4 Themes Shaping the 2023 Global Investment Landscape
For our 2023 Global Market Outlook, titled “The Need for Agility,” Sébastien Page, CIO and head of Global Multi?Asset; Justin Thomson, CIO and head of International Equity; and Andy McCormick, CIO and head of Global Fixed Income, offer their insights on the major themes that will shape the investment landscape.
Read on for a summary of their informative discussion.
A Time to Be Selectively Contrarian
Heading into 2023, capital markets appear to have priced in a significant global economic slowdown. The key question is whether this deceleration will end in a “soft landing”—with slower but still positive growth—or in a full?fledged recession that drags down earnings.
Much depends on the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) and the world’s other major central banks as they continue efforts to bring inflation under control by hiking interest rates and draining liquidity from the markets. “History is not on our side,” says Sébastien. “Fed hiking cycles don’t generally end well, especially when inflation is running high.” But investors shouldn’t assume a deep downturn is inevitable, he adds.
Although some leading indicators have weakened (Figure 1), U.S. employment was still growing in late 2022. Corporate and household balance sheets appeared strong. And the economic wounds inflicted by the coronavirus pandemic continued to heal, notes Justin, head of International Equity and CIO.
Geopolitical risks will remain potential triggers for downside volatility in 2023. Structural factors, such as bank capital requirements that constrain market liquidity, could magnify price movements, both up and down.
With most central banks seeking tighter financial conditions, investors can’t count on them to intervene if markets fall, warns Andy, head of Global Fixed Income and CIO. “We’ve come out of a period where central banks had strong motivation to suppress volatility,” Andy says. “Now, policy is aimed at tightening financial conditions. So there is no buyer of last resort when markets come unhinged.”
But excessive pessimism and volatility can create value for agile investors, the CIOs note. An attractive point to raise exposure to equities and other risk assets may appear in 2023, Sébastien predicts. However, as of late 2022, it had not yet arrived, in his view.
Until it does, Sébastien favors a “selectively contrarian” approach of tilting toward specific sectors within asset classes—such as small?cap stocks relative to large?caps and high yield relative to investment?grade bonds.
In difficult markets, security selection will be critical, Sébastien says. “Active management skill is just incredibly important in this environment.”
THEME ONE: An Economic Balancing Act
The outlook for inflation and interest rates (Figure 2) will remain critical in 2023 as investors try to estimate where rates will peak and when the Fed might “pivot” toward monetary easing.
U.S. consumer inflation slowed in late 2022, thanks to a partial unwinding of the oil and other commodity price spikes seen earlier in the year. But inflation in the services sectors remained “sticky” as tight labor markets continued to push wage costs up at a relatively rapid clip.
“In the U.S., inflation has likely peaked,” Justin predicts. “But the key question is where it lands. And I think it’s unlikely to be at the Fed’s presumed target of 2%. We know that inflationary shocks like this one can take years, not months, to work through. Sticky inflation creates considerable uncertainty about where interest rates will peak in this Fed tightening cycle.
With rates now in “restrictive” territory, Andy says, Fed policymakers may slow the pace of hikes. But futures markets suggest investors still expect the Fed to lift the target for its key policy tool, the federal funds rate, to around 5%.
Fed policymakers hope to be able to pause at some point to allow the impact of previous rate hikes to work their way through the economy, Andy adds. Whether a pause turns into a pivot or is followed by additional hikes, he says, will depend on the balance between inflation and recession risks. But a quick turn to easing in 2023 appears unlikely.
This means investors waiting for a clear sign that Fed policymakers are ready to cut rates could be left standing on the sidelines longer than they currently expect. “A lot of investors are looking for a Fed pivot,” Sébastien says. “But I think it’s unlikely as long as U.S. employment numbers remain strong.”
A Mixed Monetary Picture
The inflation picture is more mixed in other major developed markets, as is the expected path of monetary policy.
Over the longer term, Justin argues, a number of structural factors are likely to tilt the U.S. and other major developed economies toward higher inflation. These include:
U.S. Dollar Strength Could Be Challenged
Fed rate hikes contributed to a surge in the value of the U.S. dollar (USD) in 2022, Justin notes, creating tight conditions for non?U.S. borrowers, both public and private, who rely on USD stocking. Less clear, he says, is whether this trend will continue in 2023.
