Why Conflict is Good for Business

This is the 9th post in a series on building high-trust organizations.

As surprising as it might sound, conflict can be a good thing for your business. In high-trust organizations, it can even be great.

In most workplaces, people squabble over creative differences, project ownership, and budgets – they butt heads over all manner of political issues. Generally speaking, the more people there are, the more issues they have to fuss over. It’s just a fact of life – and work. But the difference between conflict in a dysfunctional company and in a high-trust organization is how people deal with it.

Healthy organizations are often the noisiest. To outsiders, they may appear conflict-ridden and unable to find a perfect harmony. But inside, leaders are harnessing the different viewpoints and ideas to power progress, to move the agenda forward. As in most functional human relationships, people in high-performing organizations work through frictions in a spirit of mutual respect. The result is often a creative, outside-the-box solution – or, at least, a compromise. Those benefits may not be as easy to come by in organizations that appear calm on the surface.

Leaders of high-trust organizations know that building trust is among the great benefits of tackling disagreements head-on, rather than letting them fester. Being proactive, even if uncomfortable, can root out fuzzy thinking, faulty practices and purely political maneuvering; and it can get people used to working through differences and trusting one another, instead of working at cross-purposes.

That’s why handling conflict well can boost trust. The key is to convert discord into opportunities for learning and growth. Here are some ways to think about doing this.

1) May the best idea win: Any other criterion for making decisions may well be a symptom of low trust. If the best idea loses, it can mean that disagreement is frowned upon, so certain ideas never get aired in the first place. It could also mean input from junior employees is ignored. When senior management rarely accepts ideas that aren’t their own, they create a climate in which people are hesitant to speak up, falling in line by rank instead. Such companies tend to have a tranquil veneer, but it’s the type of superficial peace you might find in a maximum-security prison.

In high-trust cultures, on the other hand, leaders don’t just look for employees who learn to toe the line. Quite the contrary: when great ideas come from less senior team members, high-trust leaders aim the spotlight at the “unexpected” contributor. That kind of celebration encourages bold thinking and participation from all quarters. Where the best ideas win, more good ideas seem to surface.

2) Think like a mediator, not a judge: An important step toward resolving differences is making sure team members are heard. That means being a good, neutral listener. Before offering feedback, be sure you’ve heard and considered all sides.

If either party in a conflict walks away steaming with resentment, the whole organization suffers. So while you want to exercise the wisdom of a judge, aim also to reflect the attitude of a mediator: instead of assigning fault, or picking a side, look for common ground and create win-win solutions, if you can. It may be that by seeking more viewpoints, and allowing perspectives to clash, the group may settle on a solution built on diverse perspectives.

3) Don’t let tensions boil over: As previously noted, strife has a way of building up and – if ignored – blowing up. Processing conflict along the way is like allowing the safety valve on a pressure cooker to do its job.

That said, it’s inevitable that some conversations will end in anger or hurt feelings. When people are invested in their ideas, they put themselves and their emotions on the line. That’s a good thing. But it’s important as leader to be mindful of the long term. When tensions begin to simmer, take a break. Pick things up later. But be specific, so no one is left hanging: “Let’s revisit this again tomorrow after we’ve both had time to think about it some more.”

Conflict happens -- in businesses, in charitable organizations, in political parties and in families. It means people care about outcomes, and conflict is far better than apathy. So, fostering a culture in which conflict is processed openly is as vital as any habit in the creation of a high-trust culture.

Up Next: Humility is not a weakness

****

To see upcoming posts from Joel in your LinkedIn news feed, connect to his account by clicking the "Follow" button at the top right of the page.

@JoelCPeterson's recent posts:

Photo: iStockPhoto.com

Daniel Flott

??Director of Sales at Rob Levine Law | ?? 15+ Yrs Driving Sales | ?? Mentor & Team Builder | ?? Data-Driven Strategist | Helping law firms grow and increase their bottom lines

5 年

"C'mon...put em up."

回复
Gregory Houston

Manager, Architecture at Schemmer | Business Development Lead | Commercial, Multi-Family, Industrial, and Church Architect

10 年

Anyone for a "fight"?

回复
Rabiu Haruna

CEO/MD Combine Telecoms Solution Network Limited, SFP /CAP MTN Nigeria

10 年

Nice one

回复
Martha Apodaca

Global Management of Change Lead/Training Team Lead at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

10 年

So true, great article...unfortunately too many leaders and organizations don't really understand the characteristics and benefits of a "high trust" organization, they unknowingly promote apathy by failing to harness it.

Mark Sullivan

Program Management | Strategic Planning | Leadership Development | Workforce Planning | Workforce Development | Workforce Diversity

10 年

Sounds a lot like Ron Heifetz' Adaptive Leafership principles of 'maintaining a holding environment' and 'raising the heat.'

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joel Peterson的更多文章

  • Power from Position or from Trust?

    Power from Position or from Trust?

    To lead, one must be empowered. Stanford professor Jeff Pfeffer, a leading expert in the dynamics of power, describes…

    4 条评论
  • ON CREDULITY

    ON CREDULITY

    Once bewildered by COVID’s origin, lockdowns, and restrictions, many have gone on to embrace once-contentious…

    3 条评论
  • .

    .

    Last week, I made a decision to give up teaching “MGE,” a signature second-year course at Stanford’s Graduate School of…

    82 条评论
  • Opinion: Time to cancel ‘cancel culture’ on college campuses

    Opinion: Time to cancel ‘cancel culture’ on college campuses

    Management guru Peter Drucker once observed, “Culture eats strategy for breakfast.” Since values are at the heart of…

    69 条评论
  • Growth Through Adversity

    Growth Through Adversity

    It was a delight to host Hamid Moghadam, Chairman and CEO of Prologis, on the Running Stuff podcast. As one of the…

    5 条评论
  • How to Ruin a Meeting

    How to Ruin a Meeting

    The granular work of entrepreneurial leaders comes down to running meetings and having difficult conversations. Every…

    12 条评论
  • In the Era of Big Data, are Job Interviews Passé?

    In the Era of Big Data, are Job Interviews Passé?

    Nothing is more important to the entrepreneurial leader than assembling the right team. In "Entrepreneurial…

    3 条评论
  • Revisiting the Minimum Wage

    Revisiting the Minimum Wage

    Many want to boost the minimum wage to help with lockdown recovery. Others wonder if a minimum wage hike will merely…

    25 条评论
  • Surviving COVID (and other disasters)

    Surviving COVID (and other disasters)

    Pandemics, wars, depressions, panics, natural disasters – each tests our preparedness, ingenuity and character. They…

    5 条评论
  • The World Needs More Entrepreneurial Leaders

    The World Needs More Entrepreneurial Leaders

    I love many things about teaching at Stanford, but one of my favorite parts of the job is spotting people who have the…

    16 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了