10 Tough Questions Atheists Often Encounter
Geoffrey Moore
Author, speaker, advisor, best known for Crossing the Chasm, Zone to Win and The Infinite Staircase. Board Member of nLight, WorkFusion, and Phaidra. Chairman Emeritus Chasm Group & Chasm Institute.
This is the title of a blog entry I found some time ago somewhere on the Web.? It is important to me because the whole point of The Infinite Staircase is to present a secular theory of reality that can provide a foundation for a values-driven life.? This is a role traditionally assigned to religion, and to take it on does indeed entail a number of tough questions to answer, ones that religions typically handle quite well. ??Here they are:
Before we get into them, however, there are a couple of points I want to make.? The first is that I bridle at the binary distinction between theists and atheists.? There is a lot of spiritual experience that flows between the two, and to polarize the field into “Ins” and “Outs” is to sacrifice understanding on an altar of righteousness.? It just doesn’t help.?
The second is that a lot of the dialog between religious and atheist points of view is burdened with a kind of one-upmanship on both sides that is neither pleasant nor useful.? That is not my goal here.? The questions above, in my view, are totally legitimate, and pursuing answers to them is a worthy effort, regardless of one’s chosen life-narrative.? I want to use them to pressure-test an intentionally secular narrative in a spirit of genuine curiosity.? How do atheists answer these questions??
In that spirit, let’s turn to the first one—how can one explain the origin of the universe without invoking a creator or first cause?
The secular narrative here is a famous one—The Big Bang!? It claims that the universe, as we can observe it today, came into being around 13.8 billion years ago in a singular event.? Here’s how I describe it in The Infinite Staircase:
That is, in a millionth of a millionth of a millionth of a millionth of a millionth of a second, the universe of space and matter expanded by a factor of a billion billion billion—give or take! From that jump-start (they call it cosmic inflation), it has been expanding ever since. This universe, as best we can tell, consists of billions and billions of galaxies, each of which, like our very own Milky Way, contains billions and billions of stars, one of which happens to be our sun, around which orbits our Earth, a planet hosting a life form that, during its exceedingly brief existence, has somehow been able to figure all this out.
Now, I ask you, have you ever heard of any creation myth from any culture that is more astoundingly miraculous than that? Of course, being a secular culture, we don’t call it a miracle—we call it a singularity—but, I mean, really.
Of course, this still begs the question, who or what caused the Big Bang?? But I think the more salient point is to acknowledge that explaining something that happened 13.8 billion years ago is simply above our pay grade.? After all, as a species we might claim around ten thousand years of experience developing our language-enabled explanations.? That is less than one-millionth of the amount of time the observable universe has been around.? And the notion that there are billions of stars in our galaxy is mind-boggling enough without having to add that there are billions of other galaxies with their billions of stars as well.?
Narratives of cause and effect are simply not designed to cope with such numbers.? Of course, we can make stuff up, and we do, and that can serve any number of purposes, but we are imagining something that we really have no legitimate claim to understand.? What the astrophysicists have done, by contrast, is to extract their narrative from data from the last century or so, which shows that the universe is expanding.? They have extrapolated that expansion back into its past, leading to a point of convergence, although where that point could possibly have been no one can say since there was no space or matter at that time.? ?The math actually works remarkably well, but words are simply at a loss to explain
So, the answer to our first question is that atheists explain the origin of the universe as a singularity, meaning a single unaccountable event that we must simply accept as fact, for which the closest word in common parlance, in my view, is miracle.
That’s what I think.? What do you think?
There must be Ins or Outs. Theism and atheism are binary, mutually exclusive. Theism based on faith and tradition, atheism based on observation and evidence. Theism requires miracles, atheism rejects them. Intellectual rigor forbids mixing miracles and facts. To assign a purpose for mankind, some find solace in old texts about the will of Jehovah, Zeus, another deity. They may also accept science, but if it contradicts old dictums, they cite the unknowable mind of God as tiebreaker. Expedient, but straddlers lack logical consistency. Welcome faith-based belief systems -- God created everything with divine rules. Welcome an observation-evidence framework -- a random universe without a deity. No need to overlap concepts to complete the reasoning or satisfy somebody else. To some, faith provides every answer. Others need no miraculous explanations. Atheists don’t crave divine stopgaps if scientific issues (e.g., dark matter) are partly elucidated. Man makes morality by understanding mutual benefits and harms. Only Christians care if Jesus actually existed. Separate millions never land on a conceptual pole, which proves nothing. Uncommitteds may not consider the issue -- unfazed by actual logic of being In, Out or straddling.
I love the awe in your description of the singularity. And I love your rejection of the polarization between theists and atheists. I am a committed theist but find the traditional view of creation limited. The Grand Canyon was created in a day as espoused by some sounds like a kid playing with playdough. What about the millions and billions of years of erosion and deposition that created the glorious layers of stone that were carved by thousands of events into these glorious shapes? I see the creation continuing- every time I see the sand in the Colorado River. Isn't awe at the span of time and the creative vision the appropriate response? Isn't that as amazing, no, more amazing than a vision of creation that limits it to a human understanding of what it means to create? I'm just going to hang out in the awe and let others debate the number of angels dancing on the head of a pin.
Founder/CSO at DryvIQ | Formerly SkySync
1 小时前If no purpose - then why live at all? You’re going to be dead a whole lot longer than you’re alive, so what’s the difference on how long you “live” in contrast to death??If you believe that to be true, you are no different than dirt –then why does living (experiences, memories) even matter? There is analysis that suggests that theists live longer than atheists. In that context, their own beliefs actually work against their limited time of existence. We can’t even make an ant - yet somehow atheists want to gain a deep understanding the meaning of the universe and life – seriously? ?IMHO, it’s a copout of simplification to an incredibly complex data set that we have zero chance of ever understanding. Until I started my personal religious journey, I trivialized, “Seek and you shall find”…now I get it.?
Senior Principal Product Manager at NetSuite
5 小时前For the interested skeptics, I encourage a read of Lee Strobel’s Case for a Creator https://www.amazon.com/Case-Creator-Lee-Strobel/dp/0310242096
Unternehmer, CEO, gipsoft d.o.o.
6 小时前Scientifically, we will never be able to fully explain it, just like the blueprint of our DNA and the miracle of life. I think it's wonderful that you emphasize how important it is not to polarize and harden the fronts here. After all, atheism is also a belief in a certain way and believers should not judge others and vice versa. Even among believing scientists there are discrepancies that can only be overcome through mutual respect in the spirit of Christian charity. An interesting book that I would recommend would be "Creation and Evolution?" which is unfortunately only available in German. Believing scientists have different views regarding the exegesis of Scripture and how it fits into a scientific context. https://amzn.eu/d/aV2WJK0