5 Ways DEI Has Been Ineffective And How We Make It Better
Photo by Yan Krukau: https://www.pexels.com/photo/man-in-white-dress-shirt-covering-his-face-7640484/

5 Ways DEI Has Been Ineffective And How We Make It Better

If you listen to critics, the field of diversity, equity, and inclusion, known by its initialism DEI, is racist, anti-white, and should stand for “discrimination, exclusion and indoctrination.” Anti-DEI sentiments have gained more traction since the ending of affirmative action, with Elon Musk fanning the flames recently when he tweeted that “DEI must DIE.” Despite the many straw man arguments employed by the loudest anti-DEI voices, there are several valid critiques of the field. This article explores these critiques in more detail and highlights strategies to improve the field.

1. Lack of institutional power. One of the reasons for DEI’s ineffectiveness has been the lack of institutional power that DEI heads and DEI departments actually have to create organization-wide changes. Many DEI leaders are made the sacrificial lambs within their organizations when things go wrong but are not given the resources or even the team needed to actually move the needle. Many workplaces hire DEI practitioners and give them fancy salaries and fancy titles but require them to report to the human resource department or the chief human resource officer, and when DEI leaders try to make changes, they often experience barrier after barrier. In many workplaces, those engaged in much of DEI work are junior-level employees serving on DEI councils and committees or those in employee resource groups. Failing to give these individuals the institutional power they need to create changes sets DEI up for failure.

Overcoming the lack of institutional power that DEI practitioners often have requires workplaces to grant those doing DEI work the ability to make systemic changes. DEI should not be reporting to human resources. DEI leaders should have access to HR data and should be granted the same level of decision-making power as chief executives. In addition, we must understand that one person can rarely change an entire organization, so there should be a DEI team with the power and resources to make organization-wide changes without having to jump through a bunch of hoops.

2. No accountability. When DEI programs are created, they are often done with the best intentions but no matter how well-intentioned these programs are, they fail to achieve their desired results because of a lack of accountability. Regardless of how many sponsorship programs are created and how many affinity groups are implemented, DEI will fail when those in positions of power aren’t held accountable for their actions and when those same people in power aren’t held accountable to DEI objectives. What’s the point of setting DEI goals with zero intention of accomplishing them? It’s all for the performance. Many organizations have zero intentions of achieving DEI objectives but simply hire folks into DEI positions and make company-wide proclamations to virtue signal and convince the public that DEI is something that is valued.

3. Surface-level DEI initiatives. Many DEI initiatives are surface-level and don’t address systemic issues. Celebrating cultural heritage months, having safe space conversations, and book clubs are nice, but these activities don’t address systemic problems. A popular DEI initiative that has been the go-to for many organizations, especially following a public faux pas, misstep, or blunder, was the almighty unconscious bias training—but this type of training and other DEI initiatives often fail to address the systemic issues workplaces are plagued by.

In an ideal world, DEI would never be a reactionary measure; workplaces would be detailed, thorough, and thoughtful with DEI implementation, and structures would be put in place to address inequities. But in the real world, DEI has often been instituted haphazardly and with little consideration for the best interventions to resolve a given issue. Successful DEI efforts will address the root cause of inequities while providing the tools to report and address workplace inequities. Organizations must be willing to overhaul policies and practices that are actively causing harm in order to adopt equity and justice-oriented systems.

4. Refusal to address systemic issues. As mentioned, workplaces often implement surface-level DEI initiatives as a way to avoid addressing systemic issues. Many organizations, for example, refuse to acknowledge the ways that the system of whiteness impacts the workplace. Discussions about whiteness and anti-blackness have become “off-limits” and there is instead a push for conversations about more sanitized topics like allyship, colorblindness, and equality. Effective DEI considers how different systems of oppression (e.g., transphobia, fatphobia, colorism, ableism, etc.) impact employee experiences and results in the development of specific interventions to dismantle and deconstruct these systems in the workplace.

There are several ways to address systemic issues. Inviting educators into the workplace to provide insight into the history and outcomes of different forms of oppression can be a helpful first step. Second, workplace practices must be frequently audited by a neutral party, like an ombudsman or an external consultant, to assess how inequities are able to persist and to provide recommendations for changes. Lastly, leadership must be willing to address systemic issues head-on and make changes when necessary. This can include getting rid of exclusionary practices, instituting a zero-tolerance policy for workplace harm, and consistently applying feedback from employees into workplace structures.

5. Upholding the status quo. It is imperative to have an honest discussion about how, in some cases, DEI practitioners uphold oppressive systems by remaining silent and not pushing back against the status quo in order to maintain their position and power. As stated in a 2022 Forbes article exploring this topic in more detail, “There must be a conversation about the DEI practitioners whose desire for money, power, and prestige supersedes the need to prioritize, center and liberate the most marginalized.” In every industry, there are individuals who have nefarious intentions and DEI is no different. These bad actors do not and should not represent the majority of practitioners who enter the space to be instrumental change agents.

