5 Quick Takeaways from the Fed Minutes
Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

5 Quick Takeaways from the Fed Minutes

Investors’ interest in the minutes of the April 26-27 Federal Reserve meeting that were released Wednesday increased notably after some central bank officials suggested earlier that markets may be underestimating the probability of an interest rate increase as early as this summer. The Fed did not disappoint. 

Here are five key takeaways from the minutes:

  1. Echoing the recent statement of three Fed regional presidents, the minutes indicated that members of the Federal Open Market Committee were worried that markets were underestimating the possibility of an early rate hike. Fed officials sought to correct this misconception, including by spelling out developments that could warrant an increase as early as June.
  2. This notable signal reflected Fed expectations that the all-important labor market would continue to strengthen, improving prospects for economic activity and inflation over the medium term. Officials also welcomed the recent decline in risks posed by global economic and financial conditions. And they noted that the domestic outlook was further enhanced by significant improvements in U.S. and international financial conditions.
  3. This policy posture was accompanied by qualifications, which restrained the Fed from giving a more definite message regarding June. After all, the central bank’s preferred measure of inflation is still running below the 2 percent objective, and  the international environment is far from risk-free. Another consideration is the big event risk posed by the June 23 vote on the the U.K.'s  membership in the European Union.
  4. Market action before and after the release of the minutes confirmed once again the extent to which financial asset prices remain sensitive to perceptions of the Fed’s policy stance. In anticipation of the release, traders had started to reprice the probability of a Fed hike. This was reflected in the upward move in yields on 2-year Treasuries -- the maturity most sensitive to Fed action -- the probability rise indicated by the Fed funds futures, or the flattening of the yield curve, led by the front end and to an extent not seen since December 2007. This repricing accelerated markedly Wednesday afternoon, with large yield spikes, particularly for 2-year and 5-year Treasuries.
  5. These developments yield another important conclusion: After a period of persistent dovishness and prolonged reliance on unconventional monetary policies, the Fed should now be characterized as a central bank that is inclined to gradually normalize policy absent a major domestic and international economic calamity. The likelihood of at least one rate increase in 2016 is almost a done deal, most probably this summer. The probability of this being followed a second hike, while less certain, should not be dismissed too readily.

This post originally appeared on Bloomberg View.

Non Farm confirm that june rate hike is out of the picture

Theodora Caroline Krieble

Operations San Francisco

8 年

Based on Japan the United States should take note on an external benchmark for Central bank intervention and investment. Japan during ramp up of their debt had no military. According to the OECD all public spending peaked at around 23.1 percent of GDP. The average for OECD is 21.4 percent to GDP. Clearly every dollar Japan invested looks like an outflow over longer term. Perhaps China? Contrarian Logic? Perhaps? My thesis is government success or failure is based on inflow/outflow observed over longer term. Another dimension is Brexit. It 'is supposed to be serious risk to growth' says G7. I believe the Brexit understands these FDI flows to sustainability. A problem emerges with geometric or perhaps steep increases in GDP debt over longer term. My own findings it’s not social welfare spending per se, but de-scaling in core national purpose jobs, such as basic manufacturing needs locally. In addition, Low paid wages adds no national long term purpose. It does add to scale social welfare and remains impossible for those in the tar pit to have lift off once market forces win without easy access to law enforcement to get out. Britain is a beautiful government, people and strong history of leadership. It is their real estate, they will survive stronger. The United States is at a similar pivot point on interest rates. Our jobs continue to erode and even corporate debt since the 1990s lost almost all their AAA ratings. We too have to get back to the fundamentals that made our own federal sovereignty strong. What happened to our strong AAA hundreds of companies in the 1990s down to a finger count? It was Debt. This was the wrong kind of debt. The kind pensions cannot invest in under risk. It is the risk millennials cannot invest in as well. Well, In the 1980s and 1990s I created cool products at both Kyocera and Carborundum Company (BP at that time) in advanced materials. Everything I did is in market today. Everything was a great investment under FV. It is time the United States raises interest rates to pay dividends...now. It is now.

回复

From my point of view, there are 3 US economic indicators key to determining how dovish or hawkish the market is going to be: new home sales, Non-farm payrolls and inflation. For the start of next week, US dollar sellers and commodity buyers are likely to take over the markets, and only can be dissuaded if new home sales data is stronger than expected. In brief, only higher growth rates in US economic indicators could boost rate hike odds as soon as june.

Lisa Ann Wade

Sales Consultant

8 年

Unpredictable as to the outcome....

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mohamed El-Erian的更多文章

社区洞察