3 Reasons Not to Run a Trainer Certification
Sustainability has become an imperative in the approach that organizations take to develop employees. We are moving away from a tick-in-box training program delivered by external or internal facilitators. A 70:20:10 approach to development or its near equivalent is the way forward.
With these changes in the development approach, classroom training has become a rare commodity and its impact on participants is under scrutiny. One approach organizations are taking is to certify their internal talent on industry-recognized training programs. This way there is sustainability and greater impact through the organizational context that internal facilitators bring to the table.
Here are 3 Reasons why this approach for running Trainer Certification can fail!
1) No Time
Business pressures have internal stakeholders battling their time schedules and spending 2 to 3 days in a Trainer Certification seems difficult. The key to overcome this challenge is
- Get Executive Sponsorship
- Go with a Business Case
- Showcase value of Certification to Personal Career Aspirations
2) Inflexible Training Partners
Proposals for Trainer Certifications often come with a very high upfront investment. Training Partners are asking for a minimum commitment for the number of participants to charge the IP fee in advance. The key to overcome this challenge is
- Negotiate with Training Partners on payment terms or
- Look for alternative companies who are more flexible
3) Accountability of Internal Trainers
Once certified - Trainers often get back to BAU (Business as Usual) and it becomes hard to hold them accountable for the commitments they made as trainers. The key to overcome this challenge is
- Agree on KPI's or Metrics that they would be measured on
- Review these KPI's regularly and
- Reward and Recognize the Internal Trainers
Trainer Certifications may seem like an overwhelming Storm!
However, there is hope on the horizon, as long as we are able to recognize the key challenges in our organization and overcome these to make classroom training more sustainable, more relevant and more impactful.
Delivery Manager & Army Signal Brigade Staff Officer
7 年Great comments. Many organisations will provide quality training for new entrants and then again for experienced employees and quite often there is a void in the middle where employees are left to fend for themselves. An Associate of mine works for Airbus who seem to have a very forward leaning L&D program where employees are expected to evidence their development in a variety of areas set by the company and specific to their role. These are then validated by the L&D Specialists within the company. They embrace the idea of continuous improvement and development in their staff and this is then in turn reflected in their products.
Group Vice President | Org Design & Development | Restructuring & Org Efficiency | HR Strategy & Org Analytics | Workforce Planning & Optimization | Merger, Acquisition & Integration
7 年Great Article Ash. I remember our Jindal times, building SME pool for TTT certification. Good Insights.
Thanks Padmakar! We had our own experience of Trainer Certifications at CHL...
Good one Ashirvad Lobo