Gen Z doesn’t exist. ? Neither do millennials, Gen X, boomers, or the silent generation. ? Cohorts like these are totally made up. ? And using them carries risk. ? It feeds stereotypes, encourages laziness, and causes people to imagine traits. ? We should stop pretending clichés are insights. ? Like these ones… ? Gen Z Outraged, tech-savvy, environmentally and socially conscious. ? Millennials Overwrought, juggling new children and aging parents. ? Boomers Preoccupied with healthcare, and who to leave their money to. ? These generalisations just loosely describe young, middle aged and old people. ? Making assumptions about tens of millions of people based on their birthdays. ? That’s not social science. ? It’s astrology. ? #businessofcreativity #GenZ #Millennials #Boomers
Usually people comment on things to express agreement to statements but I invite everyone to think a bit differently. Personally, I toss around ‘genz’ as a social term quite a bit in conversation because realistically, my generation has been exposed to different challenges, i.e. housing crisis, climate change, pandemic, etc, that entice us to act completely differently from a boomer, for example. We grew up in the digital world, ofc we will communicate differently and ofc we will have different dexterities and priorities. In your own words: that is >literally< social science. Our circumstances for survival are also widely different - salaries are disproportionate, cost of living is unjustified, and us together with millenials were given the responsibility of figuring out how to deal with the climate negligence brought by previous generations. Generalising groups and reinforcing stereotypes is a perfect way to remove authenticity and I see that at times it does everyone a disservice but let’s all agree to disagree that all 3 gens you brought up above are widely different in principles. I’d like my struggles to be understood, hence why it’s probably a good idea to consider them all differently.
I’m a millennial, and I am neither overwrought, juggling any children nor aging parents and I’m certainly not the exception. I also don’t feel like a traditional millennial when it comes to marketing, and I know plenty who don’t either. I’m also a woman and don’t ascribe to most of the traditional marketing approaches around makeup, fashion, diet or lifestyle. I think many women of my age are particularly misunderstood - especially those of us who are (happily) childfree, independent and single. It’s nice to put people in buckets as a marketeer when generalising but I think the best, most creative stuff is found when unnoticed, misunderstood groups are targeted effectively.
Generations exist because historical periods exist. Generational thinking in marketing is subpar. Generational thinking in academia is much better because it takes the full spectrum of a generation, both right and left wing, lower class, middle class, etc. Ignoring history is lazy, not understanding a generation as a full spectrum tapestry is lazy. These type of posts are lazy because they have not been thought thru all the way and people get excited oh look sir John also thinks generational labeling is stupid. The way the market research sector does it is usually stupid but it doesn’t mean generational research or historical context is stupid.
I think the generalisations are the issue/problem, not the understanding of human beings of different ages dealing with significant events during their formative years of growth and development that influence their attitude, how they see the world, how they interact with and how they deal with it. I've only ever seen demographics/segmentation/generational labelling as a framework, not an absolute - ultimately we're dealing with homo-sapiens who don't react based on logic or don't live their life by segmentational definitions (just ask the behavioural econometricians) ;)
Yeah, these generations reflect our collective cultural experience, not anything more. Like how in this post Gen X doesn't get the descriptor or a hashtag. It captures our collective experience well (we enjoy staying under the radar). ??
Also, all the avatars in the little picture suggest women don’t exist at all so definitely something awry…
I agree with being cautious about using such cohorts, but it has some advantages, such as providing individuals with a sense of belonging and identity, which can enhance social cohesion and cooperation within the group (even if that group is somewhat arbitrary). It's not social science but I won't call it astrology either. It's a crude labelling system that has some utility in certain contexts and should be used with some basic understanding of what it does and does not include.
Um ... "These generalisations just loosely describe young, middle aged and old people." Those are also generalizations. I understand why some of the generalizations about the generations are offensive or stretch too far, but I don't understand what's so problematic about these generalizations compared to others. "Old people tend to have money and descendants, so they're more focused on healthcare and who to leave their money to than young, healthy people with no money and no kids" is a useful generalization for selling stuff to them and deciding what perks they want at work. And many of the generational generalizations are similar. "People who grew up carrying phones and cameras in their pockets have different communications styles than people who had to catch a human being on the phone to take a message on paper" can also be a useful generalization.
I agree using can feed stereotypes and lazy thinking. That does not mean they do not exist. Psychologically we are products of our lived experience. Each person experiences events and social change as they grow up. The reactions to the events and social changes are processed similarly by a peer group. Additionally, the classroom environments changed based on size, demographics, and relative importance of the materials presented. Denying the lived experience a of person based on the year of their birth is just as harmful a making arbitrary judgments.
PR& Writing |Corporate Communications | International Corporate Finance and Governance Experience | Personal and Business Branding
3 个月For me these categories represent economic opportunities, experience with technology, lifestyle, cultural references, etc and along that preferences and many more, etc. You will not be able to sell overpriced celebrity sponsored energy drinks to a Broomer who will invest every penny and make the most out of it to get a Bentley instead....this is what these mean for me in the language of marketing. Marketing on its own works along stereotypes when defining your ideal customer.... well even now have a look at the reactions to your post... you will easily be able to guess the category: yourself: Boomer (believes in elitism,meritocracy), there is a Gen-Z young genetleman with desperation in his voice, there is a GenX- complete insensitvity to ineqaulity and agrees with very little idea about what is going on in the world, myself a Millennial who is trying to explain all these to you. :-)