4 Themes Shaping Our Outlook for 2022

After back?to?back years of strong performance across most equity and credit sectors, Justin Thomson, CIO and head of International Equity, Mark Vaselkiv, Fixed Income CIO, and I agree that global markets face uncertain prospects in 2022. Investors will need to use greater selectivity to identify potential opportunities. Higher inflation, a shift in monetary policy, and new coronavirus variants all pose potential challenges for economic growth and earnings—at a time when valuations appear elevated across many asset categories.

On the positive side, household wealth gains, pent?up consumer demand, and a potential boom in capital expenditures could sustain growth even as monetary policy turns less supportive. Over the next year, in my view, the bottom line is that we will face slowing growth, but still very high growth.

But strong growth and rising wages also could put further upward pressure on U.S. commodity and consumer prices, which accelerated sharply in the second half of 2021. Mark worries that the U.S. Federal Reserve may have fallen behind in the fight against inflation. As of mid?November 2021, interest rate futures markets indicated that the Fed wasn’t expected to begin raising rates until mid?2022.

Mark warns that the Fed may already be behind the curve and that this could be the biggest risk for 2022. Economic growth should continue to support corporate earnings and credit quality in 2022. But the earnings momentum seen in 2021 is unlikely to be repeated, Justin suggests. He points out that it seems highly unlikely that positive earnings revisions will be of the same level of magnitude as we’ve been seeing.

This could make the interest rate outlook an even more critical factor for equity performance. Justin thinks that if U.S. rate expectations get brought forward, equity markets will take their cue from that.

Growth Delayed, Not Derailed

Despite headwinds from the pandemic, the global economic recovery still appeared on track as 2021 neared its end. But inflation risks have risen. In 2022, investors will need to watch what fiscal and monetary policymakers do to try to stem price pressures while sustaining growth.

Although a coronavirus resurgence in Europe and the emergence of the highly mutated omicron variant are reminders that the pandemic is still with us, the net economic effect of past waves—such as the spread of the delta variant—has been to postpone activity, not prevent it. This pattern could give a modest boost to growth in the first half of 2022, I believe.

The bearish economic case now centers on monetary and fiscal policy. As governments and central banks withdraw the massive stimulus applied during the pandemic, economic growth inevitably will slow sharply—or so the argument goes. But slower growth doesn’t necessarily mean low growth. I see a number of tailwinds that I think could sustain the recovery in 2022:

• Consumers are in a strong cash position, especially in the United States, where over USD 2 trillion is sitting in checking accounts and other short?term deposits.
• Asset appreciation has boosted household wealth both in the U.S. and globally.
• Pent?up demand for housing should continue to fuel new home construction.
• Corporate balance sheets hold a lot of cash, with high liquidity and low debt ratios.
• Transportation bottlenecks appeared to ease in late 2021, as seen by a sharp drop in global seaborne shipping costs.

Mark thinks the question is whether global consumers will convert their improved financial positions into higher spending. Assuming pandemic disruptions remain relatively manageable, he sees the potential for a surge in pent?up demand in 2022 for travel, entertainment, and other “quality of life” services, as well as for new cars as auto production normalizes.

With interest rates still low and banks eager to put deposits to work, loan growth also could drive consumer demand, Mark adds. But the same factors—free cash, wealth, pent?up demand—potentially supporting growth also could prolong the sharp upswing in inflation seen in the second half of 2021.

Unless pandemic conditions deteriorate significantly, improving global supply chains and factory reopenings could ease the upward pressure on prices in 2022, in my view. Much of the 2021 inflation surge was concentrated in specific products—such as used cars and gasoline—that were particularly hard hit by supply/demand imbalances. The hefty price hikes in these goods seen in 2021 are unlikely to be repeated in 2022.

The bad news: Prices for many other key items—such as some foodstuffs, rent, apparel, and airfares—have lagged broader inflation. As higher energy costs and the appreciation in home prices ripple through the economy, price increases for these goods are likely to play catch?up, Mark warns. Rents, in particular, appear poised to accelerate in 2022.

Mark feels rising wages could present a longer?term structural inflation risk. While faster income growth should help support consumer spending, it could contribute to a wage?price spiral as businesses pass along higher costs—in turn putting more upward pressure on wages. If inflation starts to permeate into wages, Justin adds, and that starts to drive inflation expectations, then maybe inflation will not be as transitory as we thought.

