If 0,0425%CO2=425ppmCO2 has to warm up 99,9575%=999575ppm ... CO2_Heat_Gain=999575/425=2352x ?

If then ...

To warm up by 1°C those 999575 atmospheric parts, almost a million parts, from 425 parts CO2, what is the CO2-temperature to start from ?

Greenhouse gasses are supposed to absorb low energy infra red long wave photons emitted at +15°C=288°K earth average surface temperature and send those photons back down to earth.

Can those low energy infra red long wave photons warm up a greenhouse gas molecule warmer than +15°C=288°K spreading the photonic energy of 425 CO2 molecules over the other 999575 atmospheric molecules ?

Is the climate greenhouse a self warming house emitting long wave photons up in the air that come back down like a boomerang ?

To get 1 boomerang coming back you need to throw 1 boomerang and the law of conservation of boomerangs says that 1 boomerang does not procreate to become 2 boomerangs ?

Is greenhouse global warming a violation of the law of conservation of energy ?

Global cooling is based on boomerangs that don't come back like photons that don't come back down to earth and escape to space.

But :

Physicists: Non-Greenhouse Gases (O2 and N2) Are Mainly Responsible For The 33°C Greenhouse Effect

• O2=Oxygen
• N2=Nitrogen
• CO2=Carbon Dioxide

If O2 and N2 are also greenhouse gasses mainly responsible for the +33°C greenhouse effect, then 0,04% CO2 makes only 0,04% of the greenhouse effect of you neglect the water vapor.

Anyway

In climate science there are too many unanswered questions and too many unquestioned answers ...

But : Health & Climate & Energy are really very complicated and delicate politico-scientific stuff and also socio-economic stuff but we do the best we can and try to explain it as simple as possible but not simpler than that in the group :

CCR="Climate Change Revival.