How to Save Lives with Advertising

Last year, we all fell in love with a cheeky public service campaign called Dumb Ways to Die. Intended to promote greater pedestrian safety on the Melbourne Metro, it featured a music video that listed stupid ways you could die. They included eating superglue, inviting a serial killer into your home, and selling both your kidneys. At the end, the video said that perhaps the dumbest way to die of all is to get hit by a train.

The video went as viral as the flu. Viewed more than 70 million times, it was declared by many the most successful public service campaign in advertising history. Dumb Ways to Die eventually won two Webbys and the Grand Prix at Cannes, among countless lesser awards.

But did it work? The simple answer is ‘of course.’ As its agency pointed out, it not only won awards, it also generated $50 million in global advertising value. Ok, but did it work?

Let’s think about that for a moment. What the Metro was trying to achieve? It wanted to save lives, and we can track that. The Metro measures safety by something called “near misses at level crossings.” Two and half months after the campaign’s launch, it reported that such incidents had dropped 30%. That sounds great. Unfortunately, it’s also meaningless. The Metro only reports 13 or 14 or so near misses every month on average. That means some months you get 10, others 17. If you simply look at two months’ time, a 30% reduction is not out of the ordinary.

Instead, you have to see how the campaign worked long term. Here things don’t look so rosy. Over the first six months of 2013, the positive trend reversed. Near misses during that time actually increased 14% over the previous year. Given that PSAs tend to sunset after six months or so, the campaign probably didn’t work for the Metro at all.

Let’s not rush to blame anyone. PSA’s can save lives in the right context. In 2011, for example, Britons saw a hilarious PSA starring movie tough guy Vinny Jones. It taught people that they could save the life of cardiac arrest victims simply by pushing hard and fast on their chests to the beat of the BeeGee’s “Staying Alive.” That simple, easy-to-remember tip has saved at least 28 lives since the release of the ad—and probably many more.

So how can you save lives with marketing? Let’s see.

  1. Set campaign goals that make sense. If you want to know why the Metro had trouble saving lives with a PSA, don’t blame the PSA. The main problem is that there were not many lives to save in the first place. Getting hit by public transit is not just a dumb way to die, it’s also a rare one. For example, from 2001 to 2012 the New York City Subway saw 134 people hit by trains and 41 killed each year on average. 35% of them were suicides. If that sounds bad, you have to remember the scale of the system. The subway logs 1.71 billion rides per year. That means your chances of accidentally getting killed that way on any given ride are about 1 in 64 million. While every life is worth saving, this is not exactly low hanging fruit.

    The Vinny Jones ad? Completely different story. Hands-only CPR can save the lives of cardiac arrest victims. In Britain, where CPR is not widely taught, your chance of surviving cardiac arrest is about 20%. In Seattle, where half the people know CPR, that rises to 50%. That big gap goes a long way to explaining why Vinny Jones worked.

  2. Align on your goals. You need to make sure the agency and the client, or whomever you’re working with, agree on the purpose of the effort. It’s not clear that the Metro and its agency agreed on the goals at all. They may have, but the effort certainly benefitted one more than the other.

  3. Choose tactics that move those metrics. The brilliance of the Vinny Jones spot lies in how it integrates its story with its purpose. “Staying Alive” not only provides the correct cadence for hand-only CPR, it’s literally what you’re trying to do.

  4. Measure and learn. By the numbers, Dumb Ways to Die didn’t work for the Metro, but we can still learn from it. For example, we now know that even the best PSA in history will not solve that kind of problem. We also know that in other contexts a music video like this can get a huge audience.

You might argue that I’m being a little unfair and that the true measure of the video should be how it improved safety worldwide, since it went so viral. I have to confess, I’m more client-focused than that. The Melbourne Metro paid for the campaign; their system should have benefitted. Then again, 2013 also saw more people hit by New York subway trains than in 2012.

I’d love to hear what you think.

This article is an excerpt from Does It Work, an upcoming book by Shane Atchison and Jason Burby. We welcome your comments.

You can follow Shane on Twitter here and follow Jason on Twitter here.

Photo: Melbourne Metro Trains

Andrew DeNeen

Senior Design Engineer

10 年

PSA's are great. The hardest part of this equation is getting people to care. If a person is engaged in the activity or cares about the issue there is a much better chance of receptivity and action. Moving someone from not caring about something to a place of concern and action is a formidable challenge.

回复
Jonathan Patton Sr.

Freight Broker at ARD RAPID DELIVERY LOGISTICS CORP

10 年

Here's one way get them moving --- let me know what u think of this --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBRKhcVMgtU

回复
Tony Low

Just a designer trying to design good experience

10 年

I must agree, yes, the campaign got viral and we see people all around the world singing along and playing the game even at this end of the world where METRO is known for something else and not the train service. But the fact that the numbers are not so great after the campaign, we can't really say that it has failed but should look at what's it set for to achieve in the beginning. I believe this is to be set in the very beginning of a brief. I'm a true believer that design should not just be what it looks, feels like, design should be about how things work. Maybe agency should look at other ways now to solve a brief rather than just looking at channels or media, maybe the best way to solve the metro issue is to design a system that works better for modern commuters or maybe it's just as simple as redesigning the way people queue while waiting for train. Design can be just more than what we see online, what we experience on our touch screen mobile devices. Design is the way of life, the way things work and the way story is being told not just entertaining but efficiently. But sadly... in reality, most of us are just blinded by numbers (be it result or revenue).

回复

Great article, using two really strong examples. It's possible that the real aim for Metro was increased brand affinity, under the guise of saving lives. If this is the case it's a kind of greenwashing, but a very well done one. Maybe that's a cynical approach though. Oh, and, I'm not sure a D&AD Black Pencil counts as a 'lesser' award, but I would say that...

回复

I saw some kids playing football by the side of the road and one of them rushed into the road to retrieve the ball. His friends sang a chorus of "dumb ways to die" as the poor lad looked very sheepish. So did it work for Metro? Probably not, but it has had an impact on public safety on a much bigger scale than they intended. In commercial marketing, the popular ads with Joan Collins/Leonard Rossiter for Campari had a huge uplift in the sales of Martini, because Martini was the market leader. Poor targeting and measurement may be OK for public safety campaigns but it's disastrous for brands!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了