What The Success Of Breaking Bad Teaches Us About Leadership
Breaking Bad is about to enter the second half of its final season, a series that has won much critical acclaim and has become a favorite for many, including me. I can’t think of another show that tackles cringe-worthy topics in such a compelling way. You may have read AMC President Charlie Collier's recent post about why the show deserves to be in the TV hall of fame.
Besides captivating storytelling, Breaking Bad’s success offers some great lessons about leadership and why creativity shouldn’t only be the domain of the creative department. Vince Gilligan may not be the first name that comes to mind when you think of natural leaders, but let’s look at what his experience can teach us.
Don't Play It Safe
It may be a cliché, but I have found that this simple statement holds true: “he and she who dares, wins.” Safe is caring, comfortable, and conventional. That’s fine, but it does not inspire or triumphantly lead the way.
When Vince Gilligan was crafting Breaking Bad, he could have made a number of decisions to make his project an easier sell. He could have chosen a major city for the setting, one that countless viewers would recognize, like Los Angeles. He could have opted for a ‘soft’ or socially accepted drug, one that has already proven to be successful in other shows. Instead, he went for Albuquerque’s suburbia, somewhere that very few of us have, or ever will, experience. He decided to tell a story about meth – an indisputable ugly phenomenon that still troubles the nation, particularly in small cities and rural areas.
Gilligan took a chance and hoped that we would recognize the potential of a great narrative in a meth-cooking chemistry teacher with terminal cancer, a disabled son, and an unfaithful wife. Against most odds, AMC greenlit the series. At face value, Breaking Bad is objectionable, inflammatory and edgy. But again, rather than playing it safe, Gilligan took the path less traveled. The presence of risk alone doesn’t mean you should take it, but leadership recognizes when it’s worthwhile to explore.
Empower People To Play To Their Strengths, Not Yours
Risk taking is not the only time you’ll have to call upon your conviction. You also have to trust that, given freedom, people you lead will naturally find and exploit their fortes. Micromanagement stifles the artistic mind and forces it to second-guess every creative decision with apprehension.
I recently read a story in which Gilligan and the star of the show, Bryan Cranston, revealed that the writers were undecided for months as to how they wanted to bring about the conclusion of the show. But then “at a certain point, you stop and say, let’s just tell a good story,” said Gilligan. People need guidance and they need direction, but that alone isn’t enough. Leadership understands that you can’t force people to work to your strengths and should trust (until proven wrong) that they know what they’re doing.
Constrain Yourself
There’s a reason why Twitter won’t allow us to divulge more than 140 characters at once, why TV shows are made to adhere to a 30 minute or 60 minute format and why looming deadlines (like this LinkedIn post) spur us to think and create faster and better. In short, constraints challenge us.
Gilligan tipped his hand and set the limitations for the series’ narrative when he famously said that Walter White’s journey on the show was that of turning “Mr. Chips into Scarface.” From that point on he confined the show, but in doing so he forced the writers to be as creative as possible within their newfound boundaries. Freedom is an important part of the creative and business worlds but good leaders know how to channel that freedom into a shared goal.
Senior Quality Engineer at Confidential
11 年@Sarah O. Genius? Seriously? Surely it is subjective. Comments often say more about the comentator than the actual subject. I fail to see any "genius" in this soap. It is entertainment for some. Nothing else. If the writer is suggesting that this is a serious piece of social observation then they are even more pretentious than I first thought. I really should stop giving people the benefit of the doubt!.
HR Business Partner
11 年All Breaking Bad fans, check this out: https://goo.gl/VYgCcE
Executive Recruiter @ GSI | PHR, Talent Acquisition
11 年breaking bad is entertainment. Walter white in the "real world" would not be successful in any capacity. especially not leadership.
Analyst at Farfetch
11 年Very few seem to have actually read the article haha. Bravo to Gilligan, Cranston, et al for the risks taken to make the show the success it has been. It's thoroughly exciting stuff. Now, if we were to discuss Walt's journey on the other hand, and what it could teach us about leadership, I would note that he is ambitious and pragmatic, bringing out the best in those around him to further his 'empire.' How it leaves them psychologically (Jesse and Skyler especially...Todd is just a freak) is another thing, as is Walt's rapidly vanishing moral compass and inflating ego. His hubris shall be his downfall eventually. But hey, it's a TV show, you can read as much into it as you want. Or just enjoy it. A lot. Hah. :p
Head of Sales, West at ixigo
11 年I have an issue with this story at a fundamental level. All of us have a choice to make when there is a decision to be taken. I don't advocate ways in which Walter decides to make money for his family when he discover his sickness. His family did not make any such demand. If he felt obligation, he should have opted for any other source of making money, but making meth. Its fictional, and should be kept only as a good story, and strictly not to be used as an analogy. Personally, I will not opt for options chosen by Walter if I were him. Not because I don't have guts or anything, but its more of a moral choice. I don't want to sacrifice others children by offering them drugs for the sake of my own family. And by selling drugs he is precisely doing so. Yes, he would have become my hero if he had made such success from any other appropriate and society accepted professions such as played by his brother in law instead.. But then, it would never have been "Breaking Bad"