#45: AI Through the Looking Glass: From Meta’s RayBans to AI Pollution and Beyond...

??? ?????????????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????? ????????’?? ????-?????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ??

Brian X. Chen and Mike Isaac of The New York Times recently took Meta’s new Ray-Ban smart glasses for a test drive, revealing a mix of wonder, hilarity, and tech hiccups.

These glasses, priced starting at $300, are about to get a major update next month, integrating AI to see and describe the world around you—everything from identifying dog breeds to translating languages.

Their adventures included visits to zoos, museums, and grocery shopping, with the AI attempting to identify everything from animals to artwork.

Despite some mistakes (like confusing a monkey for a giraffe), the glasses showed promise in tasks such as determining if products were gluten-free and recognizing famous landmarks.

Meta aims to refine this technology over time, promising improvements and new capabilities. Chen and Isaac’s experiences underscore the potential and current limitations of wearable AI tech, offering a peek into an intriguing, tech-enhanced future.

A couple of questions for Paul Daugherty, CTO, Accenture

Thanks Michael Krigsman for the opportunity to pose a few questions to Paul Daugherty (Accenture) in this episode of #CXOTalk.

My first question (at the 24:52 mark in the video) dwelled upon the the distinction between good AI and bad AI, emphasizing the importance of human control in ensuring AI develops positively and soliciting Paul's views on the same.

"good AI will do good things, bad AI will do bad things, how do you ensure that humans stay in control of making the good versus bad distinctions in the creation of AI?"

Paul, who has written a book on this subject, highlighted human accountability as a central principle in AI development.

He opined against blaming AI for issues, asserting that humans are ultimately responsible for the design, implementation, and oversight of AI systems.

He advocated for a shift from the notion of

"human in the loop" to "human orchestration of AI systems,"

emphasizing human control and augmentation of human capabilities rather than mere oversight.

He also shared insights from Accenture's experience with 800 generative AI projects, including generating $1 billion in sales from generative AI in six months, stressing the importance of moving beyond narrow use cases to a broader, value-chain perspective. This approach aims to maximize the potential and value of AI by fundamentally reimagining and reengineering processes.

My second question (at 48:49 in the video) raised a concern about

organizations struggling to leverage AI effectively, caught between seeing its potential and actualizing business value, often distracted by "shiny objects" instead of focusing on essentials.

Paul responded by describing how Accenture and others are addressing this challenge through five strategies:-

• Lead with Value: Initiating with a strong business case, distinguishing between strategic investments and necessary foundational steps, such as optimizing HR job descriptions or enhancing knowledge management, alongside industry-specific strategic initiatives like underwriting in insurance or R&D in life sciences.
• Develop the Digital Core: Recognizing that most companies are technologically behind, it's crucial to build the necessary digital infrastructure to support AI technologies.
• Address Talent Gaps: Enhancing training, transparency, and learning within organizations to cultivate the required skills for AI adoption.
• Implement Responsible AI: Establishing a framework for responsible AI usage before progressing too far, ensuring ethical considerations are integral to AI initiatives.
• Champion Change Management: Preparing for a decade of continuous change, emphasizing the importance of developing change management capabilities to adapt to rapid technological advancements and evolving ethical standards.

Additionally, the conversation touched on the importance of personal knowledge and transparency among leaders, the impact of large language models on robotics advancement, especially in humanoid robotics, and the critical role of diverse teams in mitigating cultural bias in AI, underscoring that innovation thrives on inclusion.

In conclusion, overcoming the AI implementation "logjam" requires a focused approach that values strategic business outcomes, builds the necessary technological foundation, cultivates talent, ensures ethical AI use, and manages ongoing change effectively, all while fostering diversity and inclusion to drive innovation.

AI and the Erosion of Authenticity: A Neuroscientist's Warning

In a compelling guest essay for The New York Times, Erik Hoel, a neuroscientist and novelist, raises alarms about the pervasive impact of AI-generated content on our culture.

He argues that the influx of synthetic outputs from AI, particularly following the release of advanced models like GPT-4, is leading to a dilution of quality across various domains, including scientific research. Hoel points to a study showing an increase in certain adjectives in peer reviews at AI conferences, suggesting that researchers are increasingly relying on AI for tasks like peer reviewing, which risks the integrity of scientific discourse.

The essay further explores the broader cultural ramifications of unchecked AI use. From AI-generated replies on social media platforms to synthetic videos for children on YouTube, Hoel argues that the proliferation of AI-generated content is contributing to a degradation of quality and authenticity in our cultural outputs.

He likens the situation to environmental pollution, advocating for a "Clean Internet Act" that would require advanced watermarking to identify AI-generated content, thereby protecting our shared human culture from becoming inundated with what he terms "synthetic garbage."

Hoel's critique is not just a cautionary tale about the potential downsides of AI but also a call to action for more responsible use and regulation of AI technologies to preserve the integrity of our cultural and scientific institutions.

A counter-narrative to Erik Hoel's concerns about AI-generated content polluting culture could focus on the potential benefits and transformative impacts of AI on creativity, innovation, and accessibility in culture and science. Here are some key points that such a narrative might explore:

1. Democratization of Creation and Accessibility

AI tools lower barriers to content creation, enabling a wider range of voices to participate in cultural and scientific conversations. This democratization can lead to a richer, more diverse cultural landscape. AI-generated content can make complex scientific concepts accessible to a broader audience, fostering a more informed public.

2. Enhancing Human Creativity

Rather than diluting culture, AI can be seen as a tool that augments human creativity. By handling mundane or repetitive tasks, AI allows human creators to focus on innovative and creative aspects of their work. This partnership between humans and AI can lead to new genres of art and literature and breakthroughs in scientific research.

3. Educational Tools and Personalized Learning

AI-generated content can serve as an invaluable educational resource, offering personalized learning experiences that adapt to individual students' needs. This can enhance understanding and retention, particularly in complex fields like science and mathematics.

4. Efficiency and Progress in Scientific Research

In the realm of science, AI can significantly speed up the research process, from literature reviews to data analysis. This efficiency can accelerate discoveries and technological advancements, potentially leading to solutions for pressing global challenges.

5. Quality Control and Improvement Over Time

While concerns about the quality of AI-generated content are valid, it's important to recognize that AI models are continuously improving. Advances in AI technology, including better detection of inaccurate or misleading information, mean that the quality of AI-generated content is likely to improve over time.

6. Potential for New Forms of Cultural Expression

AI opens up possibilities for entirely new forms of cultural expression that were previously unimaginable. From AI-assisted music and art to interactive and adaptive media, these innovations can enrich the cultural landscape and offer new ways for people to engage with art, literature, and each other.

While it's crucial to be mindful of the challenges and potential downsides of AI-generated content, it's equally important to consider the positive transformations AI can bring to culture and science. A balanced approach that harnesses the benefits of AI while implementing safeguards against its risks can lead to a future where AI enhances human creativity and knowledge, rather than detracting from it.

Signing Off

Why don't AI programs ever have financial troubles?

Because they're always in the loop about the best bytecoin investments!

Keep an eye on our upcoming editions for in-depth discussions on specific AI trends, expert insights, and answers to your most pressing AI questions!

Stay connected for more updates and insights in the dynamic world of AI.

For any feedback or topics you'd like us to cover, feel free to contact me via LinkedIn or email me at deepak.seth.itleader@gmail.com

DEEPakAI: AI Demystifed Demystifying AI, one newsletter at a time!

p.s. - The newsletter includes smart prompt based LLM generated content.