The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team Framework


Lencioni presents the dysfunctions in the form of a pyramid, with each layer representing a critical component of team functionality. Below is a detailed breakdown of the framework:

1. Absence of Trust (Base of the Pyramid)

  • Definition: Lack of vulnerability among team members, leading to fear of being open about weaknesses or mistakes.
  • Symptoms: Team members avoid asking for help, hesitate to admit failures, and conceal their weaknesses.
  • Kathryn’s Approach: Kathryn pushes her team to engage in personal storytelling exercises and vulnerability-based trust-building activities.
  • Key Lesson: Trust is foundational for team collaboration.


2. Fear of Conflict

  • Definition: Teams avoid healthy debate, fearing personal discomfort or interpersonal tension.
  • Symptoms: Superficial discussions, unresolved issues, and an environment of artificial harmony.
  • Kathryn’s Approach: Kathryn encourages her team to engage in constructive debates by demonstrating that conflict, when managed well, is productive.
  • Key Lesson: Open and honest dialogue fosters innovation and clarity.


3. Lack of Commitment

  • Definition: Ambiguity about goals and priorities due to inadequate buy-in from team members.
  • Symptoms: Indecisiveness, lack of alignment, and delayed action.
  • Kathryn’s Approach: She implements clear decision-making processes and emphasizes shared commitment to the team’s vision.
  • Key Lesson: Alignment and commitment are essential for team effectiveness.


4. Avoidance of Accountability

  • Definition: Hesitation to hold peers accountable for their performance or behavior.
  • Symptoms: Mediocre results, missed deadlines, and lack of peer-to-peer critique.
  • Kathryn’s Approach: Kathryn reinforces a culture where accountability is a shared responsibility, not just the leader's job.
  • Key Lesson: Peer accountability drives high standards and performance.


5. Inattention to Results (Apex of the Pyramid)

  • Definition: Prioritizing personal status or departmental goals over collective success.
  • Symptoms: Fragmented efforts, lack of focus on overarching objectives.
  • Kathryn’s Approach: She aligns individual incentives with team success and ensures the team’s goals remain the top priority.
  • Key Lesson: Teams must prioritize collective results over personal ambitions.


Examples and Cases from the Book

  1. Personal Vulnerability Exercise:
  2. Encouraging Conflict:
  3. Clear Goals and Commitments:
  4. Accountability Practices:
  5. Results Orientation:


Key Takeaways

  • Cohesion Over Competence: A cohesive team often outperforms a team of highly skilled individuals who lack collaboration.
  • Vulnerability as Strength: Leaders and team members should model vulnerability to build trust.
  • Conflict is Productive: Healthy conflict is necessary for innovation and decision-making.
  • Commitment Requires Clarity: Decisions must be clear, even if not unanimous, to ensure commitment.
  • Accountability is Collective: A culture of accountability fosters excellence.
  • Focus on Results: Teams thrive when collective success is prioritized over individual interests.


Practical Applications

Lencioni’s framework is widely applicable across industries and organizational levels. It serves as a diagnostic tool and provides actionable strategies to address team dysfunctions. For leadership teams, the book offers a roadmap to building trust, fostering collaboration, and driving results.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了