More About Business Model Disruption
Geoffrey Moore
Author, speaker, advisor, best known for Crossing the Chasm, Zone to Win and The Infinite Staircase. Board Member of nLight, WorkFusion, and Phaidra. Chairman Emeritus Chasm Group & Chasm Institute.
In a recent post I talked about the distinction between disrupting your operating model versus disrupting your business model. I made two claims then which I hold even more strongly now:
- It is a good thing to disrupt your operating model whenever next-generation technology can help you unlock trapped value in outmoded business processes.
- It is a bad thing to disrupt your business model, even when your sector is under direct attack by a new entrant who is doing just that and eating your lunch!
The first of these two changes can contain some bitter medicine that gives you grief and certainly entails execution risk, but at the end of the day it makes you a better, stronger company. The second is simply toxic. Here’s why.
All established enterprises leverage their ecosystem of partners to complete their whole product and amplify their market reach. The net result is a micro-economy in which each company helps create opportunity and value for every other company in the mix. Bad actors are evicted, of course, but the value chain itself and the roles it entails abide. This is what makes economic returns both forecastable and profitable.
Changing a business model mounts a direct attack on this ecosystem. The new model is, by definition, not the old one, hence it does not incarnate the old value chain. Instead it instantiates a new one, one that has fundamental advantages that are highly compelling. Often these are achieved by marginalizing or eliminating one or more roles in the old value chain. Sometimes the change involves reimagining how value is created altogether, calling a radically different kind of ecosystem into existence, with heretofore unheard of roles. Maybe you can survive the change—but there is zero chance you can do so and maintain your current ecosystem intact.
So what? Well, it turns out that most of your company power is invested in that ecosystem. Without it, frankly, your value to your customer base is much less than you might be assuming. Even if you keep your customers from churning, you will find yourself having to field service requests that never used to come to you. And at the same time, you will be asked to perform with excellence against the standards of the new model, standards you did not invent, are not familiar with, and probably lack the talent to execute productively.
The key point here is that business, regardless of sector or vertical industry, is much more of a team sport than we normally acknowledge. Established enterprises benefit from this every single day. Business consultants who thrive on advocating embracing business model disruption are staggeringly na?ve. To be sure, the disrupters are getting huge leverage out of the new model—that is their source of strategic advantage. But there is nothing here for an established enterprise to grab hold of without sacrificing its own crown jewels.
That’s what I think. What do you think?
_________________________________________________________________________
Geoffrey Moore | Zone to Win Book | Geoffrey Moore Twitter | Geoffrey Moore YouTube
Image: Pling/Shutterstock
CXO | PRIVATE COMPANY BOARD DIRECTOR & BOARD ADVISOR | DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION | OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENT | PROFITABLE GROWTH | SAAS | LIFE SCIENCES | MANUFACTURING | AUTHOR | SPEAKER
8 年Geoffrey, I'm a follower and I liked the article although I must disagree. IMHO, the operating model is what drives the transactional side of the business (how you charge for your product or service) and the business model is how you deliver the value. Disruption, I believe, comes when you change the business model and not the operating model. Uber is a great example. Car, driver, passenger, but there are entities taken out of the ecosystem (government - taxi medallions, and the taxi company) in delivering the value.
Inspiring Passion & Success, CEO, 4X Start-up Founder/Leader, Board Director, Strategy, Innovation, Sustainability, Change Management, IoT, Consulting, Author "Xponential Growth".
8 年This is a bit outdated view. Yes to support existing business models AND create a new in parallel to be able to transition to the new in the future.
Head of Retail - MBA ★ Marketing Strategy ★ Business Psychology ★ Sales Revenue ★ Regional turnaround Solutions for FMCG , CPG
8 年Business model is the core DNA, changing it to fit the market conditions or to face a new entrant is detrimental.
crenger.com owner
9 年Geoffrey, Disruption does not start from top to down. Quite the contrary. My analysis of the current situation in water industry tells that the majority of engineering companies are riding obsolete rigid business models inherited from 80's. They do not understand what ecosystem means. I agree with you in only one point. True disruption cannot be peacefully merged with existing decaying business. It's not worth reanimating it.
Global Business Executive │ Digital Transformation │ M&A Integration | Product Management │ Business Operations | P&L
9 年Yes, that is absolutely true, changing operating model to continually experimentt and improve the execution is desirable as long as some thought to consequences and impact to team are understood. Changing business models involves changing ecosystem (suppliers, partners and alliances), operating model, possibly products. Business models shouldn't be the first things you should attempt to change unless you are the one disrupting the business model since you see more value in the new ecosystem than in the one you are currently using? Possibly because your company occupies a lower position in the pecking order and this disruption will set things right