#5 Story Points

Hello,

Get ready to make sense of what's happening in the tech world with Story Points—because technology runs in binary, but news is rarely one and zeroes.

News sprint

1. Google is working on it’s security. There is a new, paid, Premium version of Chrome with better security, and Google Workspace released a new multi-admin approval feature. #security
2. Sequoia introduces a model to grasp product-market fit (PMF) through three clear archetypes: "Hair on Fire" (addressing an urgent, evident need in a competitive market), "Hard Fact" (solving a problem customers consider an accepted reality), and "Future Vision" (pioneering a new reality with visionary innovation). #business
3. Carta has published insights on the startup ecosystem in our latest State of Private Markets report for Q1 2024. #funding
4. Mira Murati, OpenAI CTO, discusses the future of Sora, chatGPT-5, and AI market #AI
5. For fledgling SaaS companies that lack extensive long-term retention data, the CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) payback period emerges as a more pragmatic metric compared to CAC/LTV (Lifetime Value).? #business

Retrospective

LLI's team comments on the interview with Mira Murati.?

Mira Murati's “I don’t know” response in the interview underscores a critical aspect of AI training that often remains opaque: the origin of training data, particularly videos sourced from various platforms.

The interviewer's question, probing into the sources of training videos, highlights the complex ethical landscape surrounding data acquisition for AI. Interestingly, this practice, while potentially legal, raises significant questions about intellectual property rights and fair compensation for original content creators. The ongoing legal case involving the New York Times, OpenAI, and Microsoft could serve as a pivotal moment in addressing these concerns.

This case may offer much-needed clarity on whether AI companies can ethically and legally utilize internet data for training without compensating content creators. The outcome could potentially shape future regulations and practices within the AI industry, setting precedents for responsible data acquisition and usage.

But would delegalizing the usage of free internet data stop the companies? The reality is that AI development heavily relies on vast and diverse datasets to achieve optimal performance. If legal restrictions were imposed on the use of freely accessible internet data, companies might resort to alternative methods or find loopholes to acquire similar datasets. Additionally, the global nature of the internet makes enforcing such restrictions challenging, as data can easily cross international borders. Instead of outright prohibition, the focus should shift towards establishing clear guidelines and frameworks that ensure fair compensation and ethical usage of data while fostering innovation and development in the AI industry.?

Furthermore, even if fines were imposed on AI companies for unauthorized use of internet data, there's a valid concern that the penalties might not be significant deterrents, especially for large corporations with substantial resources. The company with the most users and financial power could potentially view fines as a minor cost of doing business compared to the value derived from accessing vast datasets. In such scenarios, fines might indeed be less expensive than legally acquiring data through proper channels or compensating content creators.

This raises broader questions about the effectiveness of traditional regulatory approaches in the context of rapidly evolving technologies like AI.

The Backlog

Have you ever wondered how to choose the perfect software development partner?

Our article sheds light on the crucial considerations for choosing a software development partner that suits your requirements. Even if you're not issuing an RFP, these insider tips will help you make informed decisions about your next tech project.

Link to the article.