Umar Hameed的动态

MVP is almost a four-letter word nowadays. Many people claim to be building an MVP when they're really building something that goes far beyond a minimum viable product. Here are some tips for thinking through priorities when building a new product.

An MVP’s (minimal viable product) job is all about testing and learning. It’s not meant to be a polished product. The ???????? is to ?????????? ???? ???????? ???? ???????????????? with the ?????????? ???????????? ???? ??????????????????????. You're not going to make everyone happy, and that's ok. Start by solving one problem for a niche part of your visionary audience. Tackle this first, then expand. And guess what? This doesn’t even require building software. Create the simplest version of your product that addresses their needs and pain points. It can even be a manual solution at first. Launch it to a small group and collect feedback. Use these insights to make data-driven decisions and iteratively improve your product. Remember, an MVP is about learning quickly and efficiently. By starting small and focusing on a niche, you can gather valuable insights without overcommitting resources. Are you struggling with building your MVP? Let’s connect—I’d love to help you navigate this journey. #ProductManagement #StartupGrowth #TechIndustry #ProductMarketFit

After a few years working in the IT field, I had the chance to learn from both start-up and outsourcing companies. I was surprised by how these two types of companies approach problem-solving and product-building differently. One key difference is the mindset of building an MVP (Minimum Viable Product). This is a very smart way to validate ideas before building a fully functional project. I have learned a lot and want to share this with everyone. Basically, an MVP is a product with just enough features to attract market attention. It helps you reduce the time spent building large projects that may not be effective. "Sometimes less is more," my mentor used to say. I also wrote an article about this, where I include my personal steps for building products. If you have time, you can check it out for more insights. Last but not least, happy coding!

In the early stages, founders are driven by a vision. But how do you know if your idea is worth pursuing? At Visolab, we focus on helping founders validate their ideas quickly and effectively, avoiding the common pitfalls that often slow down progress. Our approach begins with defining a lean MVP, one that focuses only on core features with a clear value proposition. Building a lean MVP doesn’t mean creating a bare-bones product—it means developing a targeted version that solves a critical problem for your audience. Once the MVP is live, gathering real user feedback becomes essential. Testing early with actual users provides insights that no amount of theoretical planning can replace. Validation is not a one-time task; it’s a continuous process. Every user interaction tells a story, helping to refine the product through data-driven adjustments until it’s ready for a broader audience. At Visolab, we prioritize efficiency, knowing that time and resources are tight at this stage. We rely on agile practices to keep development fast, focused, and aligned with the founder’s vision, so they can make informed decisions about the future of their product. Building for validation isn’t just a phase; it’s a mindset. If you’re a founder looking to bring your idea to life, Visolab is here to help you take those first, crucial steps.

Why and how building an MVP (minimum viable product) quickly? Embrace rapid MVP development! Launching quickly and iterating based on user feedback is more effective than spending excessive time on surveys. Most important point about MVP which is you'd only really start learning about your users when you put product in front of it.User surveys help identify pain points, but user interaction with a product provides irreplaceable insights. There's a common misconception that initiating with something small, possibly not working perfectly, is a poor choice. Many fear that presenting a small product to a customer, and if it falls short, could lead to a lost opportunity. Contrary to this, most individuals interested in engaging with startups are early adopters, accustomed to using imperfect products. They connect with you not expecting perfection but because they genuinely have a problem and are open to adopting new software. You need not fear losing these individuals as they thrive on trying new products regularly. Assure them by saying, "I can't promise perfection from day one, but with your collaboration, we'll continuously improve and ensure it meets your needs over time." Source of the learning: https://lnkd.in/gnPzXWze #productdevelopment #productthinking #minimumviableproduct #productinnovation #productmanagement #productgrowth #product

The key isn't just developing more, it's developing better. ??? Many times in the world of software development, we fall into the trap of thinking that "more is better." The more features we build, the more successful the product will be, right? But is that really the case? As a Product Manager, I believe the real value lies in asking first what we should develop and why. The success of a product isn't measured by the sheer amount of code written, but by the efficiency and impact of every single line. I've seen how sometimes it's assumed that once we've done "what's necessary" to get the product working, we can start building whatever we want. However, it's crucial to stop and think: Are we solving a real user need? ?? Are we optimizing what we already have? ??? Are we investing enough time in research to make informed decisions? ?? The time we spend on analysis, research, and validation shouldn't be seen as downtime but as a strategic investment. Developing without analysis is like flying blind. It's not always about adding more features but about optimizing what exists and ensuring every new functionality serves a clear purpose. In short: It’s not about doing more, it’s about doing it better. And that “better” starts with analysis, understanding, and a user-centered approach. ?? #ProductManagement #SoftwareDevelopment #OptimizeBeforeYouBuild #BuildBetter #UserCentered #TechLeadership #ProductStrategy

