't do this as you go along, simply because it will be almost impossible to reach an agreement. Let's consider an example:
If your overall customer experience initiative includes a project to implement a new executive feedback process for your largest customers, some completion criteria might be:
领英推荐
Completion criteria need to be agreed before the project starts. Please think about this as you launch your now-essential Customer AI project. Yes, it is possible to implement it within three months, provided you are clear on what the implementation success criteria are from the start. Scope drift is your enemy. Stamp it out now!
More content from OCX Cognition
Interesting content from elsewhere
Notes
OCX Cognition predicts customer futures. Our breakthrough Customer AI solution lets enterprises transform what’s possible in customer experience. Reduce your customer risk, break down silos, and drive speedy action – when you can see what’s coming, you can change the outcome. Building on more than 100 years of CX-focused expertise in our small team and thousands in teams we have led, we’ve harnessed today’s advances in AI, elastic computing, and data science to deliver on the promise of customer-driven financial results. Learn more at?www.ocxcognition.com.
Maurice FitzGerald is Editor-in-Chief, Content at OCX Cognition. He retired from HP where he was VP of Customer Experience for their $4 billion software business and was previously VP of Strategy and Customer Experience as well as Chief of Staff for HP in EMEA. He and his brother Peter, an Oxford D.Phil in Cognitive Psychology, have written three books on customer experience strategy and NPS, and a fourth book that focuses on Peter's cartoon illustrations for the first three. All are available from Amazon.
Associate Professor, Project and Programme Management, University of Limerick
1 年Maurice I would take a slightly different approach to the completion criteria in the scope drift section. The first thing you need to do is establish the benefits/value the project will deliver to the organisation -preferably aligned to the strategic goals- in this case I'm thinking of percentage increase in retention of your large customers, increase in sales revenue, improvement in CSAT. These benefits can be monetized and tracked via benefits realisation methodologies. Going back to your previous comments about sponsorship, with the benefits/value clearly articulated the project stand a better chance of getting senior management support/approval and less likely to be closed down. So by all means track the completion criteria but focus on the benefits.