6. How might we preempt the town-gown split between theory and practice and the false thinking-doing dichotomies?
Rick Botelho
Unite Equity Muses | Ask ethical questions about co-designing a fair-free-flourishing future
For deep thinkers, learning how to integrate theory and thinking with the practice of doing
Inviting all learning design architects, leaders, academics, researchers, mentors, muses, mavens, and practitioners to compose complex questions for generating the dialogues needed to solve our wicked problems.
Wicked problems are complex in that they have no single, simple, definitive, or final solutions, with no right-wrong answers. Wicked problems call for developing self-awareness, ontological, equanimity, ethical discernment, media literacy, empathy, and complexity skills, and many more.
We need a transformational learning revolution to provide exponential opportunities to unravel our complex entanglement of self-inflicted wicked problems.
Complex questions take us beyond reductionist language, talking, and writing about thinking and doing that focus predominantly on individual influences and not galvanized mass movements aligned for transformational change.
Copy and paste the headline question into AI tools as a mini-experiment to make sense of its meaning and implications.
Cut and paste any other bulleted question, concept, statement, or paragraph into perplexity.ai and any other AI tool to compare and contrast outputs. Use the citations to make sense of their meaning as part of our collaborative learning journeys.
Unleash your curiosity. Ask questions about any concept and question, such as:
These mini-learning exercises set up the inquiry processes for understanding complexity before engaging in dialogue sessions.
Each dialogue module (1-6) provides advanced preparation to understand complex questions before participating in dialogue sessions (10-30 minutes), depending on the group size.
Updated episodically based on reflections and feedback (4/17/2024).
How might we preempt the town-gown split between theory and practice and the false thinking-doing dichotomies?
Thinkers think doers do not know what they are doing. Doers think thinkers do not know how to do about what they are thinking. This dysfunctional town-gown, reductionist split between theory and practice, calls for collaborative learning.
This question calls for understanding the internal battle of our minds: the interactions of our neo-cortical brain of the equanimity, our limbic-amygdala brain driving our emotions, and our reptilian brain triggering the fight-flight-freeze responses.
领英推荐
A self-awareness about how our brain functions enables us to engage in dialogues without regressing to dysfunctional debates.
How might we co-create generative-strategic dialogues to:
This learning process prepares learners to develop a broad array of capabilities, such as self-awareness, ethical discernment, emotional regulation, and critical thinking skills, to work on these noble questions.
How might we move beyond:
Cultural humility is taking the one-down position in exploring and understanding different cultures. These lifelong self-reflecting and collaborative learning processes involve understanding and redressing power imbalances for developing trust-based and authentic partnerships with different cultural backgrounds.
Moral humility is an openness to understanding how our ethical discernments are lacking and being open to revising them based on feedback, reason, and different perspectives.
Ethical humility involves a self-reflective process of becoming aware of our biases in making immoral-amoral-moral discernments. This calls for an openness in re-evaluating our discernment skills to avoid the pitfalls of self-righteous fundamentalism and moral absolutism.
Cultural, moral, and ethical humility call for developing meta-cognition skills: exploring and challenging ourselves about how we think, and how we think about thinking. Without meta-cognition, we are unaware of cultural, moral, and ethical indoctrinations. We think that we know what we are, but do not know what we are doing.
Paraphrasing Aristotle, we embed our metaphors in our everyday language. We live by them without full awareness, such as the competitive win-loss metaphors of war and sports metaphors. We are largely unaware of how our metaphors govern how we think. This calls for using the diversity of metaphors to empower us to overcome our resistance to thinking about how we think.
Click on the image to review dialogue learning modules 1-10
How might we, as leaders, mentors, educators, and learners, amplify human-AI synergies to cultivate equity meta-governance, unravel our meta-crisis, and solve our poly-crisis of wicked problems?
Click on image to review dialogue learning modules 1-20.
How might we develop AI-enabled digital learning platforms and eco-systems to deliver exponential opportunities for cultivating equity meta-governance to solve our complex web of wicked problems?