A 20th Century Mindset in a 21st Century Cyberthreat Landscape?

A 20th Century Mindset in a 21st Century Cyberthreat Landscape?

The digital age has introduced a new set of challenges, marked by the continuous evolution of cyber threats. However, some corporate leaders continue to apply traditional strategies that may not fully address these modern digital risks. This gap between the nuances of current threats and the traditional approaches to risk management may contribute to the rising frequency and severity of data breaches.

One reason for the ongoing use of traditional strategies can often be attributed to the unfamiliarity with the digital landscape. Executives with extensive experience in managing physical security, for example, may find it more challenging to navigate the complexities of cyber threats, which operate in a digital environment. This difference in familiarity can sometimes lead to hesitation in adopting modern security measures or in allocating sufficient resources to cybersecurity initiatives.

Additionally, traditional risk management frameworks often emphasize the protection of tangible assets, which can result in less focus on safeguarding digital assets. This approach may not fully account for the potential impact of data breaches on a company’s reputation, financial health, and long-term viability.

The reliance on established metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) may also influence how cybersecurity risks are managed. Metrics that focus on revenue growth and profitability might not adequately capture the risks associated with cyber threats. As a result, there may be a disconnect between a company’s financial performance and its vulnerability to cyber incidents, leading to a potential underinvestment in cybersecurity measures.

The structure of corporate decision-making processes can also play a role. In hierarchical organizations, cybersecurity decisions are often made at the executive level, where there may be limited technical expertise. This can sometimes result in security measures that do not fully address the specific needs or emerging threats faced by the organization.

Finally, the potential disruption associated with implementing new cybersecurity strategies may lead to a cautious approach. The desire for stability can sometimes deter organizations from adopting innovative technologies or making significant changes to their cybersecurity practices.

Addressing these challenges may involve fostering a culture of innovation, investing in modern security technologies, and adopting more proactive risk management strategies. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, organizations may need to adapt their approaches to better protect against cyber threats. For corporate leaders seeking to navigate these complexities, the DVMS Institute offers resources and guidance on developing and implementing cybersecurity strategies tailored to the demands of the digital age.

Watch our Cultural Awareness Tool video below to learn how you can change your organizational mindset:

DVMS Cybersecurity Culture Assessment Tool (DVMS-CAT?) analyses cyber risk and provides organisations with a comprehensive understanding of their workplace culture, identifying strengths and areas for improvement. It uncovers and understands the implicit rules that guide interactions, the shared assumptions that influence decisions, and the narratives that unify the organisation. Developing this proactive culture leads to employees feeling more empowered and confident to report issues before problems occur.

Turn your biggest weakness into your greatest asset

Harold Sherrill

Manager, Regulatory Compliance & Continuous Improvement at Entergy. MBA, Six Sigma Blk Belt, DVMS NIST-CSF Foundation, Continuous Improvement Specialist, & Scrum Master.

6 个月

Very informative!

Jeff Mochan

SECU Ltd, Riyadh, KSA | Physical Security | Operational Risk | Program Management | Strategy | Capability Development | ASIS CPP | MSyI | MCMI

6 个月

Interesting article DVMS Institute thanks for posting. I recognise a lot of that. One observation I’d make is that there’s not the difference you suggest between physical and cyber nowadays - I’d say they’re mutually supporting and both vulnerable to the same threats and cultural weaknesses you describe.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

DVMS Institute的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了