Managing Change
Dr. Chris Stout
LinkedIn Top Voice | Best Selling Author | Adventurer | Startup Whisperer | (Accidental) Humanitarian | APA's "Rockstar" Psychologist | éminence Grise
Change can be difficult. I work in a healthcare setting, so clinical change in a patient is a key focus for our clinical staff, but the “change” I am referring to herein concerns how one can deal with the challenges of organizational change in today’s environment.
Many of us have experienced changes in our organizations, in the marketplace, or in the environs in which we operate. Paradoxically change seems to be the new status quo. Things flare-up and settle down in both good economic times and bad. Some of our fellow staff may retire or perhaps have been laid off, or some simply move on for various reasons–going back to school, moving with a spouse who has been relocated, and the like. Those remaining may feel the emotional loss of a friend, co-worker, or reliable employee. We may also feel the intellectual loss of no longer having their “institutional” brainpower. Some may feel the stress of the added burden of having to fill in for their absence. All of these aspects impact us, no matter if we are line-staff, middle managers, or corporate leaders. For some the feeling may be resentment, while for others it could be “survivor gilt.”
Times like these place new demands on all levels of staff. Leaders have to make very difficult decisions, and perhaps make the hard calls that are just as unpopular as they are necessary. It’s tempting for some to sit back and be critical; however, I have come to realize that you can deeply care about what happens to others, but not be in a position to give them everything they want.
A few years ago I started pilot lessons. While flying is a very precise business— logging flight plans before taking off, checks and double checks of the aircraft, analyzing the current and predicted weather patterns, knowing specific rules of the air, and paying attention to an instrument panel filled with gauges to provide unambiguous information on a myriad of variables—I was surprised to learn that in spite of all that detailed exactness, for around 80% of the time in the air, one is NOT flying on course. Flying is really the art and science of constant recalibration and adjustment to ever-changing conditions of weather, pressure, headwinds/tailwinds, etc….or, put another way, dealing with and responding to constant change in various seen and unseen ways.
Sound familiar?
What are some things that we can do? Remember, initial confusion in the face of change will clear, tumults will simmer down, and things will start to re-calibrate But individually, one must work to be agile and adaptive. Most of us, no matter our job title, are paid to handle problems. In a way, problem-solving is the essence of one’s work.
So test the limits of your personal effectiveness and see what you can contribute to your organizations institutional ability to change and improve, you may be surprised. It may come from within yourself, or in the way you supervise and mentor those who may report to you.
Finally, keep in mind that complaining does not equal contributing. Do flag a problem and try to fix it yourself or be willing to offer workable solutions. Consider inventing your future instead of trying to redesign your past. Workloads weigh less when you have a job you love. There are some recurring phenomena that may manifest during times of marked change. Below are some of them and lessons to be learned:
FACT: Trust levels drop during periods of change. People may interpret unpopular events as solid evidence that the organization lacks commitment to staff.
PHENOMENON: Right and wrong perceptions run the show.
LESSON: You must provide generous proof to the contrary, leaving no doubt about your dedication to your people.
# # #
FACT: Change weakens people’s emotional attachment to an organization.
PHENOMENON: Some people quit and leave, others quit and stay.
LESSON: Re-recruit everyone who is staying. Commitment isn't going to show its face until you reconnect the people to the organization.
# # #
FACT: Devotion to the job drops when working relationships get disturbed.
PHENOMENON: Personnel shakeups cause people to pull back psychologically.
LESSON: Take the time/make the time to build or re-build relationships—between supervisors and reporting staff and between the staff members on your team.
Phlebotomist
11 年Sometime I so believe in myself for worked. But my Headward at my Hospital workplace does not build support for subordinates. Cause nucleotide and the lack of confidence from of the blame from her all time. Subodinates were not pleasure at the workplace and want to change a life by changing the the the workplace or changes Headward but very difficult in my country. That are causes me and my colleagues would to the change but can not changes it. Cause stress on the memory and want to early retire.
Director, Sustainability Disclosures and Reporting
11 年"Re-recruit everyone who is staying" I really liked this. Great tip for managers and above.
Customer Success | SaaS | Infrastructure | Operations
11 年Great article!!!!
Business Analytics @ Harvard | Google Data Analytics Certified | CPA - Eligible | Accounting | Finance | Manager | Intrapreneur | Futurist |
11 年Chris, The life is so wonderful, that sometimes we believe been completed and just a matter of short-time situation of our life changed. The most important is to understand those procedures, those movements, and at the end be well prepared emotionally.
Senior Consultant at Terrabit Company Limited and
11 年Two points. Firstly, so long as change folk view business in terms of a "civil engineering" endeavour - ie a relatively stable environment - then change will be defined too late and be disruptive by definition. Secondly if you view business as racing car engineering then you will operate as though the organisation is constantly in motion as you seek to get better and better performance - and define change in these terms. Finally, why would an organisation seeking major change involve those executives who have caused the problems to lead the transformation. Change is readily embraced when the goal of the change is relevant and compelling. What folk loathe is poorly defined and pointless change brought to them by the very architects of the crisis in the first place. Warm regards.