Digital Darwinism: What Killed Borders, Blockbuster and Polaroid and How to Survive

We live in an era of "digital Darwinism," a time when technology and society are evolving faster than the ability of many organizations to adapt. It is for this reason (along with a myriad of other problems of course) that in fact killed Borders, Blockbuster, Polaroid and the like. Not only did digital Darwinism cost us close to a half billion job, it's only accelerating. As Leon C. Megginson once said in paraphrasing Charles Darwin’s Origin of the Species, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change.”

Over the years, I’ve studied how disruptive technology affects consumer behavior and decision-making. I’ve also researched how businesses react (or don’t) to these changes. What I’ve learned is that barring a few exceptional instances of complete ignorance, organizations are open to adaptation if there’s indeed a case made for it and a path outlined to safely and cost-effectively navigate change.

Part of the problem is that decision makers and stakeholders react to shareholders and not necessarily evolving customer expectation or transforming markets. When they are finally ready to react, it’s typically a technology-first rather than a people-first initiative. Without understanding behavior, expectations, patterns, and new touch points, technology is often the right answer at the wrong time. Ready, fire, aim.

Without vision or direction, businesses will always miss the true opportunity...

The chilling effects of digital Darwinism and the rapidly evolving consumer landscape is told in this infographic. It's a project that I worked on with the team at Barnickel Design in New York to mark the occasion of my upcoming book, What’s the Future of Business: Changing the way businesses create experiences.

Here's what you need to know...

  • Digital Darwinism is already here and it's only going to accelerate.
  • Business as usual doesn't stand a chance.
  • You're not too big to fail, you're not too small to succeed.

Read on for what leaders can do about all this... (click here for larger image)


How to Survive Digital Darwinism

In 2012, BDO, LLC, a international services firm providing assurance, tax, financial advisory and consulting services to a wide range of publicly traded and privately held companies, published its Industry Watch Report in 2012. The findings presented a clear division between UK businesses that were able to take advantage of emergent growth opportunities and those who were likely to wrestle with digital Darwinism in difficult markets. As the report found, the “gap between business winners and losers widens.”

So how do you make sure you're on the winners' side?

When I think back to brands I grew up with and where they are today, it’s saddening to see that many of them are gone or dying. Which brands do you remember, and of those, which are no longer with us? Leaders recognize the precious relationship a brand can have with customers. At the same time, there’s a sense of fragility, relevance and determination that must inspire leadership. As Intel’s Andy Grove often said, “Only the paranoid survive.”

While this is not the most cheerful story ever told, the silver lining is that right here, right now, management cultures that evolve into leadership cultures will thrive. And leaders must rise from somewhere and when they do, they need help – fast. You are either that leader or someone that will help leaders bring about meaningful transformation.

Competing for relevance is now a mission of every business and as such, it should be relentlessly pursued. The future of business is not about technology, greed, or short-term deals. It’s about people, purpose, and experiences.

It takes vision.

It takes empathy.

It takes courage.

The future of business lies in the shift from a culture of management to that of leadership and it begins with you.

Photo credit: macappsaddict/Flickr under Creative Commons license

#WTF

Laurence Zurmuhl

Financial Business Analyst

7 年

Amazon with rock bottom prices and free shipping. Amazon just is managing a warehouse and not multiple site location. Complexity is removed. My only concern is that places like borders become a spot for social interaction in the community. A person in front of another is better than a chat site.

回复
Bob Korzeniowski

Wild Card - draw me for a winning hand | Creative Problem Solver in Many Roles | Manual Software QA | Project Management | Business Analysis | Auditing | Accounting |

7 年

Companies must adapt, by obtaining great talent. Talent must adapt, by learning new things and obtaining new skills as circumstances warrant. The problem is that, except for sales, there are no entry level jobs that require no experience. As a result, new grads get hit with that catch-22. The career changers, the most adaptable of the talent out there, also get hit with this catch-22. Talent has done its job by adapting. Companies need to adapt too, by making sure there are entry level jobs that require no experience. The ridiculous idea that an empty chair is better than a rookie for solving problems, needs to die out.

Curtis Rons

Freedom for personal fulfillment, investment success and travel

7 年

50% Fail in the 1st year; 6% more fail in years 2-5.

回复
George McNamara

Mumm lab member (through being HPS Core Manager)

7 年

50% fail + 56% fail = 106% fail ... or bad math in your graphic

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了