Big Idea 2013: What Will 2013 Bring to the Field of Family Law?

Welcome 2013. While the years roll by quickly, laws are often slow to catch up to the times. Legislatures move slowly, politicians worry about how their votes on new laws will affect their chances for reelection. And judges have much incentive to take the safe road, follow the rules and laws that have been around forever and to be sure they are themselves upheld on appeal. To accept a novel argument or interpretation of the law opens a judge up to much scrutiny and criticism. But there remains so much room for improvement in the area of family law. Not just to our laws, but within our profession as well. We need increased civility between lawyers and between parties. We need better education about the process and the tools available to achieve resolution. And we need better, more modern laws, to handle the new realities of our society.

On a national and state by state basis we must address how to help same sex couples dissolve their relationships in a civil manner. If they are not allowed to marry, perhaps they should still be allowed to divorce? Otherwise they will still end their relationships, but the process will continue to be confusing, frustrating and sometimes violent. When human beings have no recourse under the law, they engage in self help (sometimes called vigilante justice). Why not permit these tax paying and law abiding citizens to use our court system to resolve their disputes like other citizens? Wether you approve of same sex relationships or not, they exist and prohibiting same sex marriage, or same sex divorce, does not and will not stop same sex relationships. Instead, it helps avoid land disputes, child custody disputes, title disputes and many other problems that ultimately cause all of us money since our tax dollars pay for courts, policemen and other services that are needed when disputes get out of hand. Courts, when permitted to help members of society, for instance in same sex divorces, will reduce cost, tension and resources across the board and thereby help all taxpayers.

So what about DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act)? Will it fall this year? It seems inevitable. The federal government which has historically left family law matters to the states, stepped deep into family law when it approved DOMA. It seems the current trend is to to see DOMA as overreaching. I believe DOMA will be undone (by the courts, since a majority of legislators will likely never vote to do something that implies that they approve of gay marriage).

And international custody issues including abductions, denial of visitation rights and even simple communication via new technology should be reviewed. We all remember the Sean Goldman custody case in Brazil. There are so many cases like his that are not reported in our press. Kids get taken from (or to) the U.S. and are never returned. Even in countries that have signed the relevant Hague Treaties, it is often difficult to get a child back. And in others such as Japan, it is nearly impossible. We need to work on this in 2013.

But again, civility. Handling our family matters in a civil and peaceful way is a must. It all starts with family. And we as lawyers must do our part. Yes family matters such as divorce and custody disputes fall into our adversarial system of justice. And for some disputes, it must be so. But so many family disputes can be resolved amicably if we just let emotions subside. If we pause and think about how we want our children to know we handled our differences. Wouldn't we all be prouder if family law disputes were resolved by the parties involved and not by lawyers and judges who had never known the family when they got along? Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has played an increasing role in family law. Be it mediation, arbitration, late case evaluation or collaborative law, there are many more options in 2013 than there were in 2003 or in 1993. Let's take advantage of these resources, and lets all, lawyers, judges, mediators, expert witnesses, psychologists and parties, pledge to work amicably. Court decided resolution is never as good as a result agreed to by the people involved. And that can best be accomplished if we act civilly. Especially us lawyers. We do not have to continue seeing the other side after the dispute is resolved. But our clients do. They will go to their kids' weddings and other events together. Lets commit to doing our best to ensure that these future events and life itself, will be better and easier for our clients because of the efforts we undertake. That's my commitment for 2013. I look forward to a positive year of helping people and doing my best to ease their burdens and not to increase them.

Jill Ireland

Data Governance | Data Analysis | Process Automation

11 年

How can the behavior of family law attorneys (as well as the custody evaluators, the psychologists, all the rest who make their livings in this area) change unless their incentives change? Unless they are very good at their work and thus eager to finish one case and move on to the next, it is in their interests to exacerbate conflict, not reduce it. Meanwhile, one thing that is absolutely essential is for family law attorneys to have training in the dynamics of abuse and family violence. If the parties can communicate effectively with each other, they usually don't hire attorneys. The following appears here a couple time: "But so many family disputes can be resolved amicably if we just let emotions subside. If we pause and think about how we want our children to know we handled our differences." This is a nice thought, but if the parties could effectively handle their differences, they might not get divorced, and they wouldn't need lawyers. If they cannot, abusiveness on the part of one or both parties may be a factor, and this should be relevant in custody decisions. For the record, abusiveness is as equal-opportunity as having bad experiences with the family law system. Folks of both genders need to understand that their experiences are representative of all cases: the days of the "tender years doctrine" are long gone, for one thing.

回复
Thomas Leustek

Dean of Academic Programs and Coordinator Agricultural Science Education Program at Rutgers University

11 年

Alternative dispute resolution is a great idea. But first we must change the alimony laws in states like New Jersey and Florida, so that they are fair. If the laws are fundamentally unfair, alternative dispute resolution only leads to people being forced to agree to unfair agreements after their assets have been transferred to lawyers and no money remains to continue the fight for fairness. In New Jersey and Florida, for marriages lasting as few as 10 years, the lower income spouse is entitled to alimony for life. Imagine that, married at 25, divorced at 35, and entitled to permanent alimony for the next 50 years? With a standard like that from which to begin mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution cannot produce fair outcomes.

回复
Nancy L. Zima

Estate Agent / Luxury Waterfront Specialist at Nestler Poletto SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALTY

11 年

When are we going to start collecting acreages on deadbeat DADS that owe on Child Support. I believe the laws are in place, but JUDGES DON'T enforce them. When are we going to make both Parents financially responsible for the children they both brought into this world. WHEN.........

回复
Pegotty Cooper, Co-Founder Certified Divorce Coach

Certified Divorce Coach Training -The Bridge Between the Client and the Divorce Experts, Better Communicator-Better Decision-Maker-More Credible Client.

11 年

Here’s another BIG IDEA for the Family Law framework in 2013 – “Just as the 1990’s brought the rise of life coaches, the new millennium is th age of the divorce coach.” (Geoff Williams, Reporter – Reuters 9-19-12) Divorce Coaches work with individuals in the divorce process to get a better understanding of the options available to them in the business of divorce and help them in becoming clearer thinking decision-makers and more credible clients. Divorce requires a working relationship between the divorcing individuals to redefine the family relationships and to be able to work together in their co-parenting responsibilities. We have seen over and over in the people in our Certified Divorce Coach Training program shifts in their ability to communicate more effectively with their ex-spouse or soon-to-be ex-spouse and many have experienced turnarounds in their ability to effectively co-parent. In cooperation with therapists, lawyers, mediators, CDFA’s and parenting coordinators, divorce coaching can make a huge difference in the outcome of the divorce process.

回复
Adedayo Olakanmi.FCA, CFAN, ACTI, ACIMA, MTFA

Principal Partner@Olakanmi Adedayo & Co at Self Employed

11 年

Family laws should not neglect the place of God neither undermine the position of the word of God.God said " I HATE DIVORCE" So the fact all those crises rock family do not shift God's command.Please lets watch.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了