What Would Michael Lewis Do? Let’s Ask Him

The language of finance is complicated, and sometimes intentionally so. From the “turgid dialect” of Fedspeak to the intentionally tortured and complicated mouse print disclaimers on investment prospectuses, the industry embraces verbosity.

So when a New York Times best-selling author appears on 60 Minutes to declare that the stock market is “rigged,” it stands in stark contrast to the usual hedging, sidestepping and equivocating.

Michael Lewis’s latest fete of fast-paced storytelling, “Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt,” centers on one of the industry’s technological advances: high-frequency trading (HFT), which is responsible for more than half the trades that occur in the stock market every day.

Plenty of industry experts and insiders contend that Lewis’s tale is an overly simplistic take on an entangled corner of the market. In an attempt to make the story of hundreds of thousands of “robot computers” buying and selling stock compelling for a broad audience, nuance is lost. They argue it’s not clear if Lewis’s heroes, villains and victims are universally acknowledged.

But the complexity of the system and its network of participants is the point. As Lewis himself said in recent interviews, if it’s so complicated that the average person can’t understand it, then how can they think to ask any questions about it? How do they know which side of the story they fall on?

It’s the same argument that was made in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis—the loan language was so opaque that people didn’t understand what they were signing. And it’s the same problem investors have faced when trying to find an appropriate financial professional to guide them.

For those brave enough to peek behind the curtain, or dive into the dark pool as it were, Lewis has provided more than just cocktail chatter. He has brought to light systemic issues in the financial industry, where trust and transparency—core to every other customer-centric business on the planet—are routinely sidelined for even the suggestion of greater profit.

“Flash Boys” speaks to the broader issues of how the industry uses technology to gain competitive edge. There’s nothing illegal about HFT firms utilizing speed to process and act on information that’s available to everyone. Their “edge” creates theoretical efficiency, but more practically, it generates profits for the traders. But it also has enormous, unprecedented power to move markets, as demonstrated by the Flash Crash of 2010.

If HFTs went away tomorrow, some other disruptor would come in to take their place. While the SEC and the FBI and the New York State Attorney General jostle to solve these issues through new rules and regulations, which are likely to create another slew of rules and loopholes, the rest of us should embark on a conversation about the fundamental utility of the market. We should have an honest debate about what it means to level the playing field, and is it possible to restore confidence.

On Wednesday, May 21, I have the opportunity to sit down for a conversation with Michael Lewis at HighTower Apex, our first-ever industry-wide conference. While I can’t promise we’ll revolutionize the financial industry during our time together, I can guarantee that we will tackle the tough issues in as candid and straightforward a manner as possible.

I invite you to leave your questions for Mr. Lewis in the comments. Let’s put innovation into action—starting now.

Photo: Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick/Getty Images

Nicholas Koeck

General Manager at Quiz Worx Inc

10 年

Question for Mr. Lewis: Your books have focused on so many different topics (sports, politics, the mortgage crisis, technology, HFT, etc) and yet they have struck a chord with people all over the world and you've developed your own following - why do you think your books have been so successful?

回复
Toby LaVigne

YPO | Guide and Outfitter for Freedom - Executive coach specializing in Industrial Exec Leadership Development and next-gen professional development (A-Players)

10 年

I agree that the more rules we layer on...the worse it gets for the non insiders, and counterintuitively the better it gets for the folks we're trying to reign in. Obamacare is a great example...a number of very well equipped (lawyers and money) firms will earn massive profits exploiting the complexity of the bill under the auspices of 'helping' the market...which they may or may not do depending. Is it too simple to think that we could make a massive dent by simplifying the tax code? What if long term capital gains was stepped to disincentive quick profit? What if hedgefund managers and private equity managers could not claim long term cap gains treatment for their often 'zero basis' shares? What if we went to a flat sales tax and scrapped ALL the loopholes? How on earth can even a well meaning CEO of a public company 'do the right thing' when the rules of the game clearly are counter to human, financial and environmental health and sustainability? Oh, and one more huge move - is it too much to ask that we take our government back from corporations? Get rid of all the special interests so that politicians can actually serve the greater good? Corporations are humans and humans are hiding behind their supposed responsibility to the non human corporate entity...the result is inhumane behavior.

回复
Anil Mascarenhas

Executive Vice President Communications at 360 ONE

10 年

Speed is the key and technology ensures that distance does not make the trade go wander. If restrictions are done on the servers, hypothetically, wouldn’t that lead to a flare up in real estate prices for those seeking physical proximity to the exchanges. And then do you expect curbs on who can buy/lease how much around the exchanges?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Elliot S. Weissbluth的更多文章

  • Inspiring Discussions at the Crossroads of Health and Wealth: Apex 2017

    Inspiring Discussions at the Crossroads of Health and Wealth: Apex 2017

    At HighTower, we are firm believers that financial success is not an end-goal in and of itself, but rather a catalyst…

    4 条评论
  • The Three Places I Go to Focus

    The Three Places I Go to Focus

    Escaping from distraction is critical—and increasingly difficult in our hyper-connected world. In a recent post for…

    8 条评论
  • A Transformational Transaction: HighTower Acquires WealthTrust

    A Transformational Transaction: HighTower Acquires WealthTrust

    We are very proud to welcome WealthTrust to the HighTower community. The transaction is the largest in HighTower’s…

  • The Smart Stranger, Part 2: The Power of Outsiders

    The Smart Stranger, Part 2: The Power of Outsiders

    “What can the story of an outsider tell us about spurring innovation?” asks this New York Times video, featuring…

    18 条评论
  • Walking backward from the future

    Walking backward from the future

    In this series, professionals discuss their experiences accomplishing something for the first time. Read their stories…

    5 条评论
  • The Profitability Milestone

    The Profitability Milestone

    For the first few years at HighTower, every month I would dread the call with my CFO to see how much money we lost that…

    15 条评论
  • An #OpenLetter to Executives Who Think Business is Like Sports

    An #OpenLetter to Executives Who Think Business is Like Sports

    Dear fellow CEOs, Business is not a game. We’ve said it before.

    61 条评论
  • The Big Letdown…and the Big Break

    The Big Letdown…and the Big Break

    During HighTower’s startup days, while frantically raising capital to launch, we ran around New York in back-to-back…

    10 条评论
  • Do The Scary Stuff

    Do The Scary Stuff

    “Do the uncomfortable.” This advice came from my mentor at my first “career” job—the man who taught me to be a lawyer.

    15 条评论
  • #MyIdealWorkplace: The Crossroads of Achievement and Fulfillment

    #MyIdealWorkplace: The Crossroads of Achievement and Fulfillment

    My friend Tony Robbins says, “Success without fulfillment is the ultimate failure.” That to live an extraordinary life,…

    37 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了