A 2025 Guide to Post-Truth America
Gini Dietrich
CEO at Arment Dietrich | Founder of Spin Sucks | Creator of the PESO Model?
The job of the communicator has become complicated in the past few years. We live in a world where traditionally trusted organizations like FEMA have to create a website dedicated to dispelling rumors .?
Scholars and journalists have called the era “Post-Truth America ,” which is what we’re dealing with as we traverse the mis-, dis-, and malinformation that affects our organizations.?
How Clorox Handled Distorted Truth
When the Oxford Dictionary defined “post-truth” as circumstances where “objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief,” they weren’t just naming a phenomenon—they were describing our daily reality.
Objective facts are less influential. I just cannot.
The Clorox Company’s experience during the early pandemic offers one of the best examples of how quickly truth can become distorted in our modern information environment.?
In early 2020, they were at the center of an unprecedented crisis. First, Trump’s televised speculation about injecting disinfectants led to a surge of dangerous misinformation about household cleaning products. Within hours, Clorox and other cleaning product manufacturers had to respond rapidly to prevent potential harm to consumers.
But this was just the beginning of their challenges. Demand for disinfectant products skyrocketed because, you know, we wiped down everything before it came into our homes, including boxes and grocery bags. Their sales jumped 500% year-over-year, which created a multi-faceted crisis.?
Their response became a masterclass in modern crisis communication. They:
What made their response particularly effective was their understanding that they weren’t just fighting misinformation—they were racing against time to prevent potential harm to public health. They combined authoritative scientific information with emotional resonance, acknowledging public fears while providing clear, actionable guidance.
Their communication team worked closely with their scientific experts to translate complex chemical safety information into accessible content. They used multiple channels to reach different audiences.
The company also took the unusual step of publicly announcing that it would not be able to meet demand until 2021, choosing radical transparency over optimistic messaging. This decision, while potentially risky from a business perspective, helped build long-term trust with consumers and partners.
It’s Important to Be More than Right
This isn’t an isolated incident. According to the Edelman Trust Barometer , 63% of respondents believe business leaders purposefully mislead people by saying things they know are false. This erosion of trust fundamentally changes every aspect of our work.
Again. I just cannot.
To navigate this landscape effectively, we have to fully understand what we’re dealing with. Information disorders come in three distinct forms—what I like to call the three-headed monster of modern communication.?
First, there’s misinformation. This is false information shared without harmful intent, like when an employee shares an outdated company policy on social media. Then there’s disinformation. This is deliberately created fake news meant to cause harm, such as competitors spreading rumors about a company’s financial stability. Finally, there’s malinformation. This is true information shared out of context to cause harm, like internal emails leaked without proper context.
When dealing with this environment, it’s not enough to simply be right—you need to be right in a way that resonates and spreads.
The cost of getting this wrong is staggering. A study by the Harris Poll found that 52% of companies reported losing revenue due to misinformation, with an average cost of $1.2 million per incident. But this goes far beyond financial losses. Organizations also see decreased employee morale, lost partnerships, reduced customer trust, and increased security risks.
Modern Truth-Based Communications
So, how do we build a modern truth-based communications strategy??
I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this during this election cycle. Even when presented with facts, human beings don’t always care or believe them to be true. We all have biases and opinions, and we seek information supporting those beliefs. So when we are presented with something that goes against our beliefs, even if it is fact-based and true, we don’t always believe it.
This human nature makes our jobs even more challenging, doesn’t it??
It starts with the understanding that we need both proactive and reactive capabilities. It’s up to us to do regular truth audits of all communication channels, establish consistent fact-checking protocols, build strong relationships with authoritative sources, and maintain clear brand positioning on truth and transparency.?
At the same time, we need rapid response teams, pre-approved message templates, established verification processes, and sophisticated media monitoring systems.
How to Prevent Fires Before They Start
So, a truth audit. I know many of you are thinking, “Ug. Really, Gini? One more thing?”
The answer is yes, but they’re not as horrible as they sound. Think of it as spring cleaning for your content, except you’re doing it quarterly because, well, things move fast these days. You need to check everything: that website content you haven’t updated since 2019 (don’t pretend you don’t have any), those social media profiles where your intern got creative with the company description, the images the intern used from the internet without realizing you could get sued for that, and yes, even that media kit you’ve been meaning to update.
Here’s how to make it manageable:
The Fact-Checking Protocol?
You know how someone higher up has wanted to post something RIGHT NOW because it’s “timely,” and suddenly you’re supposed to verify three years’ worth of data in three minutes? I know it’s not just me! This is why you need a system that’s both thorough and fast.?
Create a verification flowchart:
Building Your Source Network
Here’s a fun fact: experts love it when you build relationships with them BEFORE you need them at 11 p.m. on a Friday.?
Start building your network of:
The Reactive Stuff
Now it’s time to build your rapid response team. It should consist of:
And yes, you need backups for all of these people because crises don’t care about vacation schedules.
Create Templates
I know templates can feel like cheating. They’re not. They’re sanity-savers. You should have templates for:
Just remember to actually customize them when you use them. Nothing says “we don’t really care” quite like forgetting to fill in the [INCIDENT DETAILS HERE] placeholder.
Media Monitoring
If you don’t already, set up alerts for:
Set Aside Some Budget
Yes, you do need to have budget. It drives me crazy when execs think our job can be done on completely free tools. Just like anything else in life, you get what you pay for. You should budget for:
Keeping It All Running
With all of that set up and audited, you need to keep things running.
Every month, check your systems, update your templates, make sure your contact list is current,? and have a team meeting to focus solely on correcting mis-, dis-, and malinformation about your company.
Every quarter, do your truth audit, run a crisis drill, and review what’s working and what isn’t.
And once a year, review everything. Figure out what you need to change, justify your budget, and celebrate that you made it another year without a major crisis (or survived the ones you had).
The role of emotional intelligence in truth-based communication cannot be overstated. We’re not just fighting false information—we’re dealing with why people believe and share it.
Resources
This section is dedicated to all our available resources to help make your life easier.
?
Strategic Communications Leader | C-Suite Collaborator | Media Relations | Crisis Communications | Finance Communications | Public Policy | Employee Engagement | Thought Leadership
10 小时前#communications pros, this may be the year's most important post. I bet many organizations aren't close to what Gini Dietrich describes. We should be. #crisiscommunications #crisismanagement
Wholeheartedly concur with this excellent commentary. In fact, back when I was pursuing my master's degree in English, I wrote a paper on the growth of the post truth movement, citing Plato and Foucault. My focus was twenty first century politics, citing an elected official who delved in post truth commentary with resounding regularity. You can access my paper from this link: https://edwardmbury.com/writing-samples/final-engl-507-edward-bury-final-paper/
Great perspective
Strategic Communicator/Professional Writer
1 天前You've really nailed it with the state of "Post-Truth America." I remember being horrified at a lie being referred to as "altered facts." Huh?! I agree that Clorox's quick-thinking and responsiveness to the crazy disinformation was exemplary. Even though I did not ingest Clorox, I relied heavily on those wipes until there weren't any available for a long while (I made my own). Finally, your call to action for both proactive and reactive measures to handle misinformation, disinformation and malinformation is great advice in preventing "fires before they start." Thanks, Gini!
Building programs to connect people to farming & food. Connecting with people, thinking through goals, taking action & empowering others to act!
1 天前Can't help but be reminded not all trolls live under bridges. Some live on platforms like LinkedIn trying to suck in good folks rather than goats.