E-Cigarettes and FDA Regulation: What message does regulation have?
Colin Shaw
LinkedIn 'Top Voice' & influencer Customer Experience & Marketing | Financial Times Award Leading Consultancy 4 Straight Years | Host of 'The Intuitive Customer' in Top 2% | Best-selling Author x 7 | Conference Speaker
"Would you like smoking or non-smoking?"
This was the question that any patron was greeted with for several years when they went to a restaurant. But since the ban of smoking in most public places around many countries country since, the question is as obsolete as the ash trays stashed in a box in the musty back room closet of the restaurant.
Back in the day, I used to go into smoke-filled bars and come home with clothes smelling like smoke. If you had said to me then that smoking would be banned and be seen as “socially unacceptable”, I would have laughed at your naiveté.
But you would have been right and I for one would now be glad that I was wrong back then. Now we finally get a clear atmosphere when we are out. When I go to drinks or dinner, I no longer have to air out my jacket and suit to help minimize the pungent odor of my fellow patrons’ cigarettes.
But the growing popularity of E-Cigarettes, an electronic vaporizer that delivers nicotine to the user that has grown into a $2 Billion business annually, has prompted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to initiate regulation of the devices. Using them is called, “vaping.” Will vaping and it’s regulation by the FDA revive the query at hostess stands across the country once again? I for one, hope not.
What Will the FDA Regulations Cover?
This move is big news. Here's an overview on the issue from ABC News:
According to Bloomberg.com, the tobacco industry welcomes the move by the FDA. They believe that this regulation is a good thing for their product. In an article by Bloomberg reporter Anna Edney that really spells out the whole story around the issue, Miguel Martin, president of the E-Cigarette maker Logic said, “This is not a sort of trenched-in, battlefield mentality. We want to work with the FDA.”
What Does Regulation Mean to the Average Person?
I find the fact that the E-Cigarette leaders support the FDA regulation particularly interesting. It seems that most capitalistic industries would not be keen to be regulated by a government agency. But the E-Cigarette makers are. This indicates to me that they may see regulation as a pro not a con for them. I can’t speak for the industry representatives, but my feeling is that if the FDA regulates the product, it could be seen that it approves of their use as opposed to just saying they are safe to use.
There is a fine line here. Subconsciously some citizens will then assume that if the FDA is regulating them, then E-Cigarettes are OK to use. But the truth is that we don’t really know the long-term effects of the devices use. Or their effects on those around us that are also inhaling our vapor.
The proposed regulations by the FDA have certain goals. E-Cigarettes come in candy flavors and are often marketed with familiar children’s icons, like Hello Kitty, prompting concerns from parents that their kids are being targeted with these devices. Does this mean now instead of the pungent cigarette smoke I will now going home with my clothes smelling of tutti-frutti? In addition, there is no ban on television advertising for E-Cigarettes, unlike traditional cigarettes, so there is not stopping their promotion in popular youth programming. One of the many goals of the FDA is to restrict their sale to minors and regulate their marketing practices to discourage attracting them.
FDA officials are hoping that by establishing jurisdiction over the products, they will have better control over the marketing. They compare it to walking before they run.
But another big concern is whether the vapor produced by the devices will be as damaging in the long-term as conventional cigarettes have been. With FDA regulation, it is critical that this is determined before E-Cigarettes become as commonplace as traditional cigarettes have been.
Obviously, smoking is bad for the smoker. But also, second-hand smoke was proven to be dangerous to those inhaling around you. These facts are so well known that major retailers have dropped cigarettes from their shelves in an attempt to appear more health-conscious.
Let me be the first to coin the phrase of Secondary vapor inhalation. I have an image of the future of walking into a bar and seeing a cloud formed in the rafters with all the water vapor that has been exhaled. This cloud would be so thick that there may even be thunder and lighting in the bar….Will we need weather reports for bars now?
How Will This Affect Customer Experiences at Public Places?