Demographic and labor market trends could heighten that risk. Mark notes that occupations in a number of key sectors—including transportation, health care, and education—are seeing a wave of retirements, or soon will, as the baby boomer generation passes out of the workforce.

Meanwhile, large companies with deep pockets, such as Amazon, can afford to raise wages aggressively to attract the workers they need. Other service industries and smaller companies could be hard pressed to compete. Mark notes that profit margins have been very high for very long, but now the pendulum is swinging from capital to labor.

Focus on Fundamentals

Global equity markets demonstrated resilience in 2021, although the rise of the omicron variant put a damper on optimism as the year drew to a close. Looking ahead to 2022, the question is whether earnings growth will continue to support U.S. equity valuations that appear stretched in absolute terms. Although signs of speculative excess abounded in 2021 in areas like cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens, the U.S. stock market did not appear to be in bubble territory, in my opinion.

But equity valuations were a bit of a puzzle. As of mid?November 2021, the price/earnings (P/E) ratio on the Russell 3000 Index was almost at the top of its historical range since 1989. Relative to real (after?inflation) bond yields, however, the index’s earnings yield was in the least expensive percentile for that same period. So, I can say that U.S. stocks looked almost as expensive as they’ve ever been, but also almost as cheap as they’ve ever been, and both statements are technically correct if you look through the right lens.

Much will depend on the strength of earnings growth in an environment where the spread of coronavirus variants and the potential for rising interest rates both pose significant—if contrary—risks to the global economic recovery. Throughout most of 2021, U.S. equity gains were supported by a steady stream of upward earnings revisions, Justin notes. Despite a nearly 23% rise in the S&P 500 Index in the first 10 months of the year, the index P/E ratio actually fell over that same period as earnings rose faster than stock prices.1?

Justin predicts that if the recovery remains on track, earnings growth should continue in 2022. But with S&P 500 operating margins at a record level, U.S. earnings momentum is likely to slow. The starting point for profitability is very high, Justin observes, and it’s going to be a hard hurdle to beat.

Beyond 2022, the hurdles look even tougher to clear, Justin warns. The next two to three years could be very difficult from an earnings growth perspective. At a minimum, we could well see below?normal growth. But the stock market simply has not factored that in.

Slowing earnings momentum also is likely to produce more uneven results across companies, Justin thinks, requiring investors to be more selective but potentially creating opportunities for active portfolio managers to add value for their clients.?Likewise, rising costs could put a premium on stock selection skill. Companies that can pass through inflation should continue to see earnings growth. But for companies that don’t have pricing power, it could be an issue.

Justin points out that the earnings picture for ex?U.S. equities is more mixed. While earnings growth has been surprisingly strong in Europe, momentum in Japan has been slowed by a sluggish domestic economy. Looking to 2022, however, Justin suggests that Japan could offer potential relative valuation opportunities if the global recovery remains on track, as could equities, credit, and currencies in select emerging markets (EM). A contrarian case can be made for Chinese equities, he adds, as Beijing moves to restimulate an economy that appears close to stall speed.

I believe that valuation fundamentals and cyclical factors could favor the “recovery trade” in 2022. Financial stocks, which carry a heavy weight in the value universe, historically have tended to outperform in a rising interest rate environment. And small?cap stocks typically have done well during economic recoveries.

In a period of rising rates and higher inflation, the growth style could underperform, Justin concedes. This could have implications for key growth sectors—technology in particular—that have led equity markets for much of the past decade. Companies that can grow earnings persistently over a long period of time are extremely rare, so Justin thinks the odds that technology will continue to be a dominant sector are rather low.

Navigating Policy Shifts

With inflation emerging as both a leading investment risk and a hot political issue, a turn toward higher interest rates appeared to be underway as 2021 ended. Yet, with COVID?19 still clouding the outlook, global central banks were moving at different speeds.

As usual, the Fed holds center stage. As of late 2021, market expectations were rising that the Fed would begin tapering its quantitative easing bond purchases at a faster pace early in 2022. But there may be a disconnect between investor perceptions of Fed policy and the inflation expectations priced into fixed income yields.

According to Mark, many investors came to the conclusion in the second half of 2021 that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell was being “irrationally dovish” in continuing to focus on U.S. unemployment even as inflation accelerated. But Justin argues that market indicators as of mid?November 2021 were reflecting a less bearish view. “Whether it’s long?dated rates or Treasury inflation protected securities, markets are sending signals that inflation is a transitory effect.”

