Apple: Value is More Than a Stock Price


If you live in a cave, under a rock, or on the moon, I should tell you that Apple have just launched two new iPhone 5 models this week. At the same time they reported that next month they are shipping out their 700 Millionth iOS device

Again, if you live in a cave/under a rock/on the moon, an iOS device is a product that runs on Apple’s proprietary platform and includes things like the iPhone, the iPod, and the iPad. The phones are spectacular and do things they already did well even better, like an improved camera, easier security, better display, more options for color, more services by SIRI... you get the picture.

You would think with all this great news, Wall Street would be dressed up in apple costumes and singing “Johnny Appleseed” the next day. But they didn’t. In fact, Apple stock lost 5% of its value following the roll-out.

Why?

Because they didn’t offer a cheap phone and Wall Street thought they should have.

Wall Street thinks that Apple needs to try to get more market share that is currently held by Google’s Android system, which has 80% of the smartphone market compared to Apple that only has 13.2%. They thought they should do this with a cheap phone.

Apple does offer the iPhone 5C that is considered the entry-level phone at $99 with a 2-year contract, which is lower than the high-end iPhone 5s that is $199 with a 2-year contract. So they did offer a “cheaper” phone. But that wasn’t good enough – it is still too high by Wall Street’s estimation.

But Apple doesn’t think they need to have a cheap phone, despite what Wall Street thinks. They are not concerned about market share. They believe that the iOS is a superior operating system and it is worth more. Plus, their users still love the phone. I know this because I am one of them.

It’s a premium brand, and they want to keep it that way, even if it means that they don’t increase their market share. So the price is still high, and the stock price a little lower. Apple is ignoring the pundits and doing what they think brings the best value to their customers.

Netflix took it on the chin a couple of years ago when they announced that they were splitting the business. They had decided that there would be the mail service DVDs in one “company” and the streaming service in the other. They did this because they knew that the mailing service was a dying business model and they wanted to invest their money in streaming, since that was the future of their business.

At the time, they had just broken the $300 per share mark for the first time. After the announcement, however, their stock started to tank.

Wall Street said that Netflix managers must be absolutely mad to monkey with a formula that was working. They simply had to be the dumbest company out there and were doomed to failure because those at the helm were sure to run Netflix aground. The pundits and fund managers dumped the stock and drove the price down from $300 a share all the way down to $65 a share in only 3 months.

Jump ahead to today, is Netflix defunct? Is it bankrupt? Is it in the red like the little envelopes that used to deliver your DVDs before you figured out that streaming was a WAY better idea?

It isn’t.

Quite the contrary; it is solidly in the black with a 400% improvement on the stock price since the low two years ago.

The secret to Netflix success is fascinating in its simplicity: They invested in their streaming like they said they were going to in the first place. Turns out, they were absolutely right. Streaming was the future of their business. Their customers prefer to stream movies rather than cue them up and get them in the mail. Netflix ignored Wall Street.

If you regularly read my posts, you know that I am a fan of both of these companies.

Both Apple and Netflix are experts at putting the customer first. They both understand the importance of building emotional loyalty with their customers so they can weather the buffets and squalls on the stormy seas of Wall Street.

Apple is like a case study on how to design an emotional customer experience that builds brand loyalty. In some ways, they literally wrote the book. Netflix innovated the way that we rent movies with a superior service. When they changed the service, they realized that it was damaging their long-term business relationship with customers so they changed it back. Both companies have proven that if you put the customer first, and create the best possible value for them, your stock price will follow in the long haul.

The key phrase there is in the long haul. Wall Street doesn’t like the long haul. They want immediate results. They want quarterly earnings reports that meet expectations, to the dollar. They want short-term results, not long haul rewards.

I wrote about this in my post, “A Message to Wall Street: Are You Just Another Hungry Hippo?” Too many companies are giving in to Wall Street’s demand for immediate results and as a result are focused on the short term, increasing margin by cutting costs, and aren’t focused on the long term, increasing loyalty and repeat business from a superior customer experience.

What I love about this even more is that both Apple and Netflix ignored Wall Street in order to enhance their customer experience by creating value for them. For example, Apple’s operating system is the simplest and cleanest for a regular person to use. They are easy to set up, maintain, and protect. Customers like to use their phones because the product is great, and when they have a problem, their empathetic customer experience is great.

And they are part of the club. Apple does a fantastic job of creating a customer culture that their customers are proud to be a part of, which is the envy of other phone companies, including the late great Nokia. In spite of pressure to lower the price of their phone, they kept it high because they know it is worth more.