It's difficult to tell who’s really invested in dismantling the oppressive systems that harm us all versus who is more comfortable upholding the status quo. One of the challenges that DEI faces is that there is no governing body presiding over the field so there isn’t always agreement on best practices or the best way to approach DEI. Those who engage in DEI work should not be exempt from interrogation, critique, and criticism. Just like organizational leaders, those who have committed to this work should also be held accountable and are not above reproach if DEI is ever to become a catalyst for workplace change and transformation.

This article was originally published in Forbes.

Order my new book Decentering Whiteness in the Workplace!

?

Click here if you’d like a discounted author-signed copy of Decentering Whiteness in the Workplace!

About The Pink Elephant newsletter: The Pink Elephant newsletter is a weekly LinkedIn newsletter designed to stimulate critical and relevant dialogue that centers around topics of race and racial equity. If you enjoyed this newsletter, please share with others you feel would gain value from it. If you’d like to get free tips on diversity, equity, and inclusion, sign up for Dr. Janice’s free newsletter through her website. The newsletter is curated by Janice Gassam Asare, Ph.D. who is a writer, TEDx speaker, consultant, educator, and self-proclaimed foodie. Janice is the host of the Dirty Diversity podcast, where she explores diversity, equity and inclusion in more detail. Dr. Janice’s work is centered around the dismantling of oppressive systems while amplifying the voices and needs of the most marginalized folks. If you are seeking guidance and consultation around diversity, equity, and inclusion in your workplace, visit the website to learn more about services that can be tailored to your specific needs or book a FREE 15-minute consultation call to learn more about how your organization or institution can benefit from Dr. Janice’s expertise. Add yourself to the email list so you can receive more free resources!

Additional Resources

·????? Schedule a 15-minute “Ask Dr. J” session to answer your racial equity questions

·????? My Tips for Aspiring DEI Consultants YOUTUBE VIDEO

·????? Understanding how the White Gaze Shows Up in Your Workplace ARTICLE

·????? Support the Okra Project?-?a collective that seeks to address the global crisis faced by Black Trans people by bringing home cooked, healthy, and culturally specific meals and resources to Black Trans People


Jason Weppelman

Strategic Outreach Manager at Rangam Consultants

10 个月

Enjoyed the article. I think the overarching point is 100% correct. DEI at a company only works if it is empowered and if it is pointed at solutions. It's often set up as just a person. The budget, is that person. It's fulfilling some need for a positive facing positioning. Not an actual goal. The best thing that can be done (at least on a company level) is to set specific things you want to see with DEI. Maybe even focus on specific underserved populations. I had success in the disability/autism world as companies wanted to target that population for training on awareness and hiring. Not just vague, lets be diverse generalities. But more importantly, they invested MONEY! So results were expected.

回复
Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede

Professor at Chalmers University of Technology

10 个月

So true! I experienced all of this when I led gender initiative https://www.biophysics.org/blog/why-i-quit-the-gender-initiative-after-4-years

Jenn Tardy

??LinkedIn Top Voice | Diversity Recruitment Training & Consulting | ??I help workplaces increase diversity and retention WITHOUT harm. ??

10 个月

What a great article, friend! (Janice Gassam Asare, Ph.D.) I remember the day that I learned about "positioning." As to your point #1 in the article, it does not matter what role you were brought into, if you do not have the right level of positioning (i.e., power and authority to carry out that which you were hired to do - especially the hard stuff), you will not be successful in that role. And you are right - that is exactly what we are seeing in the world of DEI.

回复
Keisha Rembert

Learner| Educator| Leader| Best-Selling Author| Passionate Equity Advocate

10 个月

YES, "?Successful DEI efforts will address the root cause of inequities while providing the tools to report and address workplace inequities. Organizations must be willing to overhaul policies and practices that are actively causing harm in order to adopt equity and justice-oriented systems."

回复

I was severely impacted by a fortune 40 company that failed in each of these categories. After enduring 18 months of harassment and targeting and not receiving and relief from HR, Leadership, or the Chief of Diversity I email the CEO. As chairman of the board and CEO he has responsibility for the shareholder’s best interest as well as employee wellbeing and safety. With his name on the Building, The web Domain, and as the brand this was my last resort. He never responded and I was laid off 2 weeks later while out on Approved Short Term Disability. I was diagnosed with PTSD from these experiences. To date, it’s been almost three years and I still have not received anything other than delays from their legal team and have depositions and arbitration eventually coming. This has changed me. In pursuit of healing, I assembled a team to build a solution to this issue for employees and business, One2Gration & Diverse Perspectives . Through our #Respocial services we have already began helping others stand for themselves. To learn more and or join, Https://one2gration.com/ Https://community.one2gration.com/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了