Approaching BPM vs Case Management
Garth Knudson
Sr. Enterprise Account Executive @ Camunda | Process Orchestration and Automation
Both Business Process Management (BPM) and Case Management solutions entail workflow-driven activities, business rules, forms, data models, document handling, and system integration. They can also use the same infrastructure and overall architecture. As a result, there is some confusion in the marketplace about which product to use and when to streamline and automate specific processes.
Below I try to define each:
BPM
The overarching objective of BPM is to improve operational efficiency and effectiveness. Organizations use BPM Suites to build composite applications that streamline and automate targeted human and system-driven work. Activities are generally defined, but may include ad-hoc interactions and/or dynamic collaboration. Applications combine business rules (e.g., policies, procedures, roles, responsibilities, routing, escalations, deadlines, SLAs), forms (e.g., layouts, data capture, data validations, dynamic questions), data models, content handling, data repositories, system integration, and user interfaces to enable user access and system administration. They also provide visibility into all work-related objects (i.e., activities, data, documents, responses, correspondence) to enable ongoing process improvement, change management, and compliance.
Case Management
The overarching objective of Case Management is to better organize work (i.e., actions, decisions) and associated content (i.e., data, documents, correspondence) to successfully complete a specific business outcome (i.e., settlement in legal investigation, response to service request, payment to claim). Work efficiency and effectiveness are secondary to making the right decision. Work activities are more context-driven. They range from highly defined to completely dynamic based who is asking, why are they asking it, what are they asking for, who can make a decision, and what materials are needed to make the decision. Rules may often change due to new regulation (e.g., tax codes) and market fluctuations (e.g., interest rates). As a result, relationships among work objectives evolve more over time. Work activities may have many discrete options and require intense collaboration. Like BPM, Case Management applications provide visibility into group work and associated content. Content may need to be changed/edited as decisions are made.
Leveraging BPM Suites for Case Management
If you have a BPM Suite, you can use it to design and build both BPM and Case Management applications if it supports both structured (highly defined) and dynamic (unstructured, non-routine, unexpected, situational) work interactions, the attachment of various content types (i.e., structured data such as name and date of birth, unstructured data such as scanned documents and video files), and commentary/collaboration amongst users. Often BPM Suites need to be integrated with EDMS to support version control of documents.
Platform Director
10 年Case is static; process is dynamic. Case need goals, intend, resolution; process needs optimization, re-engineering, improvement. Case has multiple possible endings; process starts from point A and ends in point B. Case does not need repetition; process is designed for repetition. Cases are very popular with Law, Liability, Legality, Finance and Health. Process is native to manufacturing, assembly and production lines. Process can connect different workflow steps but the process is not designed to connect different cases. In general processes can be part of almost any use case. In this sense cases have their internal processes. Case supersedes process.
Enterprise/Solution Architect: Integration, Governance, Digital Transformation, Services, Security
10 年Fully agree with Max J. Pucher
Founder na Innovate Your Daily Work IDW?
10 年BPM is a branding of other peoples work, and is rather thin compared to them. Frank Gilbreth invented many of the charts in the 1920's, Shewhart Deming and Juran's work from which it was gleaned is much deeper and has a better track record... And hey did not brand their work. But as partisl versions of their work go it is better than most. A bit like industrial engineering lite, with nifty acronyms. Sorry to be blunt.
An engine behind fractalmodel.org
10 年Are BPM tools particularly suited for non-case management?
CEO, Co-founder @ Profluo
10 年Garth, BPM tools are not best suited for case management for two particular reasons that come to my mind right now: 1) BPM data usually has a lifetime equal to that of the process instance they were created in (hence your comment on need to integrate with ECM platforms) and the visibility is usually only to the predefined process lanes (roles), thus making it difficult to share and cooperate as needed in case management scenarios; 2) Case Management requires the creation of truly ad-hoc new tasks (and follow-up tasks) at runtime, which is difficult to model within BPMS. There are attempts with ad-hoc tasks in BPMN 2.0 but I have not seen success stories with 2.0 compliant tools. On the other hand, I don't think replacing BPM consultant hordes with CM consultant hordes is for the benefit of customers. It's just another vendor semantic fight, so that they can debate again in 5 years why neither BPM or CM did not take off as expected. Anyone arguing BPM vs CM is missing the whole point that an enterprise needs both in order to achieve its business goals. A wise combination of both approaches will yield the best results.