Netflix is also focused on the customer. They saw before we did, that streaming was more convenient, more cost efficient, and more user-friendly than their original business model. They were ready to invest what it takes to make sure that the service is the best that technology has to offer and are willing to sacrifice Wall Street’s definition of value (stock price) in order to create customer value.

Wall Street believes that your value is what you trade at on the boards.

But some companies that build a loyal following based on their customer experience know that value can grow from proving what you're worth to your customers.

I would love to read your comments on this subject. What are your views, do you agree?

If you liked this article, you might like the following blogs :

Colin Shaw is the founder and CEO of Beyond Philosophy, one of the world's first organizations devoted to customer experience. Colin is an international author of four best-selling books and an engaging key-note speaker. To read more from Colin on LinkedIn, connect with him by clicking the follow button above or below.

If you would like to follow Beyond Philosophy click here

Bryan B.

NMLS# 1950156 |Loan Consultant | Business Consultant | Private Money Lender | Mortgage Note Buyer | Land Investor

10 年

Great article Colin Shaw! It's taken some time but I've trained myself to look beyond current stock prices and focus more on the underlying value within the company. I now look at economic moats and feel that a company is only worth what it can generate in future earnings. Those future earnings are (or are not) fueled by many of the items you list in your article. Great read!

回复
Tom Beirith

Founder and entrepreneur inspired by brilliant people and advanced technologies.

11 年

Apple wrote the book on sustainable competitive advantage in the mobile device market. They also have unleashed far-reaching innovation in this segment. New features like finger print sensor have far wider functional possibilities than you may see on the surface (think mobile-payments, password replacement for email and docs etc.) And what about the new 5s motion sensors? App developers I am sure will take these types of new features to new levels by designing apps which we can't even dream about. Sure Samsung can have better hardware and come out every three months with a new phone or tablet. But this is NOT a sustainable advantage. There are other good Android devices (Sony, LG etc.) which could develop better hardware quickly. And remember Michael Porter's "power of suppliers"? Samsung is totally dependent on Android owned by Google, which now has its own mobile hardware company (Motorola). Can you safely say that Android will remain free? if not, than it will be "hello another Microsoft" and "good bye Samsung profits". In contrast; by getting out of MP3 player race back in the day and creating iPod and iTunes, Apple chose a very different path. Their strategy is sustainable DIFFERENTIATION. What is that? This is the whole ECOSYSTEM of products and devices which are linked connected and constantly evolve as ONE. Switch? Really? ,Where?! To some form of incomplete imitation? Loyalty, great brand recognition etc. are just positive side effects of the sustainable competitive strategy. Stock price? It ALWAYS went down on introduction of EVERY new iPhone. Lets look at it again around Christmas time!

回复
Ankit Srivastava

A seasoned banker, team player and a friend. Love to add value to both my personal and professional connections.

11 年

While the idea of keeping the brand labelled as "Premium", Apple could not deliver for the last two years. The iPhone 4 was the last revolutionary product introduced by Apple and since then they too are playing catch up with the competition. While Netflix invested in technology which was going to replace the current trend, Apple seems to have lost its touch. Hopefully, they too are working on something bigger than just a phone. There have been many examples of similar success stories, one such example is InMobi who initially were an SMS based VAS provider. They too realized that network connectivity on portable devices will change the market dynamics soon and invested in Mobile Advertising. Within 3 years of these operations they were able to compete with Google and are the largest independent mobile ad network. I wish Apple all the best and hope they have something exciting to deal with the competition. Thanks for the article and insights.

回复

I am a heavy multi Apple product user with a dozen devices in the household. there is no doubt Apple understands the emotional attraction of their brand and is at odds with the Street, but the past is littered with defunct companoes who did that. I am not sure the Netflix comparision is really valid for their business model. The key to Netflix's turn around was using the DVD revenue stream to finance building the streaming model, and then converting their base. They did not fear cannibilazation of their base and had intimate knowledge of the customers. Neither point was discussed above.... Whether this turns out like Netflix or like the Lisa or Newton will take a little bit of time to allow the users to demonstrate their response.

回复
Agung Riyanto

Owner di Cosoft Intimedia

11 年

If you have enough fund to share, please visit this link: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/please-help-us-to-expand-our-software-project/x/4754440 and make a donation. If you haven’t got enough fund to share, please make a supportive comment and share this post to your royal friends, so it won’t be ended at the bottom of posts. We really need your help. Thanks for reading. Sharing is Caring.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了