5 Reasons We Should Remember the “Good Old Days” of Recruitment

5 Reasons We Should Remember the “Good Old Days” of Recruitment

Hopefully we all have our own personal history that we look back on with fondness and nostalgia.

It could be a childhood vacation, being away from home for the first time to attend University, or the birth of your first child.

But whatever your personal, joyous memory, I’m sure you realise that all nostalgic memories are ever so slightly false.

We look back on happy times through rose-coloured glasses and filter out any difficult or troublesome elements.

There’s nothing wrong with that. Good memories should remain so.

As long as we don’t allow them to ruin our common sense in the present.

When we watch Mad Men, for instance, it’s guilt-tinged fun to chuckle at the hard-drinking, chain-smoking, misogynistic lifestyles of the 60s. But no sane person would really want to work in that kind of environment anymore.

Maybe in 40 years someone will make a TV show about life in the recruitment industry during the 1990s, and we’ll all be delightfully horrified at the testosterone-fuelled antics of money-obsessed recruiters in the 20th century.

It’ll probably feature these five relics of recruitment’s “good old days”…

1.    Lies, Telephone Calls and More Lies

Half the day spent calling businesses using a fake name to try and get the contact details of the decision-makers, and the other half of the day ringing those people, telling a couple of fibs to get past the gatekeepers, all to ask if the client has any vacancies that need filling.

Nostalgia: The thrill of the hunt. The excitement of landing a lead. The competition between recruiters to hit lofty targets.

Reality: Having a manager standing over you, making sure you hit your call targets created a pressurised environment. No matter how much management used bonuses and rewards to drive telephone calls, it was the part of the job that most recruiters hated. And the people receiving the calls didn’t care for it much either.

Modern Recruitment: Contingency recruitment has always and will always be a volume business, so it was a given that recruiters would spend most of their time on the phone using, shall we say, creative techniques for getting a foot in the door.

It was effective, no question. But for every successful telephone call that resulted in an assignment, there were several dozen irritated business people that got cold-called along the way.

Some measure of cold-calling still has its place in modern recruitment, but these days targeted marketing and networking is more effective. And because retained and managed service contracts are the norm, the pressure to make 100 calls a day is a thing of the past.

Quality over quantity is the focus.

2.    Email Blasts to Spam Folders

Half an hour crafting an email. Blast it out to 10,000 people. Sit back and wait.

Nostalgia: Refresh your inbox every 10 minutes, waiting for those opiate receptors in the brain to light up when a lead comes through. Minimum effort for maximum reward.

Reality: Most of those 10,000 had already blocked you. And the rest were hitting “delete”. Success rates were fabulously low but at least it was less troublesome than making telephone calls.

Modern Recruitment: Email regulations are more relaxed for business-to-business marketing, so this “throw mud at the wall” approach still goes on. But it’s far more effective to nurture a smaller list with quality information using a professional opt-in system.

Social media is also very effective for engaging the market and establishing your authority.

Every recruitment campaign produces a handful of disappointed candidates, and it used to be a quick fix to blast their CVs far and wide hoping to land a quick bonus placement. But candidates, and clients for that matter, deserve more care and attention to detail.

Quality candidate and client matches don’t happen through brute force but through careful assessment and consideration.

3.    Mining Databases for Gold

Receive a new assignment and the first job is to email blast the details to every candidate on the database (sometimes including those the recruiter has previously placed – naughty), looking for a quick response.

Nostalgia: A quality vacancy sent to a large database could yield a dozen CVs in a matter of hours. A quick browse to pick out the top five and you can present the client with a quality selection in record time.

Reality: Most candidates quickly became fed up with receiving endless emails. And those who responded positively were often a poor match for the vacancy. The shortlist presented to the client would have had minimal assessment and were a long way from representing the best candidates on the market.

Modern Recruitment: Again, quality over quantity. Candidates can be assessed using competency questionnaires and behavioural surveys to create a well-rounded profile that goes way beyond a mere CV.

Reviewing candidates from previous campaigns is a part of the process but it’s only one step towards gathering a shortlist. A deep dive into the market will turn up quality candidates that aren’t on anyone’s database but are an excellent match for the vacancy.

4.    Creative CV Polishing

An “average” candidate becomes a “great” candidate with a little artistic CV work. A little experience-tweaking here, a little skill-padding there, and the shortlist positively sparkles.

Nostalgia: Placing the candidate that everyone said no one would ever hire is a great feeling. Marketing at its finest.

Reality: The reason why the candidate was struggling to find a placement was because their skillset was lacking and their success rate was below par. It’s great for the candidate that they landed a job, but not so great for the client who has to let their employee go after only a few months.

Modern Recruitment: Marketing a great candidate is important, but putting forward a candidate that you KNOW is unsuitable for the role helps no one. In-depth assessments work for a reason – it ensures that placements stay in the role long-term.

12-month retention rates for placements should be in the 90 percent range. With the science-based tools available, there’s no excuse for anything less.

5.    360 Recruiter Heroes

The best recruiters manage every step of the assignment, from marketing the firm, to selling the role, to closing the deal.

