300Cubits suspend operations

300Cubits suspend operations

Blockchain based 300Cubits has announced that they will suspend the operation of the Booking Deposit Module for container shipping as of October 1st.

That we are seeing one of the freight-tech companies put an end to their initial core product is not surprising. One of the outcomes from my book "Liner Shipping 2025" which was published in 2017 was that we would be seeing a strong increase in the number of freight-tech companies in the short term. This was driven by a clear need for new technological tools and solutions in the shipping industry.

But it was also made clear that all of these should be seen as "experiments" - all would likely have good ideas and concepts. At least good enough to warrant the first investments. But following an initial period of a couple of years it would be crunch time - after that period, the cash from the initial funding rounds would be running dry, and in order to push forward, the companies would need to show real and tangible business uptake for their concepts.

This is no different than for start-ups in any other industry. The interesting part is that the shipping industry finally reached a tipping point where digitalization was gathering speed rapidly, and hence the field for tech start-ups was wide open leading to a mass injection of new companies in a short span of time.

It is not easy to determine beforehand which companies will make it through this second cut as it depends not only on the merits of their tools and ideas but also on the ability to gain commercial traction with the customers as well as the ability to develop and deploy the practical tools.

The outcome we now see from 300cubits is a sign of this anticipated change - we are getting to the point where the plethora of new freight tech companies launched in recent years is reaching this important cut-off-point in the digitalization of the shipping industry. In essence: Do they show sufficient actual commercial traction warranting further investment, or will they be left by the wayside?

The expectation would be that in the coming year we will see more of this with freight tech companies either making it to the next round and accelerating the growth they have been able to show thus far, or a pull-back from an idea which didn't pan out commercially. And make no mistake, we are entering a phase where it is the actual business-uptake of the tools and ideas which is becoming more important than the concept of the underlying ideas.

Shipping, after all, is a practical craft where a profit has to be shown at the end of the day – and digital tools are now getting out of the early incubators and have to prove their mettle in this respect.

Disclaimer: Please note that in addition to being an analyst I am also a current advisor to, and former board member of, NYSHEX.

Prapul Palli

Team Lead - Digital Marketing | Growth Strategy & Insights | Competitive Intelligence | B2B | SEO | SMM | Email Marketer | Expert in Lead Generation Inbound Marketing & Outbound Marketing | B2B Sales Conversion Helper.

5 年

Shipping Containers Research Report@ https://bit.ly/2ArAmgm

回复
Roar Adland (Ph.D., FICS)

Senior Director - Global Head of Research

5 年

Well, this was one of the ventures where the underlying idea was questionable upfront so no surprises here. This was my Linkedin comment on 300Cubits two years ago: https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/activity-6321670819714076672-68Rb Not being an expert on blockchain and shipping (yet), one question struck my mind upon reading this SCMP piece: The value of the TEU token is effectively supposed to be the "alternative cost" of a "no show" container. The white paper claims that this will be equal to the freight rate. A freight rate is by definition not something that inflates/appreciates over time (high rates induces increasing deliveries of ships and lower rates). Then, how would investors in the TEU coin make money over time? Perhaps someone can enlighten this simple economist engineer.

Shachar Tal

Innovator, Loginno Co-Founder, Contopia creator, Smart Shipping Container technology promoter

5 年

So true. No sustainable value - no future for a startup... Wishing the team a swift recovery and may the next venture be a unicorn!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lars Jensen的更多文章

  • Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    When I first got involved in maritime cyber security in 2014 with CyberKeel (now a part of Improsec) we approached a…

    4 条评论
  • Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Amongst the container lines, the two frontrunners on online digital container freight sales are Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd…

    8 条评论
  • Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Actual measurements of the demand impact on container trade still do not exist. All the data sources which measure this…

    1 条评论
  • Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    In the investor conference call held by Maersk today (20 Feb) after release of their 2019 annual accounts, numbers on…

    5 条评论
  • Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    The impact on container shipping keeps worsening. According to the latest SeaIntelligence Sunday Spotlight the carriers…

    5 条评论
  • Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    The Sea-Intelligence Sunday Spotlight has just been published – 2 days earlier than usual in order to provide a timely…

    11 条评论
  • December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    Container Trade Statistics has published the December data for global container shipments. North American imports…

  • Are you ready for IMO2021?

    Are you ready for IMO2021?

    As all are acutely aware, IMO2020 is upon us and 2019’s mad scramble to comply with the new low-Sulphur rules is coming…

    5 条评论
  • Now: Additional BAF increases

    Now: Additional BAF increases

    Maersk appears to be the first container carrier to announce additional BAF increases triggered by the sharp increases…

    12 条评论
  • BAF: More increases to come

    BAF: More increases to come

    We are now 3 weeks into the new IMO2020 low-Sulphur regime, and two aspects are emerging for the container shipping…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了