I think a key question could be whether market expectations are compatible with the Fed’s 2% long?term inflation target. While that target is flexible, five?year break?even rates (the spreads between yields on TIPS and on regular Treasuries with equivalent maturities) as of mid?November 2021 suggested that the market was anticipating 3% U.S. consumer inflation. The Fed’s credibility could be on the line. There’s being flexible around 2%, and then there’s letting inflation average 3% over the next five years. Something will have to give.

Mark says he sees two potential interest rate scenarios for 2022:

• The Fed remains too dovish for too long, causing the yield curve (the spread between short? and long?term Treasury yields) to steepen. That could push the benchmark 10?year U.S. Treasury yield above 2%.
• The Fed is forced to raise rates faster—and possibly higher—than markets expect. In that scenario, the yield curve could flatten and the 10?year Treasury yield could fall as investors begin to anticipate a negative shock to growth.

While continued strong economic growth and inflation potentially could pose significant risks for U.S. Treasuries and other low?yielding sovereign sectors in 2022, Mark believes they’ve produced something close to “nirvana” for global credit investors. Recent indicators of corporate credit quality appear to reflect that blissful state, Mark notes, with the default rate on floating rate bank loans below 1% as of mid?November 2021 and the upgrade/downgrade ratio among U.S. high yield issuers approaching 1.8?to?1.

In Mark’s view, floating rate bank loans could offer particularly attractive potential opportunities in a rising interest rate environment because their rates typically reset every 90 days, giving them the shortest duration of any credit sector.2

But history suggests that ideal credit conditions don’t last forever, Mark cautions. The dynamics supporting credit quality—ample liquidity, solid earnings growth, low balance sheet leverage—also could facilitate a shift to riskier financial practices. Mark sees a flashing yellow light that over the next year or so credit quality could begin to deteriorate as companies use low?cost debt to pursue merger and acquisition deals and banks offer easier financing for private?equity transactions.

With credit spreads (the yield differences between bonds that carry default risk and comparable U.S. Treasury securities) historically tight across nearly every U.S. credit sector, investors may need to cast a wider net in 2022. EM corporate debt is the one global credit sector that still appears extremely cheap, especially in Asian markets, Mark contends. However, a positive outcome for Asian credit in 2022 will require a successful stabilization of China’s economy.

Path to Global Sustainability

Vulnerable supply chains, crumbling infrastructure, higher energy prices, and a longer?term need to reduce carbon emissions all have helped push economic sustainability to the forefront of the global policy agenda. This could boost public and private fixed investment in 2022, supporting economic growth. Justin thinks that we may be in for a paradigm shift here, and you can certainly make the case for a sustained period of high capex (capital expenditures).

Global corporations appear to have ample resources to finance fixed investment, thanks to strong earnings. The cash holdings of the companies in the S&P 500, for example, totaled nearly USD 2 trillion at the end of September 2021. Corporate spending on fixed investment has been relatively restrained for the past several decades, Justin notes, in part because new technologies enabled companies to boost productivity and profitability without heavy capital outlays.

But that may be changing. The economic recovery spurred a sharp cyclical acceleration in capex in 2021. The push for sustainability, Justin suggests, could generate a more extended wave of investment in physical infrastructure—ports, highways, power grids, etc.—and in capital goods manufacturing.

Justin identifies several trends he thinks have the potential to drive capex, including:

• Meeting the international target of “net zero” carbon emissions by 2050 will require heavy investments in utilities, the automotive sector, and green technologies.
• Ports and maritime fleets need to be expanded to bolster global supply chains; onshoring those supply chains could boost demand for warehouses, rail and truck delivery, and domestic factories.
• Upward pressure on wages could produce a substitution effect as companies try to replace labor with capital, spurring investment in factory robots and other automation equipment.
• Companies may decide to rebuild depleted inventories, which in turn could spur investment in new productive capacity.
• Fiscal policymakers appear more relaxed about spending, debt, and inflation. This could clear the way for public infrastructure spending—like the USD 1 trillion package passed by the U.S. Congress in late 2021.

For investors, these trends could generate potential opportunities in both equity and credit markets in 2022. A capex boom could be expected to boost sales and earnings for capital goods manufacturers, Justin notes, to the potential advantage of stock markets in Germany and Japan, which host some of the world’s leading industrial companies. European banks, which have carved out a major role in financing investments in solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources, also could be indirect beneficiaries.