Nostalgia: Everyone cheered when the first recruiter of the year broke six figures in fees. The spectacular success spurred everyone else on to new heights.

Reality: One or two elite recruiters kept the firm afloat until they realised that their earnings were propping up everybody else’s failures, and they decided to go off and start their own recruitment firm.

Modern Recruitment: A recruiter should be focused primarily on caring for their candidates and helping employers figure out their recruitment needs. Sales and marketing are still part of the job, but they’re supported by facilitators and by a time-saving systematic approach that makes the job more accessible to more people.

Recruiters come and go, but systems remain. Which is why the system is critically important for everyone involved in the process.

No alt text provided for this image

***

What do these five relics of recruitment have in common?

Don’t cheat. Skim back over them and see if you can figure it out…

It’s that they were all about what was best for the recruiter and the recruitment firm. The employers and the candidates came a distance second.

This wasn’t just because of cynicism or greed – a recruitment business, like any business, needed to be profitable to succeed and this drove the development of these practices and a culture of self-interest.

Modern, forward-thinking recruitment is different. It takes a long-term view. It considers that what is best for the candidate and the employer is ultimately best for the health of the recruitment industry as a whole.

Like it or not, recruiters are middlemen. And no one likes middlemen unless they bring valuable knowledge or skill to the table that improves the end result for everyone.

We’ve moved on to an age of recruitment where everyone in the process matters. And that’s a good thing.

We should remember the “good old days” of recruitment, not because they were better but because they’re a mark of how far we’ve come. A bit of nostalgia for how things used to be is fine, but let’s not begrudge the march of progress. It’s why recruitment has a brighter future.

***

If you want to talk more about your recruitment business development and how i-intro? can help you future-proof your recruitment business, you can CLICK HERE to make an appointment for a no-obligation chat.

If you enjoyed this article, you’ll also enjoy, 'Is Your Recruitment Firm Accidentally in Incognito Mode?'

No alt text provided for this image


Joseph M. Yukica Jr.

Vice President of Business Development / Consulting Level Recruiter at Global Technical Talent

5 年

The fundamentals are the same, recruiters have been around since the beginning of time. The tools are different.?

回复
Michael J Graham

Operational Management -Global Buying/Sourcing & Manufacturing Apparel - Retailing -Supply Chain - Strategy Planning - Teaching

5 年

If modern recruitment is so good ~thwn WHY are 70% plus of the work force seeking to change or quitting their jobs Must be something wrong ?

Brian Kent

Founder, Owner / Managing Director - PASSIONATE ACTIVIST. The Really Caring 60+ Recruitment Company.

5 年

on the other hand,...... careful dedicated investigation by over 60 years of 'experienced leadership' entrepreneurs and Co. chairpersons demonstrated overwhelmingly....... (THIS EVIDENTIAL CONCLUSION HAS TAKEN 12 YEARS TO FORMULATE) Did you know that according to ‘Recruiting Times’…?.… “Over 9,000 UK recruitment agencies set up during 2017 alone? That’s an average of 818 new agencies being registered each month… …bringing the total number of registered UK agencies to a record 35,000 plus” ! Did you realise that the UK recruitment ‘Industry collects some £40 billion p.a. According to Glassdoor.com, the average interview process in the UK takes 27.5 days! It’s becoming increasingly inconvenient and time consuming for a candidate to have to travel to a recruiter for an initial interview and then to prospective employers on several different occasions whilst trying to maintain their existing workload. Did you realise too, that this huge ‘intermediary cost’ (staff; premises; phone calls; overheads; time; bonuses; etc., etc. is met entirely by the Company/Organisation that eventually agrees to hire ! No wonder the young, uninitiated, wanabees are SO anxious to climb aboard, what looks to be a ‘gravy train’ ………. ! From social media exhortations of the daily ‘experts - It is evident that there are as many ‘right and wrong’ methods of its practice as there are ‘practitioners’ According to a recent World Bank survey - there is a shortfall of some 600 million ‘real’ jobs.......... The estimated cost to the UK Treasury of turnng a ‘blind eye’ towards widely practiced illegal ‘ageism’ is, £50 – 100 billion, (Yep! That IS another ‘B’). In the U.K. alone there are millions of folk of all ages willing and able to work. According to Government - the ‘pool’ of available advertised jobs amounts to some half a million (plus or minus 100,000 depending on the current ‘mood’) This appalling waste of human and financial resources is unsustainable and for all our sakes........... – It Has To Change………. TRCRC offers the Frustrated, Demeaned, "Overqualified" mature Candidate, an entirely New Approach, successfully tried and tested, amongst some 6,000, adult job seeking folk plus dozens of Employers, over almost 12 years….….. Despite, horrendous tales of: - The Microsoft Office developer, turned away by his local 'computer seller' due to a failure to meet their standards in relation to 'Excel'. ……………. The 'A list' husband of a Lady Peeress who had to wait for three years to find a 'Chairmanship'. ………………. The hundreds of ex 'Top Executives' who, (when/if, rarely interviewed, and usually by their 'juniors'), were refused by being "overqualified”!! …………………. The Charity that contentedly paid £20,000 to a ‘recruiter’ for finding them a middle manager. The Recruitment Director Who Justified Her Department Of Five Staff, Due To The 30 - 40 Interviews Each Year They Had To Deal With......... The list, DAILY, goes on and on ......... "Brian”, (Thanks but), you are banging your head against a brick wall". said one such frustrated, Applicant recently………… However ………… THE GENERAL SITUATION APPEARS SO BAD THAT…………… SOMEONE HAS TO !!!!! AT LEAST WE, TRCRC, HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INSTRUMENTAL IN SECURING WORTHWHILE, PAID OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOME 500 PREVIOUSLY REJECTED, DELIGHTFUL, FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS. The cultural failings of general HR led 'recruitment' have been extensively documented now for over 40 years. Yet still, inexplicably, this 'one sided' practice continues, as a job seekers essential 'rite of passage' Unless and until we can force a complete restructuring of this once proud, professional, vital Business Function, (For which wholehearted Corporate AND Governmental support would be an essential element), this appalling, £40 billion 'gravy train' is unlikely to end. Meanwhile WE - Us Candidates and Applicants, can stop providing succour to an Internationally recognised as "broken" industry, by showing far, far more courage, resilience and pride with our willingness to 'accept' the inhumane standards that are disrespectfully, often served up. BTW - Any who have doubts about these statements only has to read carefully, the many anecdotes published daily within LinkedIn. Candidates and Applicants - regain your self-respect and expect better. Experience suggests that we, Applicants, have, by our growing appearance of desperation and compliance, together with an oversubscription of qualified willing seekers, NOT ameliorated growth of a frequently reported, smug and arrogant attitude. On our part - we have to remember that there normally is no fee payable for a job finding service from which we expect, advice, communication, a 'partnership' that will lead to eventual 'job hunting success'. However - No fee does equal No 'contract' - i.e. No Rights or Responsibilities on either side - Many EMPLOYMENT experts consider this, a 'major flaw' So -Yes, to help cover our costs, we do make a modest Membership annual charge. (equivalent to a cup of coffee per week). In return for which, you will receive unparalleled support, available 24/7, from real experts who have shared your experiences; second to none guidance concerning ALL aspects of correspondence throughout the application procedure; (C.V. and Cover Letters); Face to face opportunities to meet and discuss, at a time to suit you at Garden Cottage; A Professional establishment of 'Rights and Responsibilities' on both sides; Direct contact with the World-wide Opportunities TRCRCreceives on a daily basis via its website. Guidance on how best to use social media; Introductions; the list is long........ Access to millions of World-wide Opportunities via our own TRCRC Internet Groups; Involvement, wherever suitable, within the TRCRC Campaign, directed towards Corporates and Government, and aimed at effective AGE Equality Reform. AND/PLUS - for all potential future Employers..... A GUARANTEE that you will not be constantly harassed or overcharged to cover for all the current interim (wasted), costs, inherent within the current out-dated, over-staffed 'hit and miss' 'tick-box' 'system' No ‘guarantee’ of a job of course, (that IS illegal), BUT, every Guarantee that the process will be amongst THE most Professional available, Friendly; Respectful; Informative; Dignified; Devoid of months of ignored ‘frustration’ Far, far less expensive in terms of costs, time, and wasted energy and demeaned 'self esteem'. AND YOU”LL BE DEALING WITH FOLK WHO SHARE YOUR VALUES AND EXPERIENCES………… Will ALL sympathisers to our cause, please join our TRCRC Membership AND make contact to consider becoming a TRCRC Ambassador, from which generous commissions can be made. JOIN US NOW………………………….. https://www.thereallycaring60plusrecruitmentcompany.co.uk/for-candidates/register.shtml

回复
Richard Bennigsen

?? Director, I recruit #Consumer, #FMCG & #CPG Roles ?? Podcast Host of 'The FMCG Podcast'

5 年

Great blog!

Mark Keefe

Account Manager / Recruiter

5 年

Interesting Post. I started in the IT consulting and staffing industry almost 25 years ago and I only encountered these negative behaviors at one employer. For the balance of my career (23 years), I have been fortunate enough to be with companies that have worked very hard to distance themselves from the practices you discuss.? And while our goal was always? " close deals and put people to work" ,? we constantly looked (and continue to look) for new methods and processes that will allow us to close business AND add value to our clients and consultants . ?In other words, while we wanted/needed to close business to get paid,? we also felt a strong desire to earn our margin . This meant (and continues to mean) helping our clients to understand what they need to do to put themselves in the best position to access the talent they need, and helping our consultants put themselves in the best position to land the roles they want.? ? Our roles as "middlemen /middlewomen" are roles we should be proud of. As everyone in our business knows, sourcing for top talent the right way is a full time job. It isn't something one can do effectively while attempting to run a team and deliver projects. And given the competition we all face, the successful people/companies are the one's that are constantly striving to improve the experience for all involved.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了