S. 102(3) Cr.P.C. | Police Seizure Wouldn't Get Vitiated Altogether Due To Delayed Reporting To Magistrate: Supreme Court

S. 102(3) Cr.P.C. | Police Seizure Wouldn't Get Vitiated Altogether Due To Delayed Reporting To Magistrate: Supreme Court

Reversing that part of the High Court's findings which had declared the seizure report to be vitiated because the report wasn't sent forthwith to the magistrate, the bench comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and Aravind Kumar observed that although the law requires the police to send the seizure report to the magistrate 'forthwith' (came to be interpreted as 'as soon as possible') but the delay in sending the report to the magistrate wouldn't vitiate the act of seizure by the police altogether. Read More>>


The Complete Supreme Court Annual Digest- 2023 [Part-XX]

Deactivated mobile number not assigned to new user for 90 days, TRAI tells Supreme Court; Whatsapp data removed when account inactive for 45 days. Rajeswari v. Union of India, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 951 : (2024) 2 SCC 604. Read More>>


He Will No Doubt Come Out Of Jail, Only Concern Is When: Sibal Presses Supreme Court For Hemant Soren's Release During Lok Sabha Elections

Justice Khanna told Sibal that Soren would be able to come out of jail if he makes a case. Sibal responded by saying that Soren would eventually come out, there is no doubt about that, but the concern at this stage was Lok Sabha elections. He gave the example of Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, who was recently granted interim bail by the court (till June 1). Read More>>


"Misconceived": Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Seeking FIR Against Prime Minister Narendra Modi Over Alleged 'Hate Speeches'

The petition sought a direction on the ECI to take immediate action in accordance with law including filing of FIRs against candidates delivering hate speeches in violation of MCC. Read More>>


Permission For Temple's Festival Can't Be Denied On Grounds Of Model Code Of Conduct: Madras High Court

“This Court has taken note of the fact that the election has been completed and the polling is already over. Further such reasons cannot be accepted for conducting the temple festival,” the court said. Read More>>

要查看或添加评论,请登录

LiveLaw的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了