3 Key Insights from the PassivHaus Playbook
During my summer break, I finally caught up on some reading and delved into the PassivHaus Playbook, released in November 2023. Here are three fascinating takeaways:
My perspective? A cost uplift below 3% seems like a best-case scenario for PassivHaus Certification, mainly applicable to large-scale projects due to economies of scale. Smaller projects might see a higher percentage increase.
Have you seen similar trends in your PassivHaus projects? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this!
Kudos to Development Victoria , Australian Passivhaus Association , and Introba Australia for this insightful resource!
#PassivHaus #SustainableDevelopment #GreenBuilding #ConstructionInnovation
Co-Founder, Expert Witness & Building Physics Nerd ??
1 年Professional fees need to be much higher so consultants don't lose money on projects.... and I would question that 2.8% if we are to be honest. If you want a Ferrari, expect to pay for it. Great resource, though.
Co-Founder - CEO, CTO @ BULCS Holding | WLS, CLS, CMP, ATFA level 3(Quality Assured Contractor) AM.AIRAH, Triple Master Restore
1 年Thank you for sharing however th cost of damage due to condensation and mould is still not well documented which can clearly ascise why added cost to MVHR is required. I love to see more training on installation sometimes incorrect installation could even be more of an issue. Hence these conversation like this is so important.
Sustainability & Building Performance at Atelier Ten
1 年Great post! What jumps out for me is the biggest increase to capital cost is from the MVHR - this is a piece of equipment that improves indoor environment quality, reduces risk of condensation and risk of mould in addition to providing heat recovery & reducing heating demand. Why wouldn't you want one anyway?! .. not to mention these are almost ubiquitous in new apartments in London!