“The dollar has always traded as a risk?off asset,” Justin observes. “What was unusual this time around was its persistent strength against other major developed market currencies.”
Despite weakening somewhat in the last quarter of 2022, as of late November the USD remained between 35% and 50% overvalued against the euro, the yen, and the British pound on a purchasing power parity basis, Justin estimates.
Exchange rates can defy fundamentals for lengthy periods, Justin notes. But, given the level of USD overvaluation, economic surprises—such as a sooner?than?expected Fed pivot—easily could push the U.S. currency lower in 2023. “We should expect a weaker dollar and think about what that would mean for portfolio construction,” he says.
THEME TWO: Leaning Against the Wind
Soaring bond yields largely drove equity bear markets in 2022 by compressing valuation multiples. But in 2023, earnings growth could move to the top of the list of investor concerns.
As of the end of November, forward consensus estimates predicted mid?single?digit growth in earnings per share (EPS) for the U.S. and Japan over the following 12 months, and even slower EPS growth in Europe and the emerging markets (Figure 3, right).
Those estimates appear overly optimistic, Sébastien cautions. Past U.S. recessions typically have resulted in 15% to 20% earnings declines for the S&P 500 Index, he notes.
Justin lays out three possible U.S. earnings scenarios, the first reflecting a soft landing, the second a “normal” recession, and the third a recession plus a reversal in a 25?year trend toward higher U.S. profit margins.
Although U.S. equity valuations declined sharply in 2022, the price/earnings ratio (P/E) for the S&P 500 remained relatively high historically as of the end of November, Sébastien notes (Figure 3, left). Excess liquidity and demand from passive investors could be propping up the index’s P/E, Sébastien suggests, leaving it vulnerable to further compression if earnings disappoint.
Regime Change Brings New Leadership
Justin notes that growth fears in 2022 boosted the popularity of stocks with relatively low historical exposure to market volatility and of “durable growers”—companies with track records of delivering relatively stable revenue and earnings growth. Both groups now appear overvalued, he says.
The trend toward higher inflation and interest rates, Justin contends, marks a “regime change,” a structural shift with major implications for relative performance.
“We know from history that regime changes nearly always are associated with changes in market leadership,” he says.
The value style should be a long?term beneficiary of this rotation, Justin predicts. “I think we’re probably still in the early innings of this value cycle.”
As a group, value stocks historically have outperformed growth stocks in high?inflation periods, Sébastien notes. One reason: Higher inflation tends to push up interest rates, fattening lending margins for banks, which carry a heavy weight in the value universe.
Value also appears historically inexpensive relative to growth, Sébastien adds, even though U.S. value benchmarks significantly outperformed their growth counterparts in 2022.
U.S. small?cap stocks also could offer relative performance advantages if the U.S. economy doesn’t fall into deep recession in 2023. On average, small?cap earnings have recovered more quickly than large?cap earnings in past economic recoveries, Sébastien points out. U.S. small?cap valuations also appear cheap, both in historical terms and relative to large?caps, he adds.
Justin, however, cautions against painting the small?cap universe with too broad a brush. “It’s a diverse asset class,” he notes. “The more cyclical parts should do well coming out of a recession. But small growth is likely to do less well.”
Tailwinds for Non?U.S. Markets
Regime change—the economic kind—also could boost the appeal of non?U.S. markets in 2023, Justin argues.
Japan could be a less obvious beneficiary of these trends, Justin says. If higher consumer inflation bleeds through into wage growth, it could shock the economy into a higher level of domestic demand, which would be good for Japanese equities.
THEME THREE: The Return of Yield
A brutal year for bond markets in 2022 ended with a silver lining for investors: It raised fixed income yields to some of the most attractive levels seen since the global financial crisis.
Higher yields (Figure 4, left) were mirrored in greatly improved valuations for both sovereigns and private credits, with many sectors selling close to or below their 15?year historical medians as of late November (Figure 4, right). Higher?quality credits in the mortgage?backed and asset?backed sectors also are attracting inflows from investors looking to put cash to work or extend duration (a measure of interest rate sensitivity), Andy adds.
