Today in Asia Times, I wrote about the US's strategic dilemma in updating its amphibious warfare fleet. Aging ships and emerging threats necessitate a choice between investing in numerous but smaller ships or a few larger but potentially more vulnerable ones. This conundrum is compounded by rigid mindsets within military planning circles and the US Navy's current operational challenges with existing ships needing maintenance or facing decommissioning despite not reaching their planned service life.
The recent focus on ship readiness, as evidenced by the urgent studies by top Navy and Marine Corps officials, highlights the immediate need for robust, flexible solutions. Past approaches show a pattern of underinvestment in maintenance, leading to capability gaps. This scenario underscores the broader strategic challenges of maintaining a credible force projection in the face of advanced anti-ship and surveillance technologies that adversaries like China are deploying.
Independent Think Tank Professional
2 个月The Navy Department decommissioned the tank battalion aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton -- and service-wide elsewhere. Formerly quartered at Camp Flores aboard Pendleton, the Marine Corps trained tankers there, and those Jarheads always exceeded the capabilities of the Army tankers trained at Fort Benning. (now wokely renamed "Fort Moore") Marines relied on tanks for cover in close quarter urban combat scenarios. Losing this capability means that Marines in future conflicts must rely on lesser capable Army tankers, or not have cover provided at all. This is the dummying down of the Marine Corps that now needs a revival with a gutsy Commandant reminiscent of General Alfred M. Gray, Jr. Semper Fi. .