4 Lessons for Brands From the Super Bowl LII Ads
Photo: iStock

4 Lessons for Brands From the Super Bowl LII Ads

By Jim Stengel, Suzanne Tosolini, and Samantha Avivi

Super Bowl LII did not disappoint in terms of providing us with celebrity-filled, big spend productions ranging from the weird and wacky to the hilarious. However, it did disappoint in more cases than it should. In this expensive media venue, brands should be pulling these aspects together in a way that both engages and sells a brand, or at least connects us to the brand more deeply.

Here are our four lessons from the Super Bowl LII ads:

The best ads did not forget the fundamentals of great creative work: A clear simple benefit, a great idea, engaging drama and excellence in craft were all loud and proud in our favorite ads this year.

Tide is a master-class case in this regard. The strategy was simple: anything clean was washed in Tide. The “Every Ad is a Tide Ad” is an idea that reminds you how important creatives are to brand marketing. The drama of the Tide ads is engaging and distinctive as it pokes fun at the norms of the Super Bowl classic ad categories like beer and cars, using iconic scenes from great ads like Old Spice and Mr. Clean. Finally, the excellence in craft shows up in the masterful build up of the four ads, the outstanding casting and ‘just right’ humor. Truly great work P&G and Saatchi & Saatchi New York.

The Doritos/Mountain Dew ad delivered similar mastery of fundamentals and stood out for the excellence of craft. The casting, perfect lip syncing, and fun touches throughout made the work so engaging, you want to watch it over and over. The idea was fantastic; the strategy was simple and clear; the production value was huge, with the added bonus of it being a “buy one, get one” media approach.

Alexa nailed many of the fundamentals, too, although we do wonder what the strategy was beyond reminding us of the brand.

The NFL outdid themselves to launch its new ruling on player celebrations – this one may well bring the spark back into the on-again off-again love affair with the NFL.

Sprint’s “Evelyn’ did a very nice job too with a clear and consistent strategy; an idea that plays off all our zeitgeist-y fears of AI; drama which made you laugh and creeped you out all at the same time. Nicely done, Sprint.

Purpose-driven advertising only works when it is tied to the brand in a meaningful way: This year we had a few that did this well, but oh so many that did not.

Toyota‘s purpose is to keep people moving; Jeep’s purpose is to keep us off-road exploring; Bud Light exists to be the friend you can count on; Groupon exists to support local business; and Ram is there to help us serve. All of these purpose statements work because the product supports the higher purpose in a tangible, meaningful way. Verizon also showed promise of a move from a 100% product claim to something more purposeful with its ‘answering the call’ ad. However, others really fell flat in their purpose journeys.

It seems T-Mobile has moved from its brash, rebel positioning couched in bright magenta to a soothing, cool gray, baby-filled message on diversity. Our heads were swiveling too fast to even try to fit the brand benefit into that. This new diversity purpose does not fit the brand.

Coke has also moved from its upbeat, happiness-inducing celebration of unity into a mellow reminder that we are all special and unique. This work certainly did not feel like the Coke we all love that inspires optimism.

Pepsi - the choice of the new generation is celebrating the ads of the old generation. This concept created a brain freeze for us to figure out. We assume that the tone-deaf Kendall Jenner ad has put the idea of appealing to a new generation on hold.

Kraft exists to bring smiles to people’s faces. The idea to celebrate all the unique ways we ‘family’ was a decent one, but it was also generic. Any brand that targets families could have had its logo mark at the end of the spot.

Purpose is not a new concept. It is almost a requirement for great brand building. This year’s ads were largely a disappointing collection of brands unable to connect their message to a higher purpose.

Context is as important as content: If you are going to pay so much to air your work on the biggest stage – the Super Bowl - then you really do need to think about the context as you create your content. Far too many brands forgot the setting they would be shown in. These ads would have otherwise been good – or even great - work in another environment. By airing during the Super Bowl, this work was downgraded to mediocre at best.

Wendy’s “Frozen” was enjoyed for the shade it threw at McDonald’s, but would have been a far bigger hit of the night had they left it on social media. No one wants snarky energy during the Super Bowl; we want upbeat, big scale entertainment to accompany the modern day gladiators on the gridiron.