Financing “transformational” industries has long been a core competency for high yield debt markets, Mark argues—as evidenced by the role that high yield financing played in getting the electric vehicle industry off the ground. Mark points out that this could be an exciting decade as we move from traditional carbon fuels to cleaner sources of energy. However, demand during that period also could be high for “transitional” fuels, particularly natural gas, he suggests. This likely would require substantial investment in gas production and distribution. In his view, global high yield markets are well positioned to provide that capital.

The runup in energy prices seen in 2021 also could help reduce carbon emissions, by restraining demand for oil and making renewable sources more competitive. To a considerable extent, higher energy prices are the product of a steady decline in oil and gas investment—partly driven by pressure from activist shareholders but also reflecting the industry’s poor profitability. Mark notes that some of these companies haven’t generated free cash flow for years. In terms of some of the major oil players, their stocks are significantly below where they were five years ago—in the middle of one of the great bull markets in history.

Summary

For the better part of the past two years, the global market outlook has been dominated by COVID?19. While the omicron variant—and the possibility of renewed lockdowns—are still threats, the primary economic focus for 2022 has shifted to the risks that higher inflation and interest rates could pose for growth and asset returns.

Those concerns have put the spotlight squarely on the world’s central banks, particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve. So far, the Fed’s go?slow approach to tightening has avoided a repetition of the 2013 “taper tantrum.” But it looks increasingly out of step with the inflation fundamentals, Mark argues. He thinks the probabilities of major policy mistakes are very high.

Policy uncertainty is highlighted by a stark contrast between an accelerating U.S. consumer price index and nominal bond yields that as of mid?November 2021 appeared to reflect much more benign expectations. How—and when—that contradiction is resolved will determine the performance of sovereign and investment?grade credit sectors in 2022.

From my perspective, it’s hard to disagree that bond valuations look stretched when real rates are near all?time lows. The bond market appears to have priced in an extremely dovish Fed and a sharp deceleration in growth.

We all agree that, barring a return to widespread pandemic lockdowns, the coming year could offer relatively favorable prospects for global equity and credit investors if pent?up consumer demand, stabilization in China, and a potential upswing in fixed investment can—as we expect—sustain economic growth.

But, even if growth remains strong, it would be a mistake to assume the impressive U.S. earnings momentum seen in 2021 will extend into 2022, Justin warns. There appears to be little room for margin expansion—especially if wage costs continue to rise quickly. While some industries, such as aerospace, airlines, hotels, and cruise lines, have lagged in the earnings recovery so far—potentially leaving room for positive momentum—they account for relatively small shares of S&P 500 capitalization.

Justin suggests that continued cyclical expansion, but with slower U.S. earnings growth, could bring to an end an exceptionally long period of U.S. equity outperformance over ex?U.S. equities.

Negative real U.S. interest rates have lent critical support to historically stretched equity valuations. But in periods of rising rates, Justin warns, high valuations can become an albatross. Accordingly, he argues, relative valuation considerations could favor less expensive, more cyclically exposed markets in 2022—such as Japan and the emerging markets, including China—that appear positioned to benefit from stronger global capital spending.

In an uncertain policy environment, asset allocation could be especially crucial for managing investment risk going forward. But that may require a more dynamic diversification approach than the traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio—and a broader mix of fixed income sectors than the typical “core” investment?grade bond allocation.

With real rates this low, we have to acknowledge that bonds may not diversify stocks as well as they have in the past. My own view is that the 60/40 portfolio needs to be reoptimized for the current environment.

References

1 Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

2 Duration measures a bond’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. ?

---------

Important Information

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action.

The views contained herein are those of the author as of December 2021 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.

This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types; advice of any kind or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Please consider your own circumstances before making an investment decision.

Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from estimates, or any forward-looking statement provided.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. These risks are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

? 2021 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

?

Additional Disclosures

Copyright ? 2021, S&P Global Market Intelligence (and its affiliates, as applicable). Reproduction of any information, data or material, including ratings (“Content”) in any form is prohibited except with the prior written permission of the relevant party. Such party, its affiliates and suppliers (“Content Providers”) do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, timeliness or availability of any Content and are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such Content. In no event shall Content Providers be liable for any damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including lost income or lost profit and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content. A reference to a particular investment or security, a rating or any observation concerning an investment that is part of the Content is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such investment or security, does not address the suitability of an investment or security and should not be relied on as investment advice. Credit ratings are statements of opinions and are not statements of fact.

Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The index is used with permission. The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright ? 2021, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

?