A $24.5 million Permitting Mistake

Imagine this: A company operating in New Mexico found itself slapped with a staggering $24.5 million in penalties after citizen complaints triggered an investigation by the state's environmental agency, revealing a compliance nightmare.

Let's dissect the number of failures that led to this costly fine.

Firstly, the company failed to construct and operate facilities in accordance with the representations made in their permit applications – a fundamental breach of trust with regulators. Furthermore, they neglected to obtain the necessary construction permits for modifications that exceeded the thresholds of their general permits.

But the violations didn't stop there. The company also fell short in properly operating and controlling tank emissions through the required vapor recovery units, a critical measure for mitigating air pollution. Compounding this issue, they failed to conduct and document inspections of these vapor recovery systems, essentially rendering them ineffective.

Shockingly, the company even dropped the ball on routine monthly inspections of their vapor recovery towers – a basic requirement outlined in their permits. It's as if they were intentionally courting trouble.

Perhaps most egregiously, the company blatantly disregarded the permitted emission limits for their facilities, allowing pollutants to be released at levels exceeding those specified in their applications and registrations.

Now, I know what you might be thinking: "That's a lot of violations! How could a company be so careless?" And you'd be absolutely right to question their apparent disregard for compliance. But the reality is, this serves as a stark reminder that cutting corners or overlooking regulatory requirements can have severe financial consequences.

Let's not mince words here – a $24.5 million penalty is a brutal wake-up call. It's a sum that could cripple even the most well-established companies, all because they failed to prioritize regulatory compliance.

But here's the silver lining: This case presents an opportunity for us, as industry professionals, to learn from their mistakes and fortify our own compliance practices.

It's time to buckle down and ensure that our operations are in immaculate shape. Conduct thorough permit reviews, implement rigorous inspections and recordkeeping procedures, stay vigilant with emissions monitoring and control, and invest in comprehensive employee training. Let's take this stuff more seriously and create a culture of accountability and environmental compliance that permeates every aspect of our operations.

And let's not forget the invaluable role of third-party audits. Fresh eyes can often catch potential issues that may have gone unnoticed, allowing us to address them proactively before they escalate into major compliance nightmares.

As citizen complaints continue to rise and regulators maintain a watchful eye, we simply cannot afford to be complacent. The consequences are too severe, both financially and in terms of non-compliance.

Let this be our "let's get'r done" rallying cry for excellence in regulatory compliance... to embrace best practices, make accountability and transparency a real thing, and diligently protect our natural resources while ensuring that our operations proceed smoothly and safe.

Because let's be honest – no one wants to be that company writing a $24.5 million check for avoidable mistakes. That's a compliance lesson we can't afford to learn the hard way.

Sign up for my free [tc] newsletter here.

Disclaimer: this is not legal advice and should not be construed as such.