The goal of an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is to validate key assumptions about a product idea and gain maximum learning with minimal effort. The primary aim is to learn quickly, minimize risk, and increase the chances of success through experimentation, not necessarily to create value for customers immediately. Developing a full product, such as software, can be an expensive and inefficient way to test hypotheses. If the assumptions are incorrect, significant time and resources may be wasted on iterations. Building the initial MVP, however, should only take a few hours or days, making it a much cheaper and faster approach to testing ideas. #SoftwareDevelopment #Coding #MVP #ProductDevelopment #ProductDiscovery

WTF is digital product development? It’s research.? It’s validation. It’s finding the white space.? It’s understanding the user(s). It’s designing the functions you want to perform.? It’s creating flawless flows. It’s wireframing, testing and iterating.? It's creating a cohesive and scalable design system. Then it’s building like mad. Programming. Programming. Programming.? Building the highest priority features based on the research.? Not spreading yourselves or your features too thinly. Not trying to build every feature you can think of. Not thinking you know what the customer / client wants.? Retaining razor sharp focus.? Focussing on that single key metric and making sure every stakeholder has that same, singular goal. ? But still running in iterative sprints. Not placing artificial constraints in the way - working in agile. Tying everyone together to get something, anything in front of customers as soon as possible and then building to their requirements. …and then doing the same. Again. Again and again. Responding and building. Listening, designing, responding, building. That’s how you build a successful product. That’s how you get product market fit. Sounds simple doesn’t it? It’s not. #digitalproduct #development #startups #digitaltransformation #agency #digitalagency p.s. we just got a new kitten. She's silly and knows nothing about digital product development and I have no way of linking the content of the post with the image apart from the fact that she's called Mimi, she's cute and it's clickbait.

Product leads, are your features making a real impact? Does your company focus on churning out new features, hitting deadlines, and coding away like there’s no tomorrow? Congratulations, you are in a Build Trap! The Build Trap is basically when companies get stuck in this cycle of pumping out features without really considering if they're making a difference. Sure, the features might look great on the surface, but are they solving real problems for your users? The Build Trap is sneaky because let's be real, it’s easy to get caught up in the rush of shipping things out. But the real magic happens when you shift focus from outputs (like features and deadlines) to outcomes – the actual value those things bring. So, how do you escape this trap? Start by asking the hard questions: ?? Are these features genuinely improving the user experience? ?? Are they addressing the pain points users have? ?? Are the features boosting our company's financial well-being? Adopt practices that shift focus from simply building products to delivering value, such as : ? Focus on understanding customer needs deeply. ? Shift focus from output (features developed) to outcomes (impact on customers and business) ? Foster collaboration between product, engineering, design, marketing, and other relevant teams. Companies that break free from the Build Trap often prioritize learning from user feedback, conducting meaningful research, and focusing on delivering real value rather than just shiny new features. Remember, it’s not about how much you build! It’s about what your build does for your users. Keep that in mind, and you’ll be on your way out of the Build Trap in no time! If you wish to explore this topic further, I invite you to peruse the following article: https://lnkd.in/ejxs5Vur Do you want to discuss your development process? maybe I can offer a few recommendations. Grab a slot: https://lnkd.in/gcKSSy23 #productstrategy #productvision #productgrowth #productdevelopment #emproconsulting #productleaders

Assume, explain and be ready for a change. No matter how clear the requirements are there can be uncertainties when developing a feature. Even contradictions. Even more so at the very early stages of a venture. How should an engineer proceed? Ask for clarification the responsible party? In the very early stage of a startup most probably this will be the founder. Stopping and waiting for the answer will potentially waste "one communication cycle". In the case of 5-hour time difference this could mean a day. As an engineer, make the decision instead. Make an educated guess what would be the most valuable for the end users. Then: -> Implement the assumption. -> Present it to the relevant party. -> Explain your reasoning. -> Be ready for a change. At most this will be a "waste" of few hours of work. From my experience throughout the years working with different founders and product owners, there is rarely a case when the work is "wasted". Most of the times the assumption is correct and another iteration with more specific requirements builds on top of it. Few rules that I follow when making such assumptions: -> Strive for the simplest solution. -> Optimize the code for changeability. -> Keep the code for the assumption close. Don't overdo abstractions. The benefits I've observed: -> Non-blocking development. -> The exercise for stepping into the shoes of the end-user keeps me thinking from their point of view. -> Having the constraint to optimize for simple and changeable code results in more maintainable code usually. -> I feel that my input makes a difference and my voice matters. -> The founder and/or product owner can rely more on me. More time for them to focus on other matters. What's a good practice that have worked for you in the cases of uncertain requirements at the very early stages of a venture? #productdevelopment #startupengineering #techleadership