E-trade, Persil, Wix, Sketchers, Turbo Tax –the demos and self-promotion just didn’t fit this atmosphere.

Adding celebrities or extra wacky and weird cannot save an ad without an idea: The Super Bowl ads are infamous for the level of weird and wacky humor and the prevalence of celebrities. The brands that excel with this have these elements on top of the fundamentals of a clear strategy and an outstanding idea.

This year Doritos/Mountain Dew, Alexa, NFL all succeeded in this. Squarespace, Michelob, Universal, M&M’s, Ram Vikings, and Diet Coke on the other hand all floundered here. We need more than a celebrity and/or weirdness to make a memorable, engaging, behavior changing, world-class ad.

---

Jim Stengel, founder of The Jim Stengel Company, and adjunct professor at the Kellogg School of Management, worked at Procter & Gamble for 25 years and was the global marketing officer from 2001-2008.

Suzanne Tosolini has 25+ years experience at Procter & Gamble as a Brand Strategist working with leading brands in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, and North America. Suzanne is currently a Growth Consultant with The Jim Stengel Company.

Samantha Avivi has 20+ years of Client, Agency and Retail experience with some of the world largest companies including Procter & Gamble, Kimberly Clark, Wal-Mart, BBDO and Y&R and leading iconic brands such as M&M’s, Pampers, Fisher Price and ADT. She is currently a Growth Consultant with The Jim Stengel Company.

Omar M. Khateeb

Helping Medtech Grow Sales Pipeline & Find Investors Using Social Media |??? Host of MedTech's #1 Podcast | Proud Husband & Father | Avid Reader | Jiu Jitsu @Carlson Gracie | Mentor | Coach

6 年

Jim Stengel - “Purpose-driven advertising only works when it is tied to the brand in a meaningful way”- absolutely agree. Another reason why finding a brand’s one fundamental human value is key. Loved the insight you shared in “Grow”.

回复
Philippe Bovay

33 years in P&G, initially marketing then General Management and CEO of various subsidiaries, now retired.

6 年

Hi Jim, love your analysis, insightful as always. However I have a different view on the Tide ads. As I see it, Tide is more expensive than all other detergents in the US. Consumers are not going to spend their hard earned money for a premium brand unless there is a good reason to. Of course the product needs to be superior. But the advertising also needs to be persuasive in communicating that superiority. There is none of that in the Tide Super Bowl commercials. No competitive failure, no visualization of superiority versus competition, no reason why Tide formulation is better than competition, no “what is the positive impact of Tide in my life”. People will no doubt talk about the advertising, but will not be convinced by the ads to move from their own brand to Tide, and current Tide users will remain susceptible to moving to a lower price brand on promotion in their store. Net, the advertising makes Agencies and P&Gers happy because it is fun, but will be ineffective in growing the business . I do not think this is the way forward for P&G to accelerate business growth. A return to the fundamentals of image building and business building advertising is necessary, as you taught us so well when CMO.

回复
Laura Ashton

INED Board Director | ESG, Sustainability & Energy Transition |Strategy | Founder/Investor

6 年

Thanks for this thoughtful, succinct analysis. The best of these ads entertain while remaining true to their brand essence. With those brands that strayed, expensively, into gimmick or "what do millennials want?" territory, I wonder where the adult supervision in Marketing leadership was when approvals were given.

回复
Patrick Rooney

HEAD OF MARKETING I PROBLEM SOLVER I CLEANER/FIXER

6 年

Jim, as usual, on point - especially about context. Glad to see spots this year that typically don't end with a gag as the payoff but rather real meaning.

回复
Stuart Sheldon

Leader / People / Strategy / Marketing / General Manager

6 年

Thanks for sharing, Jim Stengel. Paid media (including much of what brands put on their #socialmedia channels and tout as " #engagement ") is time-proven to deliver awareness...and not much more. Brands who want folks to connect more deeply need to offer more immersive and long-form #experiences than Paid Media can provide. #Experiential marketing and similar tactics carry the day here! https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/45m-super-bowl-spot-stuart-sheldon/?trackingId=ClVO64AhpDopsLldX0HUsg%3D%3D

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了