3D Printing vs 5 Axis Machining - Fixtures
Sean Vincent
President at Maxx Tooling | Leading strategic investments in technology and manufacturing operations
Synergi is currently working with partner manufacturers to integrate 3D FDM and DMLS Technology into their Prototype/Production Tooling and Fixture and Gauge builds.
Complex water requirements? Lifters and Slides complete with water?
Shortened Delivery? We can help you to understand the benefits of exploring
integrate 3D FDM and DMLS Technology into standard tooling builds.
We provide strategic introductions to partnerships with source capabilities.
Case Study
6061 Aluminum vs. ABS
TRADITIONAL MACHINING VS. 3D PRINTING
We start with a surrogate part and then built it twice. One we print the part using ABS thermoplastic. The other we mill and machine out of 6061 aluminum.Then chart and analyze both processes for speed, accuracy, and cost-efficiency.
LIGHTER, FASTER, ACCURATE
Cut down the pounds
The Baker 3D Solutions test check fixture achieved a weight saving of almost 90% compared to 6061 Aluminum.
Use less, Save more
3D printing uses only the material it needs, resulting in 70% savings in material costs.
Timing is everything
3D printers save time by eliminating multiple set ups and tool changes. The Baker 3D Solutions test fixture was 3D printed in a little over half the time over a 5-axis machine.
Accuracy
Baker 3D Solutions can print with an accuracy of +/- 0.005″, and inspect with the latest scanning technologies.
90% Weight Savings
- from 12 lbs to 3 lbs Weight (Lbs.)
Now, we are not saying every part should be made a certain way. Yet there are some serious advantages to using 3D printed parts. This is meant to give an idea of what this method is good for, and help you decide if it is just what you need for your next project.
Head - Forward Model ( Mfg. Engg. & Industrialization), VLS India
8 å¹´Its a great Technology..... But what about investment cost ?