“This is the first opportunity to try to lock in high?single?digit yields in well over a decade,” Andy says. “Anytime there’s been a glimmer that the Fed might be ready to slow its pace, or that inflation might have peaked, we’ve seen money find its way into the market.”
High yield bonds could offer particularly attractive return opportunities in 2023, Andy and Sébastien both say. Sébastien cites three potential positives:
Default rates almost certainly will rise if the U.S. economy slips into recession, Sébastien acknowledges. But it would take a substantial leap to offset the return advantage built into current spreads. “If we get anything outside of a deep recession, the valuation case for U.S. high yield appears pretty strong,” he argues.
As of late November, Andy adds, T. Rowe Price credit analysts estimated that U.S. default rates could rise to slightly under 3% for high yield bonds and just over 3% for floating rate bank loans in 2023, significantly less than current credit spreads.1 This forecast assumes that the U.S. economy passes through a mild recession, Andy adds.
The outlook for European high yield is more guarded, Andy says. While yields have improved there, the value proposition is less compelling because of the economic backdrop, he says.
Illiquid Markets Could Be Volatile
Market liquidity deteriorated in 2022 as monetary tightening accelerated, Andy notes. As central banks shrink their balance sheets in 2023, new buyers will be needed. But stricter capital rules put in place after the global financial crisis have made it harder for bond dealers to function as liquidity providers.
“We’ve already seen bouts of illiquidity in some high?quality markets, like UK gilts and U.S. Treasuries,” Andy notes. “We believe the risk of further episodes remains elevated.”
领英推荐
But poor liquidity and price volatility also can create opportunities for longer?term investors, Andy notes. The U.S. municipal bond market, for example, experienced several months of outflows in late 2022 as investors harvested tax losses and repositioned for higher rates.
Credit conditions in the muni market appear strong, Andy says. State and city governments received federal support during the pandemic shutdown, he notes, and saw tax revenues rise when businesses reopened. Given these fundamentals, muni yields and spreads remained attractive by most historical standards as of late November, which was attracting buyers back to the market.
Diversification in an Inflationary World
Higher volatility also has big implications for portfolio construction, Sébastien says. But the key issue is the source of that volatility and its impact on asset correlations.
Historically, Sébastien says, returns on stocks and on U.S. Treasuries have tended to move in the same direction when worries about inflation and interest rates were high—as they were in 2022. This can destroy the diversification benefits of Treasuries. But when concerns about economic growth are uppermost, returns can move in opposite directions, increasing the diversification benefits of Treasuries.
If 2023 is dominated by concerns about growth, Treasuries could resume their traditional role as portfolio diversifiers, Sébastien predicts. But, over the longer run, he says, different tools may be needed. These could include:
THEME FOUR: Deglobalization in a Connected World
Geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions have led some analysts to question whether an era of economic integration has ended, dimming prospects for productivity and growth. But that risk appears to have been exaggerated, the CIOs say.
“Globalization isn’t dead. It may not even be dying,” Justin argues. Economically, he notes, globalization has been defined by the fivefold rise in international trade as a percentage of world gross domestic product since the early 1950s. While that ratio has stopped rising, it also isn’t falling, he notes.
But recent events have shown that globalization is changing, Justin adds. A number of economies have become dependent on critical imports from one specific part of the world, he says. Europe’s heavy reliance on Russia for natural gas, for example, put its energy security at risk when the war in Ukraine sent gas prices soaring.
Market forces can correct such imbalances if given time, Justin says. This was demonstrated by the large declines seen in European gas prices in the second half of 2022 (Figure 5, left) as demand forecasts were slashed and new supply was rerouted to those markets.
Over the longer run, Justin argues, energy development could drive a massive global surge in capital spending on the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. “The numbers that will be required are mind?boggling,” he says. “I’ve seen estimates as high as USD 100 trillion.”
Capital expenditures on that scale, Justin predicts, should generate investment opportunities on an equally grand scale in the technology, materials, and capital goods sectors, as well as in alternative energy producers and efficiency innovators.
?Global Supply Chains Are Healing
Widespread fears that pandemic?related supply shortages could linger for years, strangling global growth, also appear to have been overly pessimistic, Justin notes. Instead, supply chain reliability improved steadily over the course of 2022 (Figure 5, right).
Moving into 2023 and beyond, supply chains in some industries are likely to be reconfigured to limit future disruptions, Andy argues. This will impose frictional costs. “I think it supports Justin’s argument that inflation will be stickier and volatility higher going forward,” he says.
But adaption also will create potential opportunities for investors, Andy and Justin say. “The companies that can carve out important roles in the newer supply chains will be among the big winners,” Andy predicts. “We think it could be the investing story of the next five years, if not the next decade.”
?Skilled active management will be critical to take advantage of potential opportunities, Andy adds. “Individual name selection will be important. The quality of management teams will become really important.”
A Contrarian Case for China
Investor anxiety about the economic and political future of China, the world’s second?largest economy, weighed heavily on Chinese markets in 2022.
Trade and technology conflicts added to investor malaise, as the Biden administration unveiled new export controls designed to restrict China’s access to advanced semiconductor technologies. “Sentiment about China has never been worse than it is now,” Justin says.
But Justin thinks the pessimism has been overdone. His arguments:
“I understand that these issues will continue to weigh on asset valuations and raise capital costs,” Justin concludes. “But I think we need to stay objective here, keep an open mind, and watch the data points as they evolve.”
Summary
Entering 2023, investors stand at a major turning point in capital market history. The global economy has passed from decades of declining interest rates into a new regime marked by persistent inflationary pressures and higher rates.
“The era of cheap money, high valuations, and super?high asset returns driven by multiple expansion is over,” Justin warns.
Regime change clearly presents risks. But markets may have overreacted to some of those risks in 2022, creating attractive potential opportunities for investors willing to be selectively contrarian:
In this environment, Andy says, investors will need to be able to blend top?down macroeconomic insights with detailed bottom?up fundamental research. “You’ll have to be able to judge how the big macro changes are likely to filter through the markets.”
Finally, some investors may need to adjust their tolerance for risk, Andy concludes. “Many of these issues are just very hard to forecast,” he says. “People will have to expect that their portfolios are going to experience volatility.”
It’s Not the Heat, It’s the Illiquidity
The potential for market volatility will only increase as the Fed and other central banks raise rates and press ahead with quantitative tightening, Sébastien warns. “The biggest risk right now is liquidity.”
In 2022, Sébastien notes, bear markets unfolded in two stages. The first was a rate shock as the Fed raised rates from 0% to 4% over a nine?month period. This was followed by a growth shock as investors discounted the risk of an earnings downturn.
In 2023, Sébastien warns, investors could face a third bear market stage: a liquidity shock, in which markets decline across the board as leveraged positions are unwound. While painful, such shocks also can create major buying opportunities, he says.
“A liquidity event could mark the kind of capitulation that typically has marked the bottom of a bear market,” Sébastien says. “Those historically have been very strong buy signals.”
Successfully timing a market bottom is notoriously difficult, Sébastien notes. But history suggests investors don’t need to be precise to benefit from temporarily depressed equity valuations.
According to Sébastien, in 17 previous major U.S. bear markets (defined as a decline of 15% or more in the S&P 500 Index), an investor who shifted just 10% of their portfolio from bonds to stocks near a market bottom could have significantly enhanced portfolio returns over the subsequent 12 months—even if their timing was three months early, three months late, or somewhere in between.2
Investors may want to be more cautious now, however, Sébastien says. Historically, he notes, the chances of successfully investing around a market bottom were significantly lower when inflation was high and interest rates were rising.
That’s one reason to take a selectively contrarian approach in 2023, Sébastien says: The Fed is no longer backstopping investors by limiting market volatility, a policy known as the “Fed put.” “When there is no Fed put,” he says, “you want to be a bit more patient about leaning in.”
