5-Level Framework from AI to AGI

OpenAI has recently introduced a five-level classification system to track progress towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). This framework is becoming a focal point of discussion in the tech industry, offering a roadmap for understanding the evolution of AI capabilities.? I believe this system provides crucial insights for business leaders and technology professionals navigating the rapidly changing AI landscape.

Here I have explored each level of OpenAI's classification system, examining current progress and providing examples of technologies that showcase aspects of each level. I am hoping this will help you to anticipate and prepare for the transformative impact of AI on your industry and organization.?

Level 1: Conversational AI

?Level 1 represents the current state of AI technology, focusing on systems that can engage in human-like conversations. These AI models can understand and generate natural language, respond to queries, and perform basic tasks based on textual input.

Examples:

• ChatGPT (OpenAI): A language model capable of engaging in human-like conversations, answering questions, and assisting with various text-based tasks.
• Gemini (Google): A conversational AI system designed for open-ended dialogues and complex problem-solving.
• Claude (Anthropic): An AI assistant proficient in natural language conversations and various text-based tasks.

?These conversational AI systems have found applications in customer service, virtual assistants, and content generation. While they demonstrate impressive language understanding and generation capabilities, they are limited to text-based interactions and lack true reasoning or problem-solving abilities beyond their training data. As we move forward, we can expect to see these systems become more refined and integrated into various business processes, enhancing efficiency and user experiences across industries.

?Level 2: Reasoners

Level 2 AI systems, termed "Reasoners," represent a significant leap forward in AI capabilities. These systems are expected to solve complex problems at a level comparable to humans with doctorate-level education, without relying on external resources.

Examples approaching Level 2:

• AlphaFold (DeepMind): An AI system that can predict protein structures with high accuracy, demonstrating problem-solving skills in complex scientific domains.
• GPT-4 (OpenAI): While primarily a language model, GPT-4 has shown improved reasoning capabilities in tasks such as analyzing complex scenarios and providing logical explanations.

?These examples illustrate progress towards Level 2, but true "Reasoners" that can consistently solve complex problems across various domains without external resources are still in development. As we approach this level, we can anticipate AI systems playing increasingly significant roles in research, data analysis, and decision-making processes across industries.

Level 3: Agents

Level 3 introduces "Agents," AI systems capable of acting autonomously on behalf of users for extended periods. These agents would be able to perform tasks, make decisions, and adapt to changing circumstances over several days without constant human oversight.

Examples showcasing aspects of Level 3:

• CrewAI: A framework for orchestrating role-playing AI agents, allowing multiple AI entities to work together on complex tasks, each with a specific role and expertise.
• AutoGen (Microsoft): A framework enabling the development of LLM-based conversable AI agents that can collaborate to solve tasks.
• Constitutional AI (Anthropic): AI systems with enhanced safety features and the ability to follow complex instructions over extended interactions.
• OpenAI's hide-and-seek agents: AI agents that developed complex strategies through reinforcement learning, showcasing emergent behaviours over extended periods.

These examples show progress towards autonomous agency, but they are still limited to specific domains and lack the general-purpose capabilities envisioned for Level 3 agents. As we move closer to this level, we can expect to see AI systems taking on more complex, multi-step tasks with minimal human intervention, potentially revolutionizing project management, customer service, and operational workflows.

Level 4: Innovators

Level 4 systems, described as "Innovators," would be capable of developing original ideas and solutions, potentially driving breakthroughs in various fields. These systems would not only solve existing problems but also identify new challenges and create innovative approaches to address them.

Examples showcasing aspects of innovation:

• DALL-E 2 (OpenAI): An image generation model that can create unique and creative images based on text descriptions, showcasing a form of visual innovation.
• AlphaGo Zero (DeepMind): An AI that developed novel strategies in the game of Go, surpassing human knowledge and demonstrating innovative gameplay.
• AI-Powered Drug Discovery: Systems like Atomwise use AI to innovate in pharmaceutical research, predicting new drug candidates and accelerating the discovery process.

These examples demonstrate AI's potential for innovation in specific domains, but they fall short of the general-purpose innovative capabilities envisioned for Level 4 systems. As we progress towards this level, we can anticipate AI playing a more significant role in research and development across industries, potentially leading to breakthroughs in science, technology, and business strategy.

?Level 5: Organizations

The pinnacle of OpenAI's classification system, Level 5 "Organizations," represents AI systems capable of performing the work of entire organizations. These systems would manage complex workflows, make strategic decisions, and optimize operations across various departments and functions.

While I think no existing AI systems come close to Level 5 capabilities, some technologies demonstrate early steps towards organizational-level AI:

• Hypothetical AI Corporate Management: In the future, we might see AI systems that can analyze market trends and competitor actions to formulate business strategies, manage human and AI workforce allocation and performance, and make high-level decisions on mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructuring.
• AI-Driven Healthcare Systems: While ethical considerations are paramount, future AI could potentially manage hospital operations, from patient scheduling to resource allocation, coordinate research efforts across multiple institutions, and analyze global health data to predict and respond to pandemics.
• Autonomous Trading Systems: While limited to financial markets, some hedge funds and trading firms use AI systems that operate with significant autonomy, making real-time trading decisions based on market data and complex algorithms, managing risk and portfolio allocation autonomously, and adapting strategies based on changing market conditions.

These examples illustrate the potential for AI to impact organizational processes, but they are a far cry from the fully autonomous, AGI-level systems envisioned for Level 5. The realization of this level would represent a paradigm shift in how we think about organizational structure and management. ?

In conclusion, OpenAI's five-level classification system provides a valuable roadmap for tracking progress towards AGI. As we navigate through these levels, from our current position at Level 1 with glimpses of Level 2, to the theoretical realms of Levels 4 and 5, it's crucial for business leaders and technology professionals to stay informed and adaptable. This framework not only helps us understand the current state of AI but also allows us to anticipate and prepare for the transformative impact these advancements will have on our industries, organizations, and society as a whole.

?

Disclaimer: This article was developed using a combination of my original research, analysis, and viewpoints, supplemented by AI-assisted tools. I utilised AI platforms such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Perplexity AI to aid in information gathering and linguistic refinement. While these tools enhanced the article's clarity and articulation, the core insights and opinions expressed are my own, based on extensive research and industry experience.