4-D thinking
Highly effective CEOs share a rare capacity to assess situations from four dimensions of themselves (1st), other people's perspectives (2nd), all people's perspectives (3rd ), and the systemic perspective (4th). ?
Why it matters: 4-D thinking is an impactful way to seize opportunities, overcome challenges, and make decisions in high complexity, but it isn't a learned skill; it's a developmental capacity.
The big picture: 4-D thinking is the extension of 3-D thinking that helps CEOs align their executives amidst conflicts?in which they have different perspectives.
1-D thinking
1st person's perspective?- subjective to the person's mindset. You see only one perspective: yours.
2-D thinking
2nd person's perspective?- able to see the other's perspective.
You can see, relate, and acknowledge other perspectives:
3-D thinking
3rd person's perspective can look at a situation from all aspects in the context of the system they operate.?
4-D thinking
4th person's perspective is capable of multi-dimensional thinking that evolves with the ability to shift attention from advocating and promoting your perspective to inquiring about other perspectives.
Develop 4-D thinking:
Here are a few strategies you can try, even if you don't know what level of potential you are playing at.
1.?Identify your primary stakeholders
I have yet to work with a team that quickly agrees on the primary stakeholders without argument.
The common ones are the board, customers, partners, employees, etc. Agreement on the primary stakeholders is key to team alignment.
The major criterion for decision is how critical a stakeholder is to the company's future.
领英推荐
Backstory
Senior leadership team members of a medical device company were all over the place when they tried to reach a consensus about the primary stakeholder.
Should it be the board, patients, hospitals, insurers, or surgeons?
Eventually, they narrowed it to patients and surgeons and ultimately decided on surgeons. ?
They hadn't thought of that before, and that choice immensely impacted their strategy and resource allocation.
2.??Step into their shoes
Once you have a primary stakeholder (or two), you virtually 'invite' them to your meetings to actively participate.
Well, not really.
When you want to tap into 4-D thinking, ask one or two team members to represent the stakeholders in the meeting. In remote meetings, they change the name into a persona and act as the stakeholders' avatars.
Another team member is an observer. Just a fly on the wall who isn't participating but noticing what is happening in the conversation from rational and emotional perspectives.
If the team takes it seriously and gets better at having open conversations with avatar stakeholders, you will gain insights, perspectives, and ideas you wouldn't get otherwise.
Additional tips:
3.?Develop systemic relationships with stakeholders
Very few leadership teams meet primary stakeholders together as a team. Typically one or two team members maintain relationships ?(CRO/CMO). When the team meets stakeholders, even annually or biannually, everybody (COO/CFO) gets access to systemic thinking from another perspective.
Additional tips:
4.??Collect data about stakeholders' perspectives
Like 360-degree assessments that provide feedback from stakeholders to individuals, we use team and organizational collective assessment to get a 4-D perspective from external stakeholders who see the team from the outside.
Many team assessments are out there, but most are taken by the team members, which helps build a 3-D perspective. But to get a 4-D perspective, you need external insight.
Our clients use team and organizational-level assessments such as the Collective Leadership Assessment built on the Leadership Circle framework.
Senior leadership teams that take the Leadership Circle Profile individually love using the same framework to collectively gain a 4-D perspective.
The bottom line
Use the four strategies to develop 4-D thinking and create an external perspective of the leadership team.
At the same time, deeper relationships with primary stakeholders should be developed.
These relationships should be dynamic and emergent: