3 Reasons Why E-Money Stalls in Indonesia

Whatever happened to e-money in Indonesia? The field seemed so promising but the numerous attempts by startups, big telcos, and even bigger banks met no major success. After years of trying, we have a handful of closed-loop card based transactions to pay for toll roads, bus fare, or ticket to the movies, but not much else. The market will likely stay small and fragmented if these three issues are not resolved:

1. Trust

It’s amazing how all those brilliant minds in banks and telcos ignore this basic building block when it comes to customer relationships. The lack of trust Indonesians have for their mobile operators and financial institutions is reflected in high churn rates and low NPS scores. The reasons are numerous (selling customer’s private numbers to advertisers, hidden service charges) yet companies continue to prioritise user acquisition (via short term campaigns) over the long term goal of profit optimisation (via improving recommendation scores).

Be honest, be reliable, keep confidences: if you can’t provide these for your customers, how can you expect them to trust you with their money?

Being honest, being reliable, keeping confidences: without these, your customers won’t trust you with money, virtual or otherwise (tweet this)

2. Cash Complimentary

Don’t expect e-money to replace cash. Rather, expect e-money to compliment cash.

Like many developing economies, Indonesia is a cash-based economy. Deal with MSMEs (which comprise 97% of businesses in Indonesia) and they will most likely insist on cash payments. The act of converting e-money to cash needs to take no effort at all, otherwise people would just avoid e-money altogether. Telcos may force their employees to take part of their salary in e-money format, but it won’t motivate increased usage. Of the varieties of human activities one conducts in Indonesia, the majority requires one to simply have cash in hand.

When it comes to cashing out virtual currency, current regulations favours the top four banks. But the four top banks are mostly focused on urban areas. How about the other half of the population?

Don’t expect e-money to replace cash. Rather, expect e-money to compliment cash. (tweet this)

3. The Rural Early Adopters

The prevailing rhetoric around e-money refers to how the technology could address the challenge of getting unbanked Indonesians (up to 80% of the population) into the financial system. But what’s the reality?

Current efforts are biased to capturing urban early adopters. The technology being developed and the benefits being communicated reflect an effort to address Rogers’ Five Factors for Diffusion of Innovation, but they exclusively address the urban segment of the population.

No one uses technology for the sake of using technology. Except maybe technologists.

This urban bias is the unintentional result of asking the wrong questions when studying the market. Thus, the industry base its decisions on reports that state such things as, “the market is interested in adopting m-banking services because it saves time.” If time savings is really the number one advantage m-banking has over its alternatives, then it is more relevant for those who experience time poverty. That’s something that matters more for someone who has to deal with Jakarta’s heavy traffic everyday than someone living in rural Sukabumi or Wonosobo.

To be successful, e-money and m-banking need to be aimed at Rural Early Adopters, not just their urban brethren.

E-money needs to be aimed at Rural Early Adopters, not just their urban brethren. (tweet this)

The three issues addressed above are fundamental issues that are easy to spot but complex to address. Whether it would be the government, private sector, or academics who take the first step, the answer starts with getting a better, more meaningful understanding of the Indonesian people.

image courtesy MEMANG RIZALIS ENT.

** Find MORE useful trends **

If you found this post useful, try this:

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ghani Kunto的更多文章

  • Why do leaders overcorrect?

    Why do leaders overcorrect?

    Strange that overcorrection still happen, when the prescription to avoid it is pretty standard: Analyse root cause…

    1 条评论
  • Startups and Misplaced Aspirations

    Startups and Misplaced Aspirations

    Not too long ago, the youth of Indonesia aspired to be civil servants. Then we aspired to work in big…

    1 条评论
  • Menggunakan Instagram Untuk Pemasaran

    Menggunakan Instagram Untuk Pemasaran

    KATA ORANG, INSTAGRAM ITU … “Buat selfie doang kan?” “Cocoknya untuk brand yang jualan barang. Gak cocoklah untuk brand…

    4 条评论
  • 3 Principles of Mobile Digital Marketing in Indonesia

    3 Principles of Mobile Digital Marketing in Indonesia

    Oh, yes, we marketers have such penchant for drama and hyperbole. Like naming Google’s latest algorithm update…

    2 条评论
  • Navigating Indonesia’s New Marketing Landscape

    Navigating Indonesia’s New Marketing Landscape

    The investment board gave you positive economic indicators. The chamber of commerce connected you with local partners.

    5 条评论
  • Brands and Fans: an ongoing case study

    Brands and Fans: an ongoing case study

    DC Comic’s Convergence event is an interesting look at how companies try to interact with their fans and fandom. My 2…

  • Online Influencers: A Caveat

    Online Influencers: A Caveat

    So, you’ve started marketing using online influencers? Congrats! Hopefully you’re using online influencers for the…

    2 条评论
  • Technology and Innovation – The Future of Banking

    Technology and Innovation – The Future of Banking

    Last week I was invited as one of the panel speakers in the Innovation Leaders Panel in FST Media’s 2nd Annual…

    16 条评论
  • The Biggest Challenge Facing Service Providers Like Telkomsel and Indosat

    The Biggest Challenge Facing Service Providers Like Telkomsel and Indosat

    Today there are 280 million active cellphone numbers in Indonesia, with one out of four of them a smartphone…

  • Top 5 Trends in Consumer Banking in Indonesia

    Top 5 Trends in Consumer Banking in Indonesia

    The reason that 80% of the Indonesians still have no bank account is not lack of access. The reason is lack of relevant…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了