1 Actual future outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
2 Past results are not a reliable indicator of future results. Index performance is for illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of any specific investment. Their performance does not reflect fees and expenses associated with an actual investment. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Actual investment results may differ materially. US Stock returns were based on daily S&P 500 Index total returns from January 3, 1928, through July 31, 2022. Fixed income returns were based on an estimate of daily interpolated returns for the Ibbotson Intermediate Government Bond Index from January 3, 1928, through December 29, 1961, and on daily total returns for the 5?year U.S. Treasury note where daily data were available from January 2, 1962, through July 31, 2022. High inflation and rising rate environments were determined using CPI and 10-year treasury yields.
Additional Disclosures
Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The index is used with permission. The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright ? 2022, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
Copyright ? 2022, Markit Economics Limited now part of S&P Global. All rights reserved and all intellectual property rights retained by S&P Global.
“Bloomberg?” and Bloomberg U.S. Investment Grade Corporate Index, Bloomberg EuroAggregate Credit Index, Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Credit–Corporate High Yield Index, Bloomberg Global High Yield Index, and Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Index are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the index (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by T. Rowe Price. Bloomberg is not affiliated with T. Rowe Price, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend T. Rowe Price products. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to T. Rowe Price products.
The “S&P 500 Index” is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, or its affiliates (“SPDJI”), and has been licensed for use by T. Rowe Price. Standard & Poor’s? and S&P? are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a division of S&P Global (“S&P”); Dow Jones? is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by SPDJI and sublicensed for certain purposes by T. Rowe Price. T. Rowe Price products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates, and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of the S&P 500 Index.
MSCI and its affiliates and third party sources and providers (collectively, “MSCI”) makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. Historical MSCI data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.
Important Information
This material is being furnished for general informational and does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial, and tax advice before making any investment decision. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation, or a solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.
The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates.
Investment Risks: International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. These risks are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. Small?cap stocks have generally been more volatile in price than the large?cap stocks. The value approach to investing carries the risk that the market will not recognize a security’s intrinsic value for a long time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced. Growth stocks are subject to the volatility inherent in common stock investing, and their share price may fluctuate more than that of income?oriented stocks. Sustainable investing may not succeed in generating a positive environmental and/or social impact. Real estate is affected by general economic conditions. When growth is slowing, demand for property decreases and prices may decline. Active investing may have higher costs than passive investing and may underperform the broad market with similar objectives. Alternative investments may involve a high degree of risk, may undertake more use of leverage and derivatives, and are not suitable for all investors. Fixed?income securities are subject to credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and interest?rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall. Investments in high?yield bonds involve greater risk of price volatility, illiquidity, and default than higher?rated debt securities. Investments in bank loans may at times become difficult to value and highly illiquid; they are subject to credit risk such as nonpayment of principal or interest, and risks of bankruptcy and insolvency. Commodities are subject to increased risks such as higher price volatility, geopolitical and other risks. Derivatives may be riskier or more volatile than other types of investments because they are generally more sensitive to changes in market or economic conditions. Risks include currency risk, leverage risk, liquidity risk, index risk, pricing risk, and counterparty risk. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. There is no assurance that any investment objective will be met.
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
? 2022 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
202212- 2647220
Pioneering the Clean Energy Movement || Leading Willdan's Charge to Sustainable Energy || Learn more about sustainable energy solutions at Willdan.com || President, Willdan - Performance Engineering
1 年Navigating the evolving investment landscape is paramount. In your opinion, which of the discussed themes will demand the most agility and strategic adaptation from investors in the coming year?
"The Day Is Only Wasted If You Did Not Learn From It"
2 年It would be a good idea to dump Joyy Inc stock before it is too late
President at The Mimco Group
2 年In other words, on one hand ……??
Certified Life and Relationship Coach /Team Building Specialist
2 年Vicious cycle of abuse of our citizens: money is printed that we don’t have and spent on things we don’t want or need, our money is then worth less and less, rates are then hiked beyond belief to try to control worth of said money. How about we just stop printing and spending what we don’t have on what we don’t want or need? How about we plug the hole in the boat instead of just bailing water and crippling our people? How about we start using sound, all of the above energy policy with a focus on what actually works and is affordable instead of killing our grid and productivity?