5 Smart Reasons Employers Should Stop Hiring for Full-time Jobs

I'd like to believe the last couple of years have taught us the idea of building careers around being a long-term, full-time employee is short-sighted. Many articles have been written around the new reality that EVERY job is temporary. As professionals, we are wising up to the fact we're all businesses-of-one who need to start taking a more proactive approach to marketing our skills in order to stay relevant and employable for the duration of our careers.

But, What About Employers?!

Part of the reason we continue to see a high level of unemployment, underemployment and job dissatisfaction is employers. Many aren't ready to openly state the future success of their businesses will be directly dependent upon their ability to be agile with their workforce. Companies will need to shift gears and eliminate staff on a day's notice in order to stay competitive. This is not something easily transitioned to because we've spent the last 50 years telling everyone they are assets to the company and members of the corporate family. However, those days are gone. The sooner employers shift towards a more transparent approach, the better it is for all those employees who need to learn how to adapt.

5 Reasons to Eliminate Full-time Jobs

In the new book, "The Alliance," LinkedIn founder, Reid Hoffman and his co-authors, entrepreneurs Ben Casnocha and Chris Yeh, encourage employers to create "tours of duty" instead of jobs. This helps the employee understand they are being hired to complete a project as opposed to being hired into a secure role that will go on indefinitely. The authors believe the management of expectations can help to restore the current dysfunctional relationship between employees and their employers. It's a bold idea and there are definitely concerns that pop into my head with the verbiage. (Do I want to feel like I'm in battle when I work? The 'tour of duty' military reference creates some concern.) But, their concepts effectively speak to the need to fairly and honestly re-define the partnership between businesses (employers) and the businesses-of-one (employees) who serve them.

For all the companies out there who are still trying to tell us they have full-time jobs that will last for decades, here are five reasons you should stop the insanity:

1) You'll get better talent. The best talent constantly want to change and improve. They don't like the idea of being stuck in a job/company for decades. They can handle the shorter-term commitment a 'tour of duty' provides.

2) New hires won't slack after on-boarding. If new employees know they may need to look for a new gig if they aren't asked to stay on for another project, they'll want to really do their best. Everyone knows it is easier to stay with an employer than seek a new one. The employment duration keeps the employee's head in the game.

3) Your alumni network will grow. More people will come in and out of your company, but they won't leave angry. When done right, they'll stay in touch and may even return one day, bringing some new skills they acquired while working on other short-term projects at other companies.

4) You can change a person's job guilt-free. It's much easier to say, "we need you to do this now," if an employee understands from the get-to the job they hired wasn't permanent. Especially, if the job change means they might learn a new skill set or get an extension on the time in the role.

5) You can stop calling your talent reorganizations, "layoffs." When people can't be re-deployed in your organization, you won't have to call it a layoff. Instead, you can say that there just wasn't a new assignment that was a match for their talents. Sounds so much better, doesn't it?

The above are all outlined in greater detail in the book, "The Alliance." It's definitely worth reading. I think it's the first book in what will be a trend of game-changing concepts designed to help companies finally shift their thinking in the area of talent management.

If you want to read more of what I've written, check out my articles on Inc.com.

Photo: Shutterstock

************

Hey, have we met before?! If this is your first time reading my posts on LinkedIn, thanks for stopping by! If you liked what you read, will you follow me here? I write weekly on all topics related to careers. Also, I'd be truly grateful if you'd share my work with your LinkedIn network - let's help more people take control of their careers!

Some other posts I've written:

Want to work with me & my team on your career? Check out CareerHMO - the cure for chronic career pain and sign-up for one of our our free career resources!


<<< PS - This is the book I wrote to help people find career satisfaction.

How to connect with me on LinkedIn: I am open to connecting with anyone who sends me a customized request to connect (i.e. tell me what article you read, why you want to connect, etc.).

CAUTION: If your connection request asks me to review your resume or profile, I won't accept it. I currently don't have the bandwidth to do that for everyone, so if you are looking for help, check out the free resources I offer on my site, CareerHMO.com instead — it will help!

Joshua Carter

Current employee of Comcast

1 年

This is a terrible idea among a plethora of other equally terrible ideas. The relationship between employer and employee is dysfunctional because expectations don’t line up with compensation. This race to the bottom will result in a long term loss of productivity and employee satisfaction. Why would anyone give 100% much less go above and beyond when they understand from the word go that their position is precarious and indeterminate? What reason would they have not to spend all of their time, on the clock and off, just looking for another job? Labor has been in a position of weakness relative to employers for decades and this is the end result. We’re literally being treated like playing cards to be traded away and reshuffled at a moments notice. Unacceptable. And extremely shortsighted.

回复
Carrie A Balberg

Office Administration Support ?????

4 年

Don't hire fulltime with benefits and you get more and more people without health insurance! How stupid is that? No moral regard.

回复
Charles Neal

English Tutor at Tutor.com

7 年

Here's an idea. STOP TREATING EMPLOYEES LIKE GARBAGE AND PAY PEOPLE WHAT YOU OWE THEM YOU BAND OF THIEVES.

Thomas Lawrence MD, MBA

CEO & Founder at Population Health Strategic Solutions

7 年

Sounds like an attempt to make a silk purse out of a sows ear. Seems to me like this could just be another corporate cost cutting measure saving benefits and pension expenses for the corporation. Great employees will stay with great companies and great employees will leave average companies without the temporary project based approach.

Zach Besheer MHA, FACHE

Area Vice President at Gallagher - Employee Benefits

7 年

Great thoughts J.T. O'Donnell. This is the reason our interim hospital leadership practice continues to grow so rapidly. When an organization needs 'over qualified" talent to lead a short term project or serve in a vacancy for six to twelve months, a temporary executive is the best solution.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了