Innovation Now or Later?

Have you ever had two seemingly unrelated things happen around the same time and each in some way produced an insight into the other? Well it happened to me recently.

A bright and ebullient student came to visit me at my innovation lab seeking some career advice for a creative person soon to be in possession of an MBA from a top flight school. She had been offered the standard issue brand manager position at a humongous packaged goods conglomerate as well as a promising gig at a nameplate consulting firm back east.

When I asked what she wanted from a career her crisp reply was simply “to be happy.” I pressed as to what exactly brought her happiness. With a chagrined smile she simply said, “I want to be a writer.” Fair enough, “why don’t you just start writing your novel now?” I asked. “Because I know it would take years to become a successful author and I want to be happy now.” And there it was: the tradeoff of getting a little of what we want now or a lot of what we want later.

The following day I had a meeting with an executive of a venerable multinational corporation to discuss potential innovation strategies that would move his stock price up. He liked my unique approach for synchronizing the scope and scale of his massive enterprise to provide complex solutions that were well beyond the reach of rivals and upstarts. What he didn’t like was the three year timeline I estimated it would take to successfully maneuver into position. And there it was again: the tradeoff of getting a little of what we want now or a lot of what we want later.

And then it clicked. Innovation is lot like happiness. Neither the student nor the executive were willing to invest the necessary time, our most precious currency, to achieve the return that they genuinely sought – personal happiness and professional innovation. Too much happiness today, happy hours and retail therapy for example, brings too little tomorrow. Conversely, if you pay everything forward there is little left in the till to meet the obligations of today. As with most maneuvers, balance is way of the wise.

Here’s the rub: we live in an instant world – coffee, ATMs and movies on demand – but following your bliss or making innovation happen requires that you’ve run enough experiments and have gained enough experience to not only master your disposition and your trade but to exceed it. Both happiness and innovation require trudging through the ordinary to reach the extraordinary. The way is long and the tolls are high. That’s why most turn back and take the convenient job or the follow the industry leaders.

There are two forms of time most relevant to the human experience:

  1. Chronological time which can be maximized via the efficient sequential organization of tasks. This form can be seen in every productivity app on your smart phone.
  2. Developmental time which resists compression because it must be fully experienced as it naturally unfolds. This form becomes self evident when you learn a new language or acquire a new skill.

Chronological time, our authoritarian task master, has so thoroughly dominated our lives that we scarcely have a moment to think beyond the daily checklist. This lack of soak time not only cheats us of the intervals in which we produce happiness and creativity but also alters our sense of perspective. If the eternal present is all that there is, what hope is there for the future where we make our world better for those who follow?

With apologies to enlightened beings everywhere, the power of now is not just contemplative and appreciative but also progressive. Put another way, now is not just where we end but rather where we start. Mindfulness of our happiness is not an invitation to accepting our lives as they are now but rather a call to creating the lives we seek experience some time hence. Happiness and innovation are investments. We may forgo the pleasures of today for the satisfaction that our discipline may bring tomorrow.

So the next time you want to be happy, or to create something marvelously new, ask yourself when you really need it and when it is most likely to happen. Managing our own expectations of time gives us the power and purpose to realize our more lofty ambitions.

Who knows, you might even become an author or raise the price of your stock.

# # #

***NEW eBook*** MAKING STONE SOUP: HOW TO JUMPSTART INNOVATION TEAMS is a short, fun and to the point guide for anyone launching an innovation team, leading a creative project, or developing a novel solution. It is available now on Amazon and iTunes. For more information visit www.jeffdegraff.com.

JEFF DEGRAFF is a professor, author, speaker and advisor to hundreds of the top organizations in the world. He is called the Dean of Innovation because of his influence on the field. You can follow Jeff on Twitter @JeffDeGraff and LinkedIn.

Jay Cantrell

President - Innovus Enterprises Inc ----------------- Technology Innovation

10 年

Many companies have replaced innovation with incrementalism for the sake of time (think of the cases in "The Innovator's Dilemma" for example). After all the stockholders really only have patience for results next quarter.

回复
Nishikanta Nayak

Results-Driven Seasoned Professional Ready for Immediate Challenges | Industry Practitioner. IIM Indore.

10 年

Its there already, thought has been transferred to migration, required to introspect and 100% sincerity require to get it done

回复
Bud Taylor

Executive Advisor | Global Management Consultant | Author - Customer Driven Change | Speaker - Change & Innovation

10 年

Corporate structures have been stripped of costs and along with it the mavericks and time needed for ideas to soak. Increasingly Innovation is being done on the run by the wrong people to catch markets they don't understand. Makes lots of room for consultants!

回复
Daedrea Osbourne

Graphic Designer | Customer Service Representative

10 年

True. I do tend to compensate for wanting to work on a project that is easier and faster to start where the rewards would be in my pocket alot faster over the idea that will take time and tons of money. Although I've reasoned with myself that the faster option will most likely benefit the other in terms of raising funds. This also apples to some of my life decisions. Once my mind gets set on something I want now , I tend to do everything that will get me what I want faster that usually involves negotiating. The hard work as I see it to attempt to get that thing faster always tends to override the longer option. The faster way always has its benefits in terms of happiness but it really depends if the faster way is actually working. Because if the faster way ends up taking a while, it no longer becomes the faster way but makes the longer way somehow missed in thinking now that maybe the longer way would have been the better choice, ironically the shorter choice. But then now time is gone and the faster way will always seem more appealing to the longer way as the longer way is always alot more added time. I've learnt from my own recent mistakes that maybe attempting both ways would have been a decent medium. While attempting the fast way, do it the longer way as a back up and whichever leads you faster to your goal then go with one or the other, but who I am to say that. Maybe if I try the medium attempt, it ends up feeling incomplete on both ways. Only time will tell. Great article. Made me think. I love the ones that do :)

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了