A $50 fine won't stop anyone from texting and walking

A $50 fine won't stop anyone from texting and walking

Nobody should be looking at a smartphone while crossing the road. But do we really need the government to tell us that, much less impose fines if we make such a bad decision?

If you’re not dissuaded from texting by the prospect of being hit by a car traveling at 60 kilometers per hour, are you likely to put down your phone just because now there’s a small chance someone will give you a $50 ticket? And if $50 doesn’t work the first time, why would a $75 fine dissuade you the next time?

I understand why other pedestrians and drivers find it annoying when someone is walking and texting but is there really evidence that it’s a significant safety problem? Are pedestrians regularly walking off curbs and crossing on red lights? Or is it just that many of us find the behaviour irritating and wish someone would do something about it? Fines and penalties seem to have done very little to discourage drivers from using their smartphones. Why would it be any different for pedestrians?

Listen for 60 Seconds with Sutcliffe weekdays at 6:20 am, 8:20 am, 4:20 pm and 6:20 pm on 1310 NEWS. And join me and my guests on Ottawa Today, featuring discussion and analysis of the big stories of the day, weekdays from 9:00 am to 1:00 pm.

Kevin Brown

Enterprise Architect specializing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Contact Centers

7 年

I don't like heavy handed government, but how are we to rid ourselves of these fools short of Darwinian selection? Should all cars be fitted with roo-bars and drivers told to "hit 'em hard and hit 'em fast?"

  • 该图片无替代文字
回复
Michael Beveridge

President at Mejk??l

7 年

More government “Revenue tools”.

A women standing on the road talking on her cellphone was struck by a vehicle after three warning toots had failed to move her. The driver was punished because she had done nothing wrong/ illegal. This may be less about the feared nanny state than slippery legalistic insurance companies and our unfortunate adversarial common law tradition. Reasonable people do not need the government telling them what to do, as for the unreasonable and their advocates it not as straight forward as the reasonable think it should be.

回复

We need less interference from government not more.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Sutcliffe的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了