2 years to get an approval – tell him he’s dreaming!

2 years to get an approval – tell him he’s dreaming!

Everyone working in waste and recycling knows that getting a planning approval for a waste facility is a long and excruciating process. NSW is the worst. No-one wants a waste facility next door so all applications are opposed by someone. It is not a question of whether there will be objections, but how many.

The average approval time for waste facilities in NSW is 1.7 years. 3 years is not uncommon for larger waste infrastructure such as MRF’s, Composting facilities, Transfer Stations and Processing facilities. (Of course some never get approved). 

Energy from Waste and Landfills are harder still. It took almost 10 years to get the Woodlawn landfill approved. Even then the Transfer Station at Clyde (to move waste from Sydney metro) required its own special Act of Parliament. And that was for one of Sydney’s (only two) main putrescible landfills. 

Processing facilities, transfer stations, landfills etc are essential infrastructure. Imagine if the bins from your work and home could not be collected because there was nowhere to take it. The economy would collapse. Waste is no different from power or water in that regard.

And yet there is still no strategic planning for waste assets in NSW. All applications are proponent initiated and there is no overarching needs assessment to guide investment.

With Federal and State Governments now moving to ban the export of recyclates over the next 2 years, there is an immediate additional need for processing sites for over 1.2 million tonnes of recyclate across Australia.

A piece of work recently completed by MRA for ACOR suggested that just to achieve the NSW state targets by 2022 (MSW, C&I and C&D diversion from landfill) there would need to be an additional 30 plants built in western Sydney. This would involve over $2b in investment and employ over 4,000 people.

With those numbers in mind you would think the State Government would be jumping at the chance to facilitate investment and approvals of recycling infrastructure. But alas, no.

While the excellent Waste Less Recycle More grants scheme offered by the NSW Government entices proponents to look at NSW, some of their enthusiasm is tempered by the thought of an extended approval process.

I was at a workshop last week and a representative of one of Australia’s major planning groups said:

“We advise clients to look at QLD and Victoria rather than NSW if they want to build and operate new greenfield recycling and waste businesses”.

Victoria has:

Victoria takes investment in kit seriously.


So how does NSW get its mojo back?

Here are Mike’s priorities, kept to 3 for simplicity:

  1. Develop an Infrastructure Plan – what kit do we need and where?
  2. Amend the Infrastructure SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy) to identify preferred industrial land for waste/recycling infrastructure. (I suggest the words “For the General Industry Zone IN1, the area covered by additional cross-hatching is a preferred area for waste/recycling infrastructure. Consent authorities should prioritise waste/recycling infrastructure and limit incompatible encroachment on existing facilities, in these areas”.)
  3. Prioritise ‘Waste Less Recycle More’ grants to get it built.

Simple. It will generate investment and jobs. 

The Planning and Environment Ministers could easily get it done in 6 months.
Zackery Thomas

POLICY | LEADERSHIP | STRATEGY

4 年

Agreed Mike; further, the waste asset strategy and planning requirements should be more closely linked with the risk based licensing system to reassure the public and optimise outcomes, whilst providing exemptions and support for small, innovative research and development projects.

回复
Dayne Steggles

Solutions built on passion in my role as Newcastle Business Manager at Benedict Recycling, Steel River Eco-Industrial Park.

4 年

I’m a little confused. You rightfully acknowledge the funding successes, yet seem to ignore in totality the consultation & process from which it was borne. Namely the impressively accurate Waste & RR Infrastructure Strategy 2017-2021. Not sure on the assertion ‘And yet there is still no strategic planning for waste assets in NSW. All applications are proponent initiated and there is no overarching needs assessment to guide investment.’ Despite the challenges with DoPIE, of which approval time lags are only a scratch on the surface, í decisions in our sector are like water divining some would say.

回复
Frank Klostermann

Board/Executive Advisor/Consultant - Circular Economy Expert

4 年

Mike, I agree with what you have written re planning, not so sure about your 3 step plan, though. But one thing is for sure: “where there is a will, there is a way”! What we need is strong political will. If we can shut down an economy within a few weeks, surely we can build the waste infrastructure we need.

回复
Darren North

Leading and delivering improved outcomes and services.

4 年

Mike has a simple 3 step plan, tell him he must be dreaming ?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mike Ritchie的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了