3 solutions to improve your hiring success in a candidate driven market
Alex Cooke
Life Sciences Executive Search Leader | Forbes HR Council Leader | Host of Biotech Leadership Podcast
Across our community of CHROs, TA leaders, Hiring Managers and job seekers most people are aware that “the great resignation” and the resumption of hiring (delayed from the earlier months of covid) have resulted in a candidate-driven market. This is search language for when there are more jobs than people to fill them and that every potential hire has multiple options to choose from. It also means that rival companies are pushing salaries up, HR leaders are struggling with internal salary compression (when lower-level team member salaries are outstripping their line managers leading to dissatisfaction and a lack of reward to progress into areas of greater responsibility) and those companies that appear to give more, will attract more.?
In the world of search, people believe that this is a good thing that businesses are turning to search and contingent recruitment firms to help attract the best talent. There is validity that client acquisition is easier in this type of market but it also means that our job is harder. With more search firms engaged, there are more firms hunting in the same pool of candidates. As a result, candidates will be getting bombarded by pitches and calls. The net result is candidate FATIGUE and engagement rates being driven down across the board.?
This fatigue leads to less engagement and reduced talent pipelines. These reduced talent pipelines mean a higher risk of positions staying open because there is less talent depth to cover competition and candidate dropout.?
In brief, here are 3 tested ways to possibly come out on top during this time:?
ENGAGE with potential hires as much as possible:?
?
OPTIMIZE your hiring process:
领英推荐
RETAIN your best people and encourage them to make the difference:
?
The idea that everyone is replaceable is true but only over time. In a candidate-driven market you’re looking at longer lead times to hire employees of equal or better skill. Even if you can pull in the right new hire, you will experience a delay in performance as the new leader goes through the onboarding learning curve. Throw in that leadership changes in a high-performing team is likely to lead to team churn and you must ask, can you afford an exodus from this high-performing team? If your skills are compromised at this critical time, how will that impact output? What is the business cost of that reduced output? And lastly, when does the controlled cost of a cash incentive scheme become cheaper than the impact of being under-staffed and under-skilled?
?
In summary, it’s hard for every business to attract the best talent in a candidate market. However, the businesses that ENGAGE more, OPTIMIZE their processes, and RETAIN their best people will be the ones that come out on top.?
?
If ever there was a time to do make the case to do something new in the world of hiring, now is the time.
CxO Referral Leader at EY | Partnering with Clients to Deliver Strategic Executive Talent Solutions
3 年Alex Cooke - thank you for sharing. Very important for clients to enhance the candidate experience, especially in this market!
Global Human Resources Executive
3 年Great points and all very true. Thanks for sharing your insights