State of Family Law: The Dangers of Dabbling

This post is part of a series in which LinkedIn Influencers analyze the state and future of their industry. Read all the posts here.

Many of the posts by my fellow Influencers will certainly discuss the business angles, financial forecasts and general overview of their respected professions. Unfortunately, the forecast of the need for family lawyers seems to remain consistent so I prefer to discuss the future of the profession as it may impact clients, those going through a divorce or other family law matter. Those are the folks for which I am concerned.

There are lots of fine divorce lawyers but what happens when the economy forces real estate lawyers out of their specialty? Or others? Many turn to family law simply because, as I mentioned above, there is no foreseeable end to the need for family law attorneys. So they "dabble". Some lawyers who have never touched a family law case do amazing jobs their first time around. But my concern for our profession is that there will always be a lawyer who takes on a matter that is over his or her head and is too proud, vain or naive to turn it down or to associate another lawyer whose experience could really be a benefit to the client. And because a law degree typically only requires three years of law school (much less than is required of doctors, psychologists, certain accounting specialties, etc) and passing the bar exam, there are more and more lawyers practicing each year. That means there is less business around, so more lawyers seem to be accepting cases that perhaps are beyond their comfort zone.

And not just in family law. While experience is no guarantee that a lawyer is better, there are some things that simply cannot replace experience. Things like understanding when to really have a heart-to-heart with your client about unrealistic expectations and how to explain to them that the judge will view their situation through much different lenses. Someone once told me a story about a woman who complained about a $10,000 bill from her brain surgeon for a 30 second surgery (he only had to make one surgical cut). His response was that the surgery was not the expensive part, the only expensive part was knowing where to cut. Similarly, knowing when to argue, when to settle, when to object (and when not to, even if there is a basis to object) are all skills that come with repetition. And when lawyers dabble in areas they are unfamiliar with, whether it's family law, corporate law, criminal law or any of the many other areas, the client is at risk of not being presented with all the options and guidance an experienced lawyer might provide. And again, it may work out fine, but the older I get, the more I realize the invaluable nature of significant experience in a chosen area of the law.

Want more insight about this industry? Follow our Law & Government channel.

Enjoyed this post? Read what other Influencers had to say:

? Bruce Katz on the State of Think Tanks: There's a World Outside Washington
? Steve Anderson on the State of Insurance: Ready for Disruption, Agile Thinking
? Richard Branson on the State of Government: Can Developing Democracy Change Business For Good?

Photo: Author's Own

Catheryn Youens

Court Clerk II-D Plumas Superior Court

10 年

Very well said. I agree with having a great deal of experience to represent a party is important. If parties are both wiling, mediation always works. It makes it easier for the case to move forward and settled.

回复
Thomas Holley

Parental Rights & Family Law Resources

10 年

Randy Kessler This article is dead on Randy. I have been representing myself Pro Se for quite a while now. Just recently I had an unfortunate circumstance of an over jealous ex-wife (13 years) who was not finished trying to utilize the family courts as a way to punish me by using a false DV allegation to potentially modify the existing parenting plan of my youngest daughter This time she had my 15 year old (typical teenage behavior) and convinced her and a new attorney (other attorney was tired of getting nowhere) to get her way. This article clearly articulates true and actual accounts of the pitfalls of attorneys who "dabble" with family law. I am just a bricklayer. In family law their is so many tangibles that an attorney from another area of law has no business delving into unless he due diligently does his homework. My suggestion for one is to hire a paralegal with extensive experience in the family law forum. I am by no means a legal genius or well versed in family law, but it is a different world from the rest of the American legal system. I have won many decisions over experienced lawyers and just recently handily received a convincing ruling over a lawyer with a BA, Masters and JD. Why? Because he had no business being in the family law forum without the preparation and experience it takes. If you are a lawyer do yourselves a favor and take this article to heart. It not only makes the lawyers who dabble rethink their position once they have stumbled and failed wondering why? But it also hurts us parents who love our children to have another "lawyer" to ambitiously try to inject themselves into our lives on a false or misleading trumped up story. And possibly hurt the other parents and children with the lack of knowledge and over jealous eagerness to make an extra buck!

回复
Chantal Chambers

Child Care Paralegal at London Borough of Lambeth

10 年

This is so true. Beware of dabblers

回复
Bruce Eden

Independent Legal Services Professional

10 年

I would bet a year's salary that most attorneys in the United States are NOT licensed.

回复
Zahirul Khan

Lawyer and head of chamber

10 年

Important article

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了