Here is the new question you may be greeted with at your favorite establishment:
“Sir, would you like Vaping or non-Vaping?”
hmmm…
On a more serious note, the E-Cigarette regulation by the FDA creates a bit of a yin and yang situation. On one hand, if the FDA don’t approach the regulation of these devices then we will not know if these clouds or water vapor contain any chemicals that could be dangerous to those inhaling second-hand “smoke.” On the other hand, if they do regulate the devices, they are in effect giving tacit approval to their use.
The danger here with E-Cigarettes is that instead of clouds of smoke, we now get clouds of water vapor in the air, a rain-filled atmosphere. To be honest, between England and Sarasota, FL I get enough rain and clouds. Furthermore, I don’t want to go into a restaurant or bar and have people blowing water vapor all around me so that I come out smelling like a candy stick!
This does cause a dilemma for the restaurant, hotel, and transportation owners. Now each must decide if they are going to ban E-Cigarettes in their experience. They need to weigh how these devices will affect other guests. For now, they can likely ban them easily; since the social norm for smokers is that their habit is banned in most public places. But as the regulation and the implicit permission that is represented by that regulation become the norm, the issue is less likely to be so cut and dried.
What do you think about the public use of E-Cigarettes? Should these devices be shut down or allowed to flourish? I’d be interested in any discussion you have to offer on the topic in the comments below.
If you enjoyed this post, you may be interested in the following blogs:
- Three Good Moves This Week That Might Save Your Life
- The Customer Flight Experience
- How the Threat of Amazon Made CVS Pull Cigarettes Off their Shelves
Colin Shaw is the founder and CEO of Beyond Philosophy, one of the world's first organizations devoted to customer experience. Colin is an international author of four best-selling books and an engaging keynote speaker. To read more from Colin on LinkedIn, connect with him by clicking the follow button above or below. If you would like to follow Beyond Philosophy click here
Follow Colin Shaw on Twitter @ColinShaw_CX
View our books on Customer Experience here.
Photo: Milosz_G / Shutterstock
illustrator at sobigalpa
10 年Another name for FDA(FOOD and DRUG agency) of USA is MORAL CHARACTER FORMING AGENCY. Yes that the later name would much better to adopt than to stick to FDA. Of course this comment is not to judge FDA but to criticize the agency for its failure to control the plastic menace but gone to control the cigarettes which are brunt away right from beginning. That is why its name is MORAL CHARACTER FORMING AGENCY. FDA has unnecessarily targeted the poor cigarette considering the fact that more people are killed in USA by --1)guns,2)cars/vehicles 3)industrial/agriculture pollution or smoke and 4)poisonous toxins released by fumes 5)wasted plastics . Cigarettes do cause harm but not that much demonic that the FDA has been portraying. And overall human evolution also works in a way that passive smokers for a long time in a community has led to non -occurrence of cigar smoke related diseases in humans. After all lung diseases also occurs in humans due to poor nourishment, genetic factors other smokes and other fumes rather than cigar smoking. Now what the FDA does( even it has done bad in regulating e- cigar smoking) has a impact in countries like India. So FDA should behave responsibly otherwise for "moral policing" it will be famous.
Advocate/boardmember/com.serv.vol. at
10 年My personal experience around e cig involved trips to ER. I am allergic to tobacco products. THE DOCTOR, said my asthma attack was the worst case of " second hand smoke" sheever heard of. And was dangerous due to my inability to speak, they were treating me for a heart attack. If she hadnt figured out I was mimicing using and inhaler, She said I could have died befoe they figured out it was asthma attack not heart attack. SO NOW I have to wear a wrist band that says Asthma, 2nd hand Air Pollutants.
Program Manager- Technical, Test and Project Management - Delivery Management
10 年Smoking kills, does not matter what format it is!!!!
Enfermeiro Linha Lusíadas Saúde
10 年Apesar de ser uma boa solu??o de substitui??o de tabaco e de todos os malefícios que o fumo do tabaco traz! E obrigatório regulamentar..
I have heard the debate from both sides of the issue ... I just want to know, when will the FDA or WHO (World Health Organization) conduct serious trials on this product and indicate if they are safe for consumption or not.