Rudolf Huber的动态

Cefic sees in the base case of iC2050 for the European Chemical Industry still a high share of fossils (with CCS), high share of biomass (available?), surprisingly small share for recycling and almost no CO2 utilisation.

Sander what if we could drop a pipe into the ocean and suck up the water and aerosilize it with GHOST Airships powered by H2 and taken from the air and ocean...? Wouldn't a higher dispersion altitude, say 9,000 ft not only reflect more solar radiation but disperse it further, and also last a lot longer, hang time, thus creating a column of slightly dimmed air flows, that would reflect even more radiation more evenly? The largest GHOST airship will be able to carry up to 2 million lbs payload, which we can pack with iron oxides and other beneficial minerals, sodium bicarbonate or whatever is deemed most effective to reduce acid in ocean and seed biomass life forms. Sander Epema

Wetlands are efficient carbon sinks.They absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it in plant biomass and soil. When wetlands are encroached upon, their ability to sequester carbon from the atmosphere is compromised. #Thecostofwetlanddegradation #Protectwetlands

Understanding the genetic factors involved in developing a natural hydrogen system – and categorising these into sources, migration paths, reservoirs, traps and seals – allows the creation of favourability maps which can provide clear targets, away from known hydrogen occurrences, for focused evaluation efforts. Find out how we are locating natural hydrogen: https://lnkd.in/eUyhTFbP??? ?? #GTC #NaturalHydrogen #Hydrogen #WhiteHydrogen #Exploration #Decarbonisation #EnergyTransition?

https://lnkd.in/gEN4_vBi.. Demonstrably and scientifically effective benefits of biomass in rainforests especially in the Amazon rainforest "the lungs of the earth" and the South Pacific region's combined legally binding maritime boundaries and jurisdictions is the world's biggest carbon storage as the world's biggest "carbon sink" creating significant carbon storage, oxygenation and regulating global temperatures. ??

I recently made two posts about the largest annual emitters of CO2 equivalent due to industrial emissions and the burning of fossil fuels (https://lnkd.in/d7YEiM7E and https://lnkd.in/d5Y6MmXd ) A recurring comment in these posts was that CO2 emissions due to forest fires had not been considered. I consider these emissions to be very different: burning biomass, from any source (firewood, forests, fat, biofuels, etc.), just returns to atmosphere the CO2 previously captured from the atmosphere. Burning fossil fuels puts “new” CO2 into the atmosphere, as does fugitive methane from oil production. But, obviously we need to use biomass to remove carbon from the atmosphere and not the other way around. The video below shows the number of fires (natural or caused) during the 21st Century. Some observations: ?? Fires occur across the entire globe. ?? In the southern hemisphere, the biggest fires occur (on the 3 continents) in the tropical region (up to the 30th parallel - close to the Tropic of Capricorn). In the northern hemisphere, fires occur “above” the Tropic of Cancer. ?? Despite public opinion, heavily influenced by the media, the highest density of fires on the globe occurs in the tropical zone of Africa, more specifically in Congo, Angola, Tanzania and Zambia. The fires in equatorial Africa region are also significant. ?? às expected, the greatest number of fires occurs in the most extensive countries: Brazil, Russia, Australia, Canada, etc ???? And, obviously, to have burned forests you need to have forests…

??????Climate-adapted trees or full #biodiversity? Planting only the most climate-suited trees does not guarantee the highest future biomass & carbon sequestration. A new PIK study shows that a diverse mix of trees increases long-term #forest biomass in the face of #climatechange. ? Link to the study: doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17258

Watch my conference talk about #ROCKCHAR and learn about the first observations.

Let's C At 18% of body mass, and at 8 billion people at say, about 70 Kg average weight, the total amount of carbon in all humans is about 0.1 billion tons (100 million tons) All terrestrial animals contain about 2 billion tons of carbon Human activities (or, if you prefer, the rather elegant and easy word anthropogenic) emit about 12 billion tons of carbon (35 billion tons of CO2), most of this carbon being dug up from under the earth. All terrestrial biomass (trees, plants everything, above and below ground) contains about about 3000 billion tons of carbon 0.1 < 2 < 12 <<<<<<<<<<<< 3000 Our use and emissions of carbon pale in comparison to what the earth's biomass stores... Ok, so what's the point of all these intricate estimates? When it comes to decarbonization, it makes sense to pay a lot of attention to biomass - how to preserve it, how to grow it and how to leverage it. Don't you think there is a point? .

Every 4 months, the roots and shoots on #Beemats floating treatment #wetlands are harvested and analyzed for biomass accumulation, as well as #nitrogen and #phosphorus uptake and removal. #macrophytes #cleanwater #phytoremediation #bioremediation #sustainability #aquaticplants